Bureaucracy, national security and access to justice. New light on Duncan v Cammell Laird

Article


Spencer, M. 2004. Bureaucracy, national security and access to justice. New light on Duncan v Cammell Laird. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly. 55 (3), pp. 277-302.
TypeArticle
TitleBureaucracy, national security and access to justice. New light on Duncan v Cammell Laird
AuthorsSpencer, M.
Abstract

The conventional view of 'Duncan v Cammell Laird' was succinctly expressed by Wade and Forsyth. "The case", they wrole: "is a good example of the most genuine type where it seems plain that the interests of litigants must be sacrificed in order to preserve secrets of state." To Zuckerman Duncan was "the most outstanding" example of a rare number of cases genuinely involving national security. These, along with almost all other commentators, argue that national security considerations meant that the
1942 decision was on its facts pretty well inevitable and probably correct. This article suggests thal the view that the plaintiffs had to take second place to the greater good of keeping Germany in ignorance of British naval secrets
perpetuates a myth. This myth was fostered by civil sewice lawyers in the interesis of litigation management by the Crown. The case papers tell a different story.

Research GroupLaw and Politics
PublisherQueen's University Belfast / School of Law
JournalNorthern Ireland Legal Quarterly
ISSN0029-3105
Publication dates
Print2004
Publication process dates
Deposited24 Oct 2008
Output statusPublished
Web address (URL)http://www.law.qub.ac.uk/schools/SchoolofLaw/Research/NorthernIrelandLegalQuarterly/
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/80w23

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 39
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as