States of emergency

Blog


Grogan, J. 2020. States of emergency. Berlin, Germany Verfassungsblog. https://doi.org/10.17176/20200526-133657-0
TypeBlog
TitleStates of emergency
AuthorsGrogan, J.
Abstract

From 6 April to 26 May 2020, the Verfassungsblog and Democracy Reporting International Symposium reported on states of emergency and measures taken in response to COVID-19 in 74 countries, analysing legal measures and the use of emergency powers which impact nearly 80% of global population.The fifty days of the Symposium covered the height of the global legal reaction to the pandemic, offering a snapshot of countries in collective crisis. It began with a call for a global conversation on the kind of legal norms which should govern the situation of worldwide pandemic. This final contribution aims to trace the central themes, questions and issues raised by the Symposium. It considers constitutional safeguards on a ‘state of emergency’, and whether this is preferable to the use of ordinary legislation in managing a crisis. It examines the dangers of executive action, and whether countries have been successful in limiting the potential for abuse, as well as preventing or sanctioning it. It examines how states have struggled to maintain some degree of legislative and judicial normality, while other states have given it up entirely. It considers the relevance of trust and transparency of government action, and the concerns related to an approach driven by surveillance and sanction. Finally, it identifies the most successful approaches adopted, and the most detrimental. In doing so, it aims to form part of that global conversation which seeks to identify the most concerning legal developments in a global emergency, but also to advocate for the best practices emerging worldwide.
Analysis is drawn from country reports and commentaries available at Verfassungsblog.
The countries reports cover: Albania, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Belarus, Belgium, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, Estonia, European Union, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Hong Kong, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Kingdom, Ukraine, United States of America, Venezuela, Vietnam

Publication or CollectionVerfassungsblog: On Matters Constitutional
ISSN2366-7044
PublisherVerfassungsblog
Publication dates
Online26 May 2020
Print26 May 2020
Publication process dates
Deposited03 Jun 2020
Output statusPublished
Copyright Statement

SUGGESTED CITATION Grogan, Joelle: States of Emergency, VerfBlog, 2020/5/26, https://verfassungsblog.de/states-of-emergency/.
LICENSED UNDER CC BY NC ND

Web address (URL)https://verfassungsblog.de/states-of-emergency/
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.17176/20200526-133657-0
LanguageEnglish
Place of publicationBerlin, Germany
Publisher's version
License
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/88z48

