Experimental and self-reported measures of risk taking and digit ratio (2D:4D): evidence from a large, systematic study

Article


Branas-Garza, P., Galizzi, M. and Nieboer, J. 2018. Experimental and self-reported measures of risk taking and digit ratio (2D:4D): evidence from a large, systematic study. International Economic Review. 59 (3), pp. 1131-1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12299
TypeArticle
TitleExperimental and self-reported measures of risk taking and digit ratio (2D:4D): evidence from a large, systematic study
AuthorsBranas-Garza, P., Galizzi, M. and Nieboer, J.
Abstract

Using a large (n=704) sample of laboratory subjects, we systematically investigate the links between the digit ratio - a biomarker for pre-natal testosterone exposure - and two measures of individual risk taking: (i) risk preferences over lotteries with real monetary incentives, and (ii) self-reported risk attitude. The digit ratio (also called 2D:4D) is the ratio of the length of the index finger to the length of the ring finger, and we consider both hands’ digit ratios. Previous studies have found that the digit ratio correlates with risk taking in some subject samples, but not others. In our sample, we find that both the right-hand and the left-hand digit ratio are significantly associated with risk preferences: subjects with lower digit ratios tend to choose riskier lotteries. Neither digit ratio, however, is associated with self-reported risk attitude.

PublisherWiley
JournalInternational Economic Review
ISSN0020-6598
Electronic1468-2354
Publication dates
Online12 May 2018
Print14 Aug 2018
Publication process dates
Deposited05 Jun 2017
Accepted31 May 2017
Output statusPublished
Publisher's version
License
Accepted author manuscript
Copyright Statement

Final accepted version: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Brañas‐Garza, P. , Galizzi, M. M. and Nieboer, J. (2018), Experimental and Self‐Reported Measures of Risk Taking and Digit Ratio (2D:4D): Evidence from a Large, Systematic Study. International Economic Review, 59: 1131-1157. doi:10.1111/iere.12299. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12299
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/86z7q

Download files


Publisher's version

Accepted author manuscript
  • 36
    total views
  • 19
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 3
    downloads this month

Export as