Frustrated at the interface between court litigation and arbitration? Don’t blame it on Brussels I! Finding reason in the decision of West Tankers, and the recast Brussels I

Book chapter

Farah, Y. and Hourani, S. 2015. Frustrated at the interface between court litigation and arbitration? Don’t blame it on Brussels I! Finding reason in the decision of West Tankers, and the recast Brussels I. in: Stone, P. and Farah, Y. (ed.) Research Handbook on EU Private International Law Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 116-151
Chapter titleFrustrated at the interface between court litigation and arbitration? Don’t blame it on Brussels I! Finding reason in the decision of West Tankers, and the recast Brussels I
AuthorsFarah, Y. and Hourani, S.
Research GroupLaw and Politics
Page range116-151
Book titleResearch Handbook on EU Private International Law
EditorsStone, P. and Farah, Y.
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
SeriesResearch Handbooks in European Law series
ISBN
Hardcover9781781954546
Paperback9781788111225
Electronic9781781954553
Publication dates
Print29 May 2015
Publication process dates
Deposited22 Mar 2018
Output statusPublished
Copyright Statement

This is a draft chapter. The final version is available in Research Handbook on EU Private International Law edited by Peter Stone and Youseph Farah, published in 2015, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781781954553.00011
The material cannot be used for any other purpose without further permission of the publisher, and is for private use only.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781954553.00011
LanguageEnglish
First submitted version
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/87926

Log in to edit

Download files

  • 24
    total views
  • 32
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

The invocation of the precautionary principle within the investor-state dispute settlement mechanism: not seizing the occasion
Masumy, N. and Hourani, S. 2024. The invocation of the precautionary principle within the investor-state dispute settlement mechanism: not seizing the occasion. Laws. 13 (2). https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13020022
An introduction to blockchain-based dispute resolution: the emergence of new procedural designs
Hourani, S. 2024. An introduction to blockchain-based dispute resolution: the emergence of new procedural designs. BCDR International Arbitration Review .
Mind the gap? A critical analysis of the recognition and enforcement of cross-border consumer ODR outcomes in the EU
Hourani, S. 2022. Mind the gap? A critical analysis of the recognition and enforcement of cross-border consumer ODR outcomes in the EU. Revista Ítalo-Española de Derecho Procesal. 2022 (1), p. 73–95. https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/681
The implementation of sustainable development as a requirement by ICSID tribunals: a proposal for a sustainability standard
Masumy, N. and Hourani, S. 2022. The implementation of sustainable development as a requirement by ICSID tribunals: a proposal for a sustainability standard. Romanian Arbitration Journal. 16 (1), pp. 44-69.
The launch of the campaign for greener arbitrations MENA sub-committee: moving towards more sustainable practices in the region
Hourani, S. and Masumy, N. 2021. The launch of the campaign for greener arbitrations MENA sub-committee: moving towards more sustainable practices in the region. The MENA Business Law Review . 2021 (3).
The legal reality of the recognition and enforcement of cross-border blockchain-based arbitral awards: beyond futuristic idealism [Blog post]
Hourani, S. 2019. The legal reality of the recognition and enforcement of cross-border blockchain-based arbitral awards: beyond futuristic idealism [Blog post]. Off the Chain blog.
Keeping up with access to justice in arbitration? A critical analysis
Hourani, S. and Valladares, L. 2020. Keeping up with access to justice in arbitration? A critical analysis. Arbitrate.com.
Access to justice and blockchain-based arbitration: new platforms could be a useful tool for resolving commercial disputes
Hourani, S. 2020. Access to justice and blockchain-based arbitration: new platforms could be a useful tool for resolving commercial disputes. American Bar Association.
The resolution of B2B disputes in blockchain-based arbitration: a solution for improving the parties’ right of access to justice in the digital age?
Hourani, S. 2020. The resolution of B2B disputes in blockchain-based arbitration: a solution for improving the parties’ right of access to justice in the digital age? in: de Oliveira, L. and Hourani, S. (ed.) Access to Justice in Arbitration: Concept, Context and Practice Wolters Kluwer.
Online Dispute Resolution pour les litiges B2B : prêt pour le monde des affaires
Hourani, S. 2017. Online Dispute Resolution pour les litiges B2B : prêt pour le monde des affaires. Newsletter N°14 de la Chambre Arbitrale Internationale de Paris.
Towards a fairer trading system for micro and small businesses post-Brexit? Comparative aspects with other common law systems
Hourani, S. 2018. Towards a fairer trading system for micro and small businesses post-Brexit? Comparative aspects with other common law systems. in: Heidemann, M. and Lee, J. (ed.) The Future of the Commercial Contract in Scholarship and Law Reform: European and Comparative Perspectives Springer. pp. 309-339
Recasting West Tankers in the deep water: how Gazprom and recast Brussels I reconcile Brussels I with international arbitration
Farah, Y. and Hourani, S. 2018. Recasting West Tankers in the deep water: how Gazprom and recast Brussels I reconcile Brussels I with international arbitration. Journal of Private International Law. 14 (1), pp. 96-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2018.1437333
Cross-border smart contracts: boosting international digital trade through trust and adequate remedies
Hourani, S. 2017. Cross-border smart contracts: boosting international digital trade through trust and adequate remedies. UNCITRAL Congress on ‘Modernizing International Trade Law to Support Innovation and Sustainable Development. Vienna 04 - 07 Jul 2017 United Nations. pp. 118-119