VLE Denouement Tool Evaluation Please enter '0-5' in the box for each question:  <Back [Home] Next tab >
Case study: Sample pilot design VLE type:
Name: VLE manager (delete one) Instructional / Project-Research
Telephone: 00 44 (0)208 411 6118 Best day/time to call for interview:
e-mail: j.bloggs@mdx.ac.uk
Strongly disagree =1 Not sure = 3 Strongly Agree=5
Fairly Disagree=2 Fairly Agree=4 Unknown = 0
  1) The induction was clear and understandable.
If not why:
  2) The induction was useful.
If not why:
  3) The summary totals was clear and understandable.
If not why:
  4) The summary totals was useful.
If not why:
  5) The e-content was clear and understandable.
If not why:
  6) The e-content was useful.
If not why:
  7) The e-communication was clear and understandable.
If not why:
  8) The e-communication was useful.
If not why:
  9) The telepistemology was clear and understandable.
If not why:
  10) The telepistemology was useful.
If not why:
  11) The e-management was clear and understandable.
If not why:
  12) The e-management was useful.
If not why:
  13) The Generic VLE Model was clear and understandable.
If not why:
  14) The Generic VLE Model was useful.
If not why:
  15) The  Knowledge & Learning Grid was clear and understandable.
If not why:
  16) The  Knowledge & Learning Grid was useful.
If not why:
  17) The  DISC paradigm was clear and understandable.
If not why:
  18) The DISC paradigm was useful.
If not why:
  19) The  Web Metamorphosis Model was clear and understandable.
If not why:
  20) The  Web Metamorphosis Model was useful.
If not why:
  21) The Transitional Autonomy Model checklist was understanable.
If not why:
2 22) The Transitional Autonomy Model checklist was useful.
Ave:
### 22) Any comments or suggestions to improve the VLE Denouement Toolkit:
Email questions or comments to: pros@mdx.ac.uk
<Back [Home] Next tab >