The right to freedom of thought in the European Convention on Human Rights

Article


O'Callaghan, P. and Shiner, B. 2021. The right to freedom of thought in the European Convention on Human Rights. European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance. 8 (2-3), pp. 112-145. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-bja10016
TypeArticle
TitleThe right to freedom of thought in the European Convention on Human Rights
AuthorsO'Callaghan, P. and Shiner, B.
Abstract

This paper examines the right to freedom of thought in the European Convention on Human Rights against the background of technological developments in neuroscience and algorithmic processes. Article 9 ECHR provides an absolute right to freedom of thought when the integrity of our inner life or forum internum is at stake. In all other cases, where thoughts have been manifested in some way in the forum externum, the right to freedom of thought is treated as a qualified right. While Article 9 ECHR is a core focus of this paper, we argue that freedom of thought is further supported by Articles 8, 10 and 11 ECHR. This complex of rights carves out breathing space for the individual’s personal development and therefore supports the enjoyment of freedom of thought in its fullest sense. Charged with ‘maintaining and promoting the ideals and values of a democratic society’ as well as ensuring that individual human rights are given ‘practical and effective protection’, this paper predicts that the ECtHR will make greater use of the right to freedom of thought in the face of the emerging challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

Keywordsright to freedom of thought; ECHR; article 9 ECHR; technology
Research GroupLaw and Politics
PublisherDe Gruyter Brill
JournalEuropean Journal of Comparative Law and Governance
ISSN2213-4506
Electronic2213-4514
Publication dates
Online30 Mar 2021
Print30 Jun 2021
Publication process dates
Deposited22 Feb 2021
Accepted22 Jan 2021
Output statusPublished
Additional information

Volume 8 (2021): Issue 2-3 (Jun 2021): Special Issue: Comparative Study of the Right to Freedom of Thought

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-bja10016
Web of Science identifierWOS:000667775200002
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/89465

  • 80
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 4
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

The right to freedom of thought: an interdisciplinary analysis of the UN special rapporteur’s report on freedom of thought
O'Callaghan, P., Cronin, O., Kelly, B., Shiner, B., Walmsley, J. and McCarthy-Jones, S. 2024. The right to freedom of thought: an interdisciplinary analysis of the UN special rapporteur’s report on freedom of thought. The International Journal of Human Rights. 28 (1), pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2023.2227100
Ministry of Defence impunity: the Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Act 2021
Shiner, B. and Chowdhury, T. 2022. Ministry of Defence impunity: the Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Act 2021. Public Law. 2022 (Apr), pp. 289-310.
A distinct right to freedom of thought in South America: The Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Neurotechnology and the application of Bioethics principles
Colnago, C. and Shiner, B. 2021. A distinct right to freedom of thought in South America: The Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Neurotechnology and the application of Bioethics principles. European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance. 8 (2-3), pp. 245-270. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-bja10023
Introduction to a comparative study of the right to freedom of thought
Shiner, B. and O'Callaghan, P. 2021. Introduction to a comparative study of the right to freedom of thought. European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance. 8 (2-3), pp. 107-111. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-bja10018
Big data, small law: how gaps in regulation are affecting political campaigning methods and the need for fundamental reform
Shiner, B. 2019. Big data, small law: how gaps in regulation are affecting political campaigning methods and the need for fundamental reform. Public Law. 2019 (2), pp. 362-379.