Sequential versus simultaneous schelling models: experimental evidence

Article


Benito, J., Branas-Garza, P., Hernández, P. and Sanchis, J. 2011. Sequential versus simultaneous schelling models: experimental evidence. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 55 (1), pp. 60-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002710374714
TypeArticle
TitleSequential versus simultaneous schelling models: experimental evidence
AuthorsBenito, J., Branas-Garza, P., Hernández, P. and Sanchis, J.
Abstract

This article shows the results of experiments where subjects play the Schelling’s spatial proximity model. Two types of experiments are conducted: one in which choices are made sequentially and a variation of the first where the decision making is simultaneous. The results of the sequential experiments are identical to Schelling’s prediction: subjects finish in a segregated equilibrium. Likewise, in the variant of the simultaneous decision experiment, the same result is reached: segregation. Subjects’ heterogeneity generates a series of focal points in the first round. To locate themselves, subjects use these focal points immediately, and as a result, the segregation takes place again. Furthermore, simultaneous experiments with commuting costs allow us to conclude that introducing positive moving costs does not affect segregation.

KeywordsSchelling models; economic experiments; segregation
PublisherSage
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
ISSN0022-0027
Publication dates
Print01 Feb 2011
Online22 Jul 2010
Publication process dates
Deposited01 Apr 2013
Output statusPublished
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002710374714
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/83z4v

  • 15
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as