VLE Denouement Tool Evaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
Case study: |
DPS01 |
VLE type: |
|
|
Name: |
Pauline Armsby |
Project-Research |
|
|
Telephone: |
020 8411 6581 |
Best day/time to call for interview: |
|
|
e-mail: |
p.armsby@mdx.ac.uk |
|
|
Strongly disagree =1 |
Not sure = 3 |
Strongly Agree=5 |
|
|
Fairly Disagree=2 |
Fairly Agree=4 |
Unknown = 0 |
|
Please
enter the number '0-5' in the box for each question: |
|
3 |
1) The induction was clear and
understandable. |
|
|
If not why: |
would not have understood language
and system withoug personal support |
4 |
2) The induction was useful. |
|
|
If not why: |
|
4 |
3) The summary totals was clear and
understandable. |
|
|
If not why: |
|
4 |
4) The summary totals was useful. |
|
|
If not why: |
|
4 |
5) The e-content was clear and
understandable. |
|
|
If not why: |
|
4 |
6) The e-content was useful. |
|
|
If not why: |
|
5 |
7) The e-communication was clear and
understandable. |
|
|
If not why: |
|
5 |
8) The e-communication was useful. |
|
|
If not why: |
|
3 |
9) The telepistemology was clear and
understandable. |
|
|
If not why: |
|
3 |
10) The telepistemology was useful. |
|
|
If not why: |
|
4 |
11) The Generic VLE Model was clear
and understandable. |
|
|
If not why: |
|
4 |
12) The Generic VLE Model was
useful. |
|
|
If not why: |
|
|
13) The Knowledge & Learning Grid was clear and understandable. |
|
|
If not why: |
|
|
14) The Knowledge & Learning Grid was useful. |
|
|
If not why: |
|
|
15) The DISC paradigm was clear and understandable. |
|
|
If not why: |
|
|
16) The DISC paradigm was useful. |
|
|
If not why: |
|
|
17) The Web Metamorphosis Model was clear and understandable. |
|
|
If not why: |
|
|
18) The Web Metamorphosis Model was useful. |
|
|
If not why: |
|
|
15) Any comments or suggestions to
improve the VLE Denouement Toolkit: |
|
|
make navigation easier |
|
|
Email questions or comments to: |
pros@mdx.ac.uk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|