The Comintern, Communist women leaders and the struggle for women's liberation in Britain between the wars: a political and prosopographical investigation, part 2

Article


McIlroy, J. and Campbell, A. 2022. The Comintern, Communist women leaders and the struggle for women's liberation in Britain between the wars: a political and prosopographical investigation, part 2. Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory. 50 (1), pp. 107-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2022.2050533
TypeArticle
TitleThe Comintern, Communist women leaders and the struggle for women's liberation in Britain between the wars: a political and prosopographical investigation, part 2
AuthorsMcIlroy, J. and Campbell, A.
Abstract

This is the second part of an article which explores and contextualises in revolutionary theory and practice the lives and careers of a highly unusual group of women, many hitherto hidden from history, who took a leading part in the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) between 1920 and 1939. The first instalment discussed the historiography and outlined a prosopographical approach to the subject. It traced the theory of women's liberation which informed the early Comintern and its national affiliates from its roots in the work of Engels, the German Social Democratic Party and the Second International; outlined developments in CPGB policy on the question over two decades; and presented a statistical analysis of 15 of the 18 women who figured in the party leadership between the wars. This second instalment provides mini-biographies of these Central Committee (CC) members. It examines their origins, ethnicity, religion, education, occupation, previous affiliations, political attitudes and career in the CPGB. Recuperation confirms that the group as a whole embraced Communism as a break with earlier women's politics – including those with direct experience of the suffrage movement. They rejected feminism but exhibited little interest in Marxist theory beyond Comintern pronouncements. Committed to the party and the policies of the Soviet Union as it moved from Lenin to Stalin, they were practical organisers and agitators who, on the whole, respected conventional gender roles. They exercised the right to be politically active, even in the face of domestic commitments, and engaged in the general activities of the party as well as specialist work with women. But they offered no explicit critique of the family, prevailing sexual mores or the subordination of women members within the CPGB.

KeywordsWomen's Liberation, Gender, Comintern, Communist Party of Great Britain, Soviet Union, Feminism
PublisherRoutledge
JournalCritique: Journal of Socialist Theory
ISSN0301-7605
Electronic1748-8605
Publication dates
Online27 Jun 2022
Print02 Jan 2022
Publication process dates
Deposited18 Oct 2022
Output statusPublished
Accepted author manuscript
Copyright Statement

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Critique: Journal of Socialist Theory on 2 Jan 2022, available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/03017605.2022.2050532

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2022.2050533
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/8q1xv

  • 29
    total views
  • 145
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 5
    downloads this month

Export as