Design and implementation of parallel video combiner architecture for multi-user video conferencing at ultra-high definition resolution

Article


Baskaran, V., Chang, Y., Loo, J. and Wong, K. 2015. Design and implementation of parallel video combiner architecture for multi-user video conferencing at ultra-high definition resolution. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 74 (17), pp. 6589-6622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-014-1907-4
TypeArticle
TitleDesign and implementation of parallel video combiner architecture for multi-user video conferencing at ultra-high definition resolution
AuthorsBaskaran, V., Chang, Y., Loo, J. and Wong, K.
Abstract

In software driven multi-user video conferencing systems, consumer progression towards ultra-high definition (i.e., 8 k) resolution introduces new challenges to the video combination process in sustaining smooth combined video playback at high frame rates. As such, this paper analyzes the underlying architecture of a conventional video combiner to identify the performance impact of combined video frame rates at ultra-high definition resolutions. Then, two straightforward parallel video combination architectures using software application threads, namely PVC-1 and PVC-2, are studied as a benchmark. In PVC-1, the number of application threads tallies with the number of client videos to be combined, which improves playback performance at the expense of inconsistencies in inset client frame rates within a combined video. PVC-2 includes a synchronizer to address these inconsistencies, but exhibits marginal performance gains. To address the aforementioned problems, a balanced workload parallel video combiner architecture is proposed, namely PVC-3. In this architecture, a balanced workload management algorithm stitches client videos into an ultra-high definition combined frame, based on the number of available logical processors on a multi-core processor. This method improves frame rate performance and sustains consistent client frame rates within a combined video. Experimental results suggest that PVC-3 is superior over PVC-2 and achieves a frame rate performance gain of 27 % against a conventional video combiner for a combined video of 16 clients (each at a resolution of 720p) and zero standard deviation in combined frame rate consistency.

PublisherSpringer US
JournalMultimedia Tools and Applications
ISSN1380-7501
Publication dates
Print01 Sep 2015
Publication process dates
Deposited26 May 2015
Completed16 Mar 2014
Accepted16 Mar 2014
Output statusPublished
Additional information

First published online: 16 March 2014

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-014-1907-4
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/84yw5

  • 21
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as