The politics of collective repair: examining object-relations in a postwork society

Article


Graziano, V. and Trogal, K. 2017. The politics of collective repair: examining object-relations in a postwork society. Cultural Studies. 31 (5), pp. 634-658. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1298638
TypeArticle
TitleThe politics of collective repair: examining object-relations in a postwork society
AuthorsGraziano, V. and Trogal, K.
Abstract

In this article we look at repair as an emergent focus of recent activism in affluent societies, where a number of groups are reclaiming practices of repair as a form of political and ecological action. Ranging from those that fight for legislative change to those groups who are trying to support ecological and social change through everyday life practices, repair is beginning to surface tensions in everyday life and as such poses opportunities for its transformation. We survey a few of the practices that make up this movement in its various articulations, to take stock of their current political import.
While we suggest that these practices can be seen as an emergent lifestyle movement, they should not be seen as presenting a unified statement. Rather, we aim to show that they articulate a spectrum of political positions, particularly in relation to the three specific issues of property, pedagogy and sociality. These three dimensions are all facets of current internal discrepancies of repair practices and moreover express potential bifurcations as this movement evolves. Drawing on a diverse methodology that includes discourse analysis and participant observation, we suggest some of the ways in which this growing area of activity could play a significant role in resisting the commodification of the everyday and inventing postwork alternatives.

Research GroupSocially Engaged Practices cluster
LanguageEnglish
PublisherRoutledge
JournalCultural Studies
ISSN0950-2386
Publication dates
Online09 Mar 2017
Print03 Sep 2017
Publication process dates
Deposited30 Jan 2017
Accepted15 Dec 2016
Output statusPublished
Accepted author manuscript
Copyright Statement

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Cultural Studies on 09/03/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09502386.2017.1298638

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1298638
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/86w8x

Download files

  • 21
    total views
  • 3
    total downloads
  • 5
    views this month
  • 2
    downloads this month

Export as