Download files

  • 36
    total views
  • 4
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Explainer: compliance with the European Convention on Human Rights: the UK and Europe
Donald, A. and Grogan, J. 2025. Explainer: compliance with the European Convention on Human Rights: the UK and Europe. UK in a Changing Europe.
Explainer: Leaving the European Convention on Human Rights
Donald, A. and Grogan, J. 2024. Explainer: Leaving the European Convention on Human Rights. UK in a Changing Europe.
Explainer: The UK’s ECHR record: how common are Rule 39 orders and how often is the UK found to have violated rights?
Donald, A. and Grogan, J. 2024. Explainer: The UK’s ECHR record: how common are Rule 39 orders and how often is the UK found to have violated rights? UK in a Changing Europe.
Defeat in the Supreme Court: where next for UK asylum policy?
Donald, A. and Grogan, J. 2023. Defeat in the Supreme Court: where next for UK asylum policy? Verfassungsblog.
Explainer: What are the Rwanda Treaty and the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill?
Donald, A. and Grogan, J. 2023. Explainer: What are the Rwanda Treaty and the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill? UK in a Changing Europe.
Explainer: The Illegal Migration Act 2023
Donald, A. and Grogan, J. 2023. Explainer: The Illegal Migration Act 2023. UK in a Changing Europe.
Explainer: Compliance with the European Convention on Human Rights: the UK and Europe
Donald, A. and Grogan, J. 2023. Explainer: Compliance with the European Convention on Human Rights: the UK and Europe. UK in a Changing Europe.
Explainer: The Illegal Migration Bill
Donald, A. and Grogan, J. 2023. Explainer: The Illegal Migration Bill. UK in a Changing Europe.
Joelle Grogan, review of Miguel Poiares Maduro and Paul W. Kahn, eds., Democracy in Times of Pandemic: Different Futures Imagined [Book review]
Grogan, J. 2022. Joelle Grogan, review of Miguel Poiares Maduro and Paul W. Kahn, eds., Democracy in Times of Pandemic: Different Futures Imagined [Book review]. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 20 (1), pp. 521-525. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac028
Public health is not the only measure of success. The ‘health’ of democratic institutions matters too
Donald, A. and Grogan, J. 2022. Public health is not the only measure of success. The ‘health’ of democratic institutions matters too. London School of Economics and Political Science.
COVID‑19, the rule of law and democracy. Analysis of legal responses to a global health crisis
Grogan, J. 2022. COVID‑19, the rule of law and democracy. Analysis of legal responses to a global health crisis. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law. 14 (2-3), pp. 349-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00168-8
Policy paper on the implications of COVID-19: Insights into state governance and the rule of law, human rights and good governance during the COVID-19 pandemic
Grogan, J. and Donald, A. 2022. Policy paper on the implications of COVID-19: Insights into state governance and the rule of law, human rights and good governance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Leuven European Commission.
The rule of law as the perimeter of legitimacy for COVID-19 responses
Grogan, J. and Beqiraj, J. 2022. The rule of law as the perimeter of legitimacy for COVID-19 responses. in: Grogan, J. and Donald, A. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Law and the COVID-19 Pandemic Abingdon, Oxon Routledge. pp. 201-213
(Un)Governing: COVID-19 response in the UK
Grogan, J. 2022. (Un)Governing: COVID-19 response in the UK. in: Grogan, J. and Donald, A. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Law and the COVID-19 Pandemic Routledge. pp. 60-71
Lessons for a 'post-pandemic' future
Grogan, J. and Donald, A. 2022. Lessons for a 'post-pandemic' future. in: Grogan, J. and Donald, A. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Law and the COVID-19 Pandemic Abingdon, Oxon Routledge. pp. 473-484
The limited role of the European Union in the management and governance of the COVID-19 pandemic
Grogan, J. 2021. The limited role of the European Union in the management and governance of the COVID-19 pandemic. International Organizations Law Review. 18 (3), pp. 482-506. https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-18030008
[Introductory note to] Joined Cases A. K. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (C-585/18) and CP (C-624/18), DO (C-625/18) v. Sąd Najwyższy (C.J.E.U.)
Grogan, J. 2020. [Introductory note to] Joined Cases A. K. v. Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (C-585/18) and CP (C-624/18), DO (C-625/18) v. Sąd Najwyższy (C.J.E.U.). International Legal Materials. 59 (3), pp. 459-486. https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2020.24
States of emergency: analysing global use of emergency powers in response to COVID-19
Grogan, J. 2020. States of emergency: analysing global use of emergency powers in response to COVID-19. European Journal of Law Reform. 22 (4), pp. 338-354. https://doi.org/10.5553/EJLR/138723702021022004002
Right restriction or restricting rights? The UK acts to address COVID-19
Grogan, J. 2020. Right restriction or restricting rights? The UK acts to address COVID-19. Berlin, Germany Verfassungsblog. https://doi.org/10.17176/20200417-182523-0
The only certainty is uncertainty - risk to rights in the Brexit process
Grogan, J. 2019. The only certainty is uncertainty - risk to rights in the Brexit process. in: Fahey, E. and Ahmed, T. (ed.) On Brexit: Law, Justices and Injustices Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 65-80
Upholding the rule of law in the EU: what role for the FRA?
Pech, L. and Grogan, J. 2019. Upholding the rule of law in the EU: what role for the FRA? in: Byrne, R. and Entzinger, H. (ed.) Human Rights Law and Evidence-Based Policy: The Impact of the EU Fundamental Rights Agency London, UK Routledge. pp. 219-236
EU external Human Rights policy
Pech, L. and Grogan, J. 2020. EU external Human Rights policy. in: Wessel, R. and Larik, J. (ed.) EU External Relations Law: text, cases and materials Oxford, UK Hart Publishing. pp. 327-364
Rights and remedies at risk: Implications of the Brexit process on the future of rights in the UK
Grogan, J. 2019. Rights and remedies at risk: Implications of the Brexit process on the future of rights in the UK. Public Law. 2019 (Oct), pp. 683-702.
Three fast lessons and three slow lessons for UK democracy in 2019 [Blog post]
Grogan, J. 2019. Three fast lessons and three slow lessons for UK democracy in 2019 [Blog post]. Democratic Audit.
In terms of Brexit
Grogan, J. 2018. In terms of Brexit. in: Dunleavy, P., Park, A. and Taylor, R. (ed.) The UK's Changing Democracy LSE Press. pp. 256-263
The Lords have just raised the bar on the defence of rights and the rule of law in the Brexit process [Blog post]
Grogan, J. 2018. The Lords have just raised the bar on the defence of rights and the rule of law in the Brexit process [Blog post]. LSE Brexit Blog.
The good, the bad, and the ugly arguments for ditching the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights [Blog post]
Grogan, J. 2018. The good, the bad, and the ugly arguments for ditching the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights [Blog post]. LSE Brexit Blog.
Legislation that is and is not: the deeply problematic Repeal Bill [Blog post]
Grogan, J. 2017. Legislation that is and is not: the deeply problematic Repeal Bill [Blog post]. LSE Brexit Blog.
In terms of Brexit
Grogan, J. 2017. In terms of Brexit. in: Dunleavy, P. and Taylor, R. (ed.) The 2017 Audit of UK Democracy The London School of Economics. pp. 175-182
Rights on the chopping block: the Great Repeal Bill and the ghost of Henry VIII
Grogan, J. 2016. Rights on the chopping block: the Great Repeal Bill and the ghost of Henry VIII. EU Analysis Blog.
Suffering from withdrawal - controversy in the UK European Union (Withdrawal) Bill
Grogan, J. 2018. Suffering from withdrawal - controversy in the UK European Union (Withdrawal) Bill. Berlin, Germany Verfassungsblog.