VLE Denouement Tool Evaluation
Case study: WBS2-4802-PilotUK VLE type:
Name: Jonathan Hawkes Instructional
Telephone: 020 8411 6072 Best day/time to call for interview:
e-mail: j.hawkes@mdx.ac.uk
Strongly disagree =1 Not sure = 3 Strongly Agree=5
Fairly Disagree=2 Fairly Agree=4 Unknown = 0
Please enter the number '0-5' in the box for each question:
4 1) The induction was clear and understandable.
If not why: termonology is difficult to grasp and overall concepts with no background
5 2) The induction was useful.
If not why: worto doing if only for discussion
3 3) The summary totals was clear and understandable.
If not why:
5 4) The summary totals was useful.
If not why:
5 5) The e-content was clear and understandable.
If not why: made a parallel to the classroom and it made sense
5 6) The e-content was useful.
If not why: been a good process to think about what the format and content is
4 7) The e-communication was clear and understandable.
If not why: ten criteia was an indicator of the importance of the area of communication
4 8) The e-communication was useful.
If not why: good prompt to standards and good practice
4 9) The telepistemology was clear and understandable.
If not why:
3 10) The telepistemology was useful.
If not why: hardest one to come to grips with so far
4 11) The emanagement was clear and understandable.
If not why: comprehesive list of criteia to see student and workplace relationship
3 12) The emanagement was useful.
If not why: based generalisations and suposition
5 11) The Generic VLE Model was clear and understandable.
If not why: doing this BEFORE making the WebCT course would be BEST - recommend to do this BEFORE doing WebCT
4 12) The Generic VLE Model was useful.
If not why: useful to wee whole
2 13) The  Knowledge & Learning Grid was clear and understandable.
If not why: too much info
3 14) The  Knowledge & Learning Grid was useful.
If not why: jurys out on how useful
3 15) The  DISC paradigm was clear and understandable.
If not why: in some ways teacher to learner axis good - but too much like K&L grid - is it different
4 16) The DISC paradigm was useful.
If not why: more useful because less info
5 17) The  Web Metamorphosis Model was clear and understandable.
If not why: because it was described not read it was easier to understand
5 18) The  Web Metamorphosis Model was useful.
If not why: good starting point
5 19) The Transitional Autonomy Model was understanable.
ave. If not why: now I've become more comfortable with the language, the intent and the vision of what the VLE is doing.
4 20) Any comments or suggestions to improve the VLE Denouement Toolkit: The TAM principles started out difficult to understand - maybe switch the order
Email questions or comments to: pros@mdx.ac.uk thoughts: given the amount of contexualisation given in person - stuggle to see it done alone
Skip: What about - supported by video conf? - Jon - yes, needs real-time interactivity.