Owning the just transition: comparing citizen participation in South African and German wind farms

Article


Schulte, L. and Robinson, B. 2024. Owning the just transition: comparing citizen participation in South African and German wind farms. Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences. 19 (1-3), pp. 86-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2024.2339940
TypeArticle
TitleOwning the just transition: comparing citizen participation in South African and German wind farms
AuthorsSchulte, L. and Robinson, B.
Abstract

The global effort to reduce carbon emissions, driven by industrialised countries in the north is increasingly perceived as an unfair imposition by countries in the south. Wind turbine technology importantly contributes to the energy transition and its introduction has produced new players in energy systems, for instance through financial citizen participation in wind farms. The shape and degree of citizen participation is geographically variegated even within countries. Taking a multi-scalar perspective inspired by institutional theory, we explore the micro, meso and macro institutional and regulatory frameworks perceived as supportive or restrictive in the development of citizen participation in Germany and South Africa. Our findings highlight the importance of citizens’ ability and will to create legal structures for inclusive collective action and their ability to access affordable investment capital through local banks and other financing arrangements. Under the right institutional conditions decentralised energy systems, such as small-scale wind farms, provide an opportunity for fostering emotive and economic ownership by citizens in the global north and south alike.

Keywordsenergy transition; community energy; Germany; South Africa; multi-scalar institutional approach
Sustainable Development Goals11 Sustainable cities and communities
7 Affordable and clean energy
16 Peace, justice and strong institutions
13 Climate action
10 Reduced inequalities
9 Industry, innovation and infrastructure
1 No poverty
Middlesex University ThemeSustainability
PublisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)
JournalContemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences
ISSN2158-2041
Electronic2158-205X
Publication dates
Online15 May 2024
Print28 Jun 2024
Publication process dates
Submitted02 Oct 2023
Accepted27 Mar 2024
Deposited13 Jan 2025
Output statusPublished
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Open
Copyright Statement

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2024.2339940
Web of Science identifierWOS:001223908600001
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/13vw31

  • 1
    total views
  • 5
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 3
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Wind Energy and the just transition. Political and socio-economic pinch points in wind turbine manufacturing and windfarm communities in Europe and South Africa
Schulte, L., Stephens, S., Klindt, M., Umney, C. and Robinson, B. 2022. Wind Energy and the just transition. Political and socio-economic pinch points in wind turbine manufacturing and windfarm communities in Europe and South Africa. London, UK The British Academy. https://doi.org/10.5871/just-transitions-s-i/L-S
Final report: Wind Energy and the just transition. Political and socio-economic pinch points in wind turbine manufacturing and windfarm communities in Europe and South Africa’
Schulte, L., Stephens, S., Klindt, M., Umney, C. and Robinson, B. 2022. Final report: Wind Energy and the just transition. Political and socio-economic pinch points in wind turbine manufacturing and windfarm communities in Europe and South Africa’. Middlesex University UK & Aalborg University DK & University of Leeds UK, Nelson Mandela University ZA. https://doi.org/10.57685/EPRINTS.MDX.AC.UK.00036755
Welfare, work, and the conditions of social solidarity: British campaigns to defend healthcare and social security
Coderre-LaPalme, G., Greer, I. and Schulte, L. 2021. Welfare, work, and the conditions of social solidarity: British campaigns to defend healthcare and social security. Work, Employment and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170211031454
Creaming and parking in marketized employment services: an Anglo-German comparison
Greer, I., Schulte, L. and Symon, G. 2018. Creaming and parking in marketized employment services: an Anglo-German comparison. Human Relations. 71 (11), pp. 1427-1453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717745958
Insertion as an alternative to workfare: active labour-market schemes in the Parisian suburbs
Schulte, L., Greer, I., Umney, C., Symon, G. and Iankova, K. 2018. Insertion as an alternative to workfare: active labour-market schemes in the Parisian suburbs. Journal of European Social Policy. 28 (4), pp. 326-341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928717739237
Industrial policy, skill formation, and job quality in the Danish, German and English offshore wind turbine industries
Schulte, L. 2016. Industrial policy, skill formation, and job quality in the Danish, German and English offshore wind turbine industries. PhD thesis University of Greenwich Department of Human Resources and Organisational Behaviour