Is staying home the safest option during wildfire? Historical evidence for an Australian approach
Article
Handmer, J. and Tibbits, A. 2005. Is staying home the safest option during wildfire? Historical evidence for an Australian approach. Global Environmental Change, Part B: Environmental Hazards. 6, pp. 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazards.2005.10.006
Type | Article |
---|---|
Title | Is staying home the safest option during wildfire? Historical evidence for an Australian approach |
Authors | Handmer, J. and Tibbits, A. |
Abstract | Australian bushfire agencies have a position that people in the path of a fire should either prepare, stay and defend their properties, or leave the area well before the fire front arrives. The position is based largely on observations that evacuating at the last minute is often fatal and that, generally, a key factor in house survival during a wildfire is the presence of people in the building. In practice, full implementation of the position has been difficult for a range of reasons. |
Research Group | Flood Hazard Research Centre |
Journal | Global Environmental Change, Part B: Environmental Hazards |
ISSN | 1464-2867 |
Publication dates | |
11 Nov 2005 | |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 30 Oct 2008 |
Output status | Published |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazards.2005.10.006 |
Language | English |
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/80wq9
32
total views0
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month