Short-stay crisis units for mental health service users on crisis care pathways: systematic review and meta-analysis

Article


Anderson, K., Goldsmith, L., Lomani, J., Ali, Z., Clarke, G., Crowe, C., Jarman, H., Johnson, S., McDaid, D., Pariza, P., Park, A., Smith, J., Stovold, E., Turner, K. and Gillard, S. 2022. Short-stay crisis units for mental health service users on crisis care pathways: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJPsych Open. 8 (4). https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.534
TypeArticle
TitleShort-stay crisis units for mental health service users on crisis care pathways: systematic review and meta-analysis
AuthorsAnderson, K., Goldsmith, L., Lomani, J., Ali, Z., Clarke, G., Crowe, C., Jarman, H., Johnson, S., McDaid, D., Pariza, P., Park, A., Smith, J., Stovold, E., Turner, K. and Gillard, S.
Abstract

Background
Internationally, an increasing proportion of Emergency Department (ED) visits are mental health related. Concurrently, psychiatric wards are often occupied above capacity. Responding to these pressures, healthcare providers have introduced short-stay, hospital-based crisis units offering a therapeutic space for stabilisation, assessment and appropriate referral. Research lags behind roll-out, and a review of the evidence is urgently needed to inform policy and further introduction of similar units.
Aims
This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of short-stay, hospital-based mental health crisis units.
Method
We searched Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO up to March 2021 in this pre-registered review (PROSPERO: CRD42019151043). All designs incorporating a control or comparison group were eligible for inclusion, and all effect estimates with a comparison group were extracted and combined meta-analytically where appropriate. We assessed risk of bias of included studies using Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and Risk of Bias in randomized trials (RoB 2).
Results
Data from twelve studies from six countries (Australia, Belgium, Canada, the Netherlands, UK and US) and 67,505 participants were included. Data indicated that units delivered benefits on many outcomes. Units could reduce psychiatric holds (42% after intervention compared to 49.8% before intervention; difference = 7.8%; p < 0.0001) and increase outpatient follow-up care (χ2=37.42; d.f.=1, p<0.001). Meta-analysis indicated a significant reduction in length of ED stay of 164.24 minutes (95%CI -261.24 to -67.23 minutes; p<0.001), and number of inpatient admissions, odds ratio=0.55 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.68; p<0.001).
Conclusions
Short-stay mental health crisis units are effective for two important service-defined outcomes; reducing ED wait times and inpatient admissions. Further research should investigate impact of units on patient experience, and clinical and social outcomes.

KeywordsPsychiatric nursing; suicide; crisis care; emergency psychiatric care ; crisis unit
Sustainable Development Goals3 Good health and well-being
Middlesex University ThemeHealth & Wellbeing
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
JournalBJPsych Open
ISSN
Electronic2056-4724
Publication dates
Online25 Jul 2022
PrintJul 2022
Publication process dates
Submitted24 Mar 2022
Accepted06 Jun 2022
Deposited17 Jun 2022
Output statusPublished
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Open
Accepted author manuscript
License
File Access Level
Restricted
Supplemental file
License
File Access Level
Restricted
Copyright Statement

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.534
Web of Science identifierWOS:000829339000001
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/89wz0

  • 76
    total views
  • 13
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 2
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Psychedelics as a tool for a more connected and sustainable world? Considering the importance of rituals, boundaries, and commitment
Anderson, K., Elf, P. and Isham, A. 2024. Psychedelics as a tool for a more connected and sustainable world? Considering the importance of rituals, boundaries, and commitment. International Journal of Drug Policy. 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104571
Psychedelic intimacy: altered states of consciousness in romantic relationships
Neubert, J., Anderson, K. and Mason, N. 2024. Psychedelic intimacy: altered states of consciousness in romantic relationships. Journal of Psychedelic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2024.00319
Service use preceding and following first referral for psychiatric emergency care at a short-stay crisis unit: A cohort study across three cities and one rural area in England
Goldsmith, L., Anderson, K., Clarke, G., Crowe, C., Jarman, H., Johnson, S., Lomani, J., McDaid, D., Park, A., Smith, J. and Gillard, S. 2023. Service use preceding and following first referral for psychiatric emergency care at a short-stay crisis unit: A cohort study across three cities and one rural area in England. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 69 (4), pp. 928-941. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640221142530
The psychiatric decision unit as an emerging model in mental health crisis care: A national survey in England
Goldsmith, L., Anderson, K., Clarke, G., Crowe, C., Jarman, H., Johnson, S., Lloyd-Evans, B., Lomani, J., McDaid, D., Park, A., Smith, J., Turner, K. and Gillard, S. 2021. The psychiatric decision unit as an emerging model in mental health crisis care: A national survey in England. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 30 (4), pp. 955-962. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12849
What is the impact of psychiatric decision units on mental health crisis care pathways? Protocol for an interrupted time series analysis with a synthetic control study
Goldsmith, L., Smith, J., Clarke, G., Anderson, K., Lomani, J., Turner, K. and Gillard, S. 2020. What is the impact of psychiatric decision units on mental health crisis care pathways? Protocol for an interrupted time series analysis with a synthetic control study. BMC Psychiatry. 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02581-5
An affective (re)balancing act? The liminal possibilities for heterosexual partners on MDMA
Anderson, K., Reavey, P. and Boden, Z. 2018. An affective (re)balancing act? The liminal possibilities for heterosexual partners on MDMA. in: Kolehmainen, M. and Juvonen, T. (ed.) Affective Inequalities in Intimate Relationships Routledge. pp. 19-33
Exploring embodied and located experience: memory work as a method for drug research
Anderson, K. and McGrath, L. 2014. Exploring embodied and located experience: memory work as a method for drug research. International Journal of Drug Policy. 25 (6), pp. 1135-1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.08.008
‘Never drop without your significant other, cause that way lies ruin’: the boundary work of couples who use MDMA together
Anderson, K., Reavey, P. and Boden, Z. 2019. ‘Never drop without your significant other, cause that way lies ruin’: the boundary work of couples who use MDMA together. International Journal of Drug Policy. 71, pp. 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.05.004