Investigating the demographic and attitudinal predictors of rape myth acceptance in U.K. Police officers: developing an evidence-base for training and professional development

Article


Murphy, A. and Hine, B. 2019. Investigating the demographic and attitudinal predictors of rape myth acceptance in U.K. Police officers: developing an evidence-base for training and professional development. Psychology, Crime and Law. 25 (1), pp. 69-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1503663
TypeArticle
TitleInvestigating the demographic and attitudinal predictors of rape myth acceptance in U.K. Police officers: developing an evidence-base for training and professional development
AuthorsMurphy, A. and Hine, B.
Abstract

Efforts to understand rape myth acceptance (RMA) as a cognitive framework in police, unifying key cognitive/attitudinal and demographic factors into one coherent model, are lacking. Using a cross-sectional survey design, predictors of RMA were assessed by linear hierarchical regression, including demographic (age, length of service, gender, experience of specialist rape investigation training) and attitudinal factors (hostility towards women, sexist attitudes, and explicit power/sex beliefs) among officers from a large U.K. police force (N = 912). The final model explained 44% of variance in RMA. Gender and previous specialist training significantly predicted RMA, but to a much lesser extent than attitudinal variables, which explain 42% of RMA variance. Only specialist rape investigation training remained significant when attitudinal variables were added. The greater contribution from attitudinal variables suggests that efforts to address RMA in officers must consider the broader attitudinal structures underpinning RMA. Findings highlight implications for evidence- based training for rape investigators.

PublisherTaylor and Francis
JournalPsychology, Crime and Law
ISSN1068-316X
Publication dates
Online29 Jul 2018
Print02 Jan 2019
Publication process dates
Deposited01 Oct 2018
Accepted14 Jul 2018
Output statusPublished
Accepted author manuscript
Copyright Statement

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Psychology, Crime and Law on 29/07/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1503663

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1503663
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/87yx3

Download files


Accepted author manuscript
  • 32
    total views
  • 41
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 1
    downloads this month

Export as