Traditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core: Traditional Communication Formats: MARC is far from dead

Conference paper


Hopkinson, A. 1994. Traditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core: Traditional Communication Formats: MARC is far from dead. Traditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core. Vilnius, National Library of Lithuania 1995
TypeConference paper
TitleTraditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core: Traditional Communication Formats: MARC is far from dead
AuthorsHopkinson, A.
Abstract

This section is entitled Traditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core. Is there a
subject here that needs to be debated?
I hope to show that the two, the traditional and the more recent formats, are complimentary not adversary. But
to do this I need to explain why there is even a feeling that the traditional and the new might be opposed. I
need to explain why the question has been asked.
I am going to try and answer two questions: Do we still need MARC?; and Are MARC and the other 'formats'
competing for the same role?

ConferenceTraditional Communication Formats v SGML, Metadata, Dublin Core
Publication process dates
Deposited15 Apr 2010
Completed1994
Output statusPublished
LanguageEnglish
File
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/8295x

Download files

  • 33
    total views
  • 7
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as