Ethics, occupational therapy and discharge planning: four broken principles

Article


Atwal, A. and Caldwell, K. 2003. Ethics, occupational therapy and discharge planning: four broken principles. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. 50 (4), pp. 244-251. https://doi.org/4C118FBC34CA6B93183A
TypeArticle
TitleEthics, occupational therapy and discharge planning: four broken principles
AuthorsAtwal, A. and Caldwell, K.
Abstract

Occupational therapists play a significant role in the discharge process and are often exposed to ethically challenging decision-making. This paper examines the moral basis of discharge planning, relating it to the four fundamental bio-ethical principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. Using a case study design, data was collected from 10 occupational therapists and two elder care patients using the critical incident approach, as part of a wider study to determine their perceptions of discharge planning and multidisciplinary teamwork. Direct observation of interaction within multidisciplinary teams was also undertaken. The findings from the research suggest that occupational therapists are unintentionally breaching these four principles and therefore their code of ethics and professional conduct. It is suggested that further research is needed to determine how occupational therapists overcome these challenges. Furthermore, this research has important implications for education establishments regarding the teaching of ethics to occupational therapists.

PublisherWileyBlackwell
JournalAustralian Occupational Therapy Journal
ISSN0045-0766
Publication process dates
Deposited05 Nov 2009
Output statusPublished
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/4C118FBC34CA6B93183A
LanguageEnglish
File
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/81x9y

Download files

  • 42
    total views
  • 97
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 11
    downloads this month

Export as