Is staying home the safest option during wildfire? Historical evidence for an Australian approach

Article


Handmer, J. and Tibbits, A. 2005. Is staying home the safest option during wildfire? Historical evidence for an Australian approach. Global Environmental Change, Part B: Environmental Hazards. 6, pp. 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazards.2005.10.006
TypeArticle
TitleIs staying home the safest option during wildfire? Historical evidence for an Australian approach
AuthorsHandmer, J. and Tibbits, A.
Abstract

Australian bushfire agencies have a position that people in the path of a fire should either prepare, stay and defend their properties, or leave the area well before the fire front arrives. The position is based largely on observations that evacuating at the last minute is often fatal and that, generally, a key factor in house survival during a wildfire is the presence of people in the building. In practice, full implementation of the position has been difficult for a range of reasons.
As part of the Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) research effort www.bushfirecrc.com, our project is examining the evidence base for this position and aims to suggest ways of improving implementation.
We have found that the available evidence, which goes back some 60 yr, strongly supports the Australian position. The position is supported on the grounds of both improved safety and reduced property loss. The evidence also shows that the most dangerous option—and the cause of most fatalities—is last minute evacuation.

Research GroupFlood Hazard Research Centre
JournalGlobal Environmental Change, Part B: Environmental Hazards
ISSN1464-2867
Publication dates
Print11 Nov 2005
Publication process dates
Deposited30 Oct 2008
Output statusPublished
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazards.2005.10.006
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/80wq9

  • 32
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as