Difficult experiences for counselling psychologists in mandatory process groups during their training

DCPsych thesis


McInerney, A.E. 2024. Difficult experiences for counselling psychologists in mandatory process groups during their training. DCPsych thesis Middlesex University / Metanoia Institute
TypeDCPsych thesis
Qualification nameDCPsych
TitleDifficult experiences for counselling psychologists in mandatory process groups during their training
AuthorsMcInerney, A.E.
Abstract

The participation in process groups during psychology and psychotherapy training can provide trainees with experiences that contribute significantly to their personal and professional development. However, some of the negative experiences associated with participation found in the research undertaken can cause trainee distress and psychological harm which frequently pertains to potential ethical breaches.

This study’s aim was to explore these ‘difficult experiences’ that can sometimes occur in mandatory process groups to determine the impact of these experiences on trainee safety and learning. The qualitative approach employed in this study involved nine qualified counselling psychologists from 5 different universities in the UK, aged from 28 to 59, who took part in semi-structured interviews which were transcribed and analysed using Template Analysis. This produced two primary themes ‘Ethical dilemmas – ‘Thrown to the lions’’ and ‘Lack of safety – A barrier to learning’. Researcher reflexivity was used throughout this study to enhance the transparency and accuracy of the findings.

The findings indicated that taking part in process groups can, at times, be a source of intensely distressing and harmful experiences reported by the trainees in this research, and that these experiences can lead to trainee withdrawal and non-engagement, which negatively impacts learning. The descriptions of difficult experiences included malicious attacks from peers, breaches of confidentiality, unsupportive facilitators, destructive interpersonal dynamics, and an implicit pressure to contribute to the group. The study’s findings have contributed to new knowledge in how difficulties experienced negatively impact learning for trainee counselling psychologists in the UK. In addition, the findings have shown that difficulties in process groups pertaining to ethical breaches are consistent across the five training programs in this study. It was felt important to therefore make some considered recommendations for counselling psychology educators based on the findings of this study and make improvements in the field for candidates and institutions.

Keywordsprocess groups; template analysis; counselling psychology training
Sustainable Development Goals3 Good health and well-being
Middlesex University ThemeHealth & Wellbeing
Department namePsychology
Science and Technology
Institution nameMiddlesex University / Metanoia Institute
Collaborating institutionMetanoia Institute
PublisherMiddlesex University Research Repository
Publication dates
Online06 Oct 2025
Publication process dates
Accepted05 Jun 2025
Deposited06 Oct 2025
Output statusPublished
Accepted author manuscript
File Access Level
Open
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/2w8835

Download files


Accepted author manuscript
AEMcInerney thesis.pdf
File access level: Open

  • 151
    total views
  • 103
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as