Extractivism and the engendering of disasters: disaster risk creation in the era of the Anthropocene
Article
Bradshaw, S. 2024. Extractivism and the engendering of disasters: disaster risk creation in the era of the Anthropocene. Disaster Prevention and Management. 33 (3), pp. 194-205. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-06-2023-0146
Type | Article |
---|---|
Title | Extractivism and the engendering of disasters: disaster risk creation in the era of the Anthropocene |
Authors | Bradshaw, S. |
Abstract | This paper argues that extractivist logic creates the environmental conditions that produce ‘natural’ hazards and also the human conditions that produce vulnerability, which combined create disasters. Disaster Risk Creation is then built into the current global socio-economic system, as an integral component not accidental by-product. As part of the movement to liberate disasters as discipline, practice and field of enquiry, this paper does not talk disasters per se, but rather its focus is on ‘extractivism’ as a fundamental explanator for the anthropogenic disaster landscape that now confronts us. Applying a gender lens to extractivism as it relates to disaster, further highlights that Disaster Risk Management rather than alleviating, creates the problems it seeks to solve, suggesting the need to liberate gender from Disaster Risk Management, and the need to liberate us all from the notion of managing disasters. Since to ‘manage’ disaster risk is to accept uncritically the structures and systems that create that risk, then if we truly want to address disasters, our focus needs to be on the extractive practices, not the disastrous outcomes. The fundamental argument is that through privileging the notion of ‘disaster’ we create it, bring it into existence, as something that exists in and of itself, apart from wider socio-economic structures and systems of extraction and exploitation, rather than recognising it for what it is, an outcome/end product of those wider structures and systems. Our focus on disaster is then misplaced, and perhaps what disaster studies needs to be liberated from, is itself. |
Keywords | Gender; Patriarchy; Extractivism; Disaster risk creation |
Sustainable Development Goals | 5 Gender equality |
Middlesex University Theme | Sustainability |
Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited |
Journal | Disaster Prevention and Management |
ISSN | 0965-3562 |
Electronic | 1758-6100 |
Publication dates | |
Online | 29 Mar 2024 |
28 May 2024 | |
Publication process dates | |
Accepted | 20 Feb 2024 |
Deposited | 24 Apr 2024 |
Output status | Published |
Accepted author manuscript | License File Access Level Open |
Copyright Statement | This author accepted manuscript is deposited under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC) licence. This means that anyone may distribute, adapt, and build upon the work for non-commercial purposes, subject to full attribution. If you wish to use this manuscript for commercial purposes, please visit Marketplace https://marketplace.copyright.com/rs-ui-web/mp |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-06-2023-0146 |
Web of Science identifier | WOS:001192215800001 |
Language | English |
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/11q2x6
Download files
Accepted author manuscript
Bradshaw_Accepted_Extractivism.pdf | ||
License: CC BY-NC 4.0 | ||
File access level: Open |
57
total views67
total downloads6
views this month8
downloads this month