Coping with Conway v. Rimmer [1968] AC 910: how civil servants control access to justice

Article


Spencer, M. and Spencer, J. 2010. Coping with Conway v. Rimmer [1968] AC 910: how civil servants control access to justice. Journal of Law and Society. 37 (3), pp. 387-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2010.00512.x
TypeArticle
TitleCoping with Conway v. Rimmer [1968] AC 910: how civil servants control access to justice
AuthorsSpencer, M. and Spencer, J.
Abstract

The article, based on a review of files in the National Archives, examines the role of civil servants in claims for the suppression of state documents at trial on grounds of public interest immunity (PII). Government lawyers solicited responses from other ministries to the landmark Lords decision in Conway v. Rimmer and coordinated the civil service campaign against this unwelcome judicial intrusion into their professional domain. The decision was seen as a threat to confidentiality and the secret cultivation of administrative expertise.
Academic debate on the evolution of the PII doctrine has centred on the allocation of responsibility between an overly deferential judiciary and ministerial concern to avoid political embarrassment. The role of civil servants may have been more coherent and ideologically motivated than previously appreciated. As the courts increasingly challenge government claims for suppression of material at trial, the article highlights the historical factors determining the executive's innate instinct for secrecy.

Research GroupLaw and Politics
PublisherWileyBlackwell
JournalJournal of Law and Society
ISSN0263-323X
Publication dates
Print26 Aug 2010
Publication process dates
Deposited17 Mar 2010
Output statusPublished
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2010.00512.x
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/8260v

  • 37
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 4
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as