Corkin, J.

Science, legitimacy and the law: regulating risk regulation judiciously in the European Community

Article

Corkin, J. 2008. Science, legitimacy and the law: regulating risk regulation judiciously in the European Community. European Law Review. 33.

Publication dates
Type	Article
Title	Science, legitimacy and the law: regulating risk regulation judiciously in the European Community
Authors	Corkin, J.
Research Group	Law and Politics
Publisher	Sweet and Maxwell
Journal	European Law Review
ISSN	0307-5400
Print	2008
Publication process dates
Deposited	12 Mar 2009
Output status	Published
Language	English

Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/81502

Log in to edit

56
total views
0
total downloads
4
views this month
0
downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Confederacy for now: European (dis)integration as virtuous circle or vicious cycle?

Corkin, J. 2019. Confederacy for now: European (dis)integration as virtuous circle or vicious cycle? Leuven European Commission.

The liberal order: holed below the waterline or a ship that we can rebuild at sea?

Corkin, J. 2019. The liberal order: holed below the waterline or a ship that we can rebuild at sea? in: Ahmed, T. and Fahey, E. (ed.) On Brexit: Law, Justices and Injustices Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 253-271

Endogenous transformation in European public administration: soft-law, transnationally-networked governance as a self-reinforcing trend

Corkin, J. and Boeger, N. 2014. Endogenous transformation in European public administration: soft-law, transnationally-networked governance as a self-reinforcing trend. in: Bohne, E., Graham, J., Raadschelders, J. and Lehrke, J. (ed.) Public Administration and the Modern State: Assessing Trends and Impact Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 223-237

Experimenting constitutionalism in the EU: co-ordinating legal difference through mutual recognition, mutual law and mutual learning

Corkin, J. 2014. Experimenting constitutionalism in the EU: co-ordinating legal difference through mutual recognition, mutual law and mutual learning. in: Joerges, C. and Glinski, C. (ed.) The European Crisis and the Transformation of Transnational Governance: Authoritarian Managerialism versus Democratic Governance Hart. pp. 359-382

Accountability and the new separation of powers

Corkin, J. 2016. Accountability and the new separation of powers. in: ten Napel, H. and Voermans, W. (ed.) The Powers that Be: Rethinking the Separation of Powers Leiden University Press. pp. 89-110

Refining relative authority: the judicial branch in the new separation of powers

Corkin, J. 2018. Refining relative authority: the judicial branch in the new separation of powers. in: Mendes, J. and Venzke, I. (ed.) Allocating Authority: Who Should do What in European and International Law? Hart. pp. 159-182

Who, then, in [European] law, is my neighbour? Limiting the argument from external effects

Corkin, J. 2017. Who, then, in [European] law, is my neighbour? Limiting the argument from external effects. in: Bardutzky, S. and Fahey, E. (ed.) Framing the Subject and Objects of Contemporary EU Law Edward Elgar Publishing . pp. 72-102

Institutional path-dependencies in Europe’s networked modes of governance

Boeger, N. and Corkin, J. 2017. Institutional path-dependencies in Europe’s networked modes of governance. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 55 (5), pp. 974-992. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12546

Evaluation of BEREC and the BEREC Office

Pierre, P., Hanssens, S., Szenci, K., Kauffmann, A., Simpson, S., Boeger, N. and Corkin, J. 2012. Evaluation of BEREC and the BEREC Office. European Commission.

The resilience of sector-specific regulation in the liberalized sectors: structural necessities or institutional inertias?

Boeger, N. and Corkin, J. 2013. The resilience of sector-specific regulation in the liberalized sectors: structural necessities or institutional inertias? in: Heide-Jørgensen, C., Neergaard, U., Poulsen, S. and Bergqvist, C. (ed.) Aims and Values in Competition Law Djoef.

Are expert networks driving the trend towards soft transnational coordination?

Corkin, J. and Boeger, N. 2013. Are expert networks driving the trend towards soft transnational coordination? in: Jurcys, P., Kjaer, P. and Yatsunami, R. (ed.) Regulatory hybridisation in the transnational sphere De Gruyter Brill.

How regulatory networks shaped institutional reform under the EU telecoms framework

Boeger, N. and Corkin, J. 2012. How regulatory networks shaped institutional reform under the EU telecoms framework. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. 14, pp. 49-73. https://doi.org/10.5235/152888712805580462

Reconciling European integration and national sovereignty with a conflict of laws method: conceptually compelling, practically problematical?

Corkin, J. 2009. Reconciling European integration and national sovereignty with a conflict of laws method: conceptually compelling, practically problematical? in: Nickel, R. (ed.) Conflict of laws and laws of conflict in Europe and beyond: patterns of supranational and transnational juridification Oslo, Norway Advanced Research on the Europeanisation of the Nation-State (ARENA).