VLE Denouement Tool Evaluation
Case study: DPS01 VLE type:
Name: Pauline Armsby Project-Research
Telephone: 020 8411 6581 Best day/time to call for interview:
e-mail: p.armsby@mdx.ac.uk
Strongly disagree =1 Not sure = 3 Strongly Agree=5
Fairly Disagree=2 Fairly Agree=4 Unknown = 0
Please enter the number '0-5' in the box for each question:
3 1) The induction was clear and understandable.
If not why: would not have understood language and system withoug personal support
4 2) The induction was useful.
If not why:
4 3) The summary totals was clear and understandable.
If not why:
4 4) The summary totals was useful.
If not why:
4 5) The e-content was clear and understandable.
If not why:
4 6) The e-content was useful.
If not why:
5 7) The e-communication was clear and understandable.
If not why:
5 8) The e-communication was useful.
If not why:
3 9) The telepistemology was clear and understandable.
If not why:
3 10) The telepistemology was useful.
If not why:
4 11) The Generic VLE Model was clear and understandable.
If not why:
4 12) The Generic VLE Model was useful.
If not why:
  13) The  Knowledge & Learning Grid was clear and understandable.
If not why:
  14) The  Knowledge & Learning Grid was useful.
If not why:
  15) The  DISC paradigm was clear and understandable.
If not why:
  16) The DISC paradigm was useful.
If not why:
  17) The  Web Metamorphosis Model was clear and understandable.
If not why:
  18) The  Web Metamorphosis Model was useful.
If not why:
  15) Any comments or suggestions to improve the VLE Denouement Toolkit:
make navigation easier
Email questions or comments to: pros@mdx.ac.uk