Measuring breastfeeding prevalence using demographic and health surveys

Article


Chabe-Ferret, B. 2024. Measuring breastfeeding prevalence using demographic and health surveys. BMC Public Health. 24 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19821-y
TypeArticle
TitleMeasuring breastfeeding prevalence using demographic and health surveys
AuthorsChabe-Ferret, B.
Abstract

Background: This study aims to investigate the measurement of breastfeeding prevalence indicators using Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data, focusing on early initiation, exclusive breastfeeding, and continued breastfeeding indicators as reported by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and on the discrepancies arising from small changes in their definition.

Methods: 260 DHS samples from 78 countries were analyzed to re-calculate usual indicators reported by WHO and UNICEF: early initiation of breastfeeding (EIB), exclusive breastfeeding under 6 months (EBF), and continued breastfeeding between 1 and 2 years (CBF12 and CBF24). Additionally, alternative estimates of the same indicators, slightly changing their definition, were calculated to test their robustness.

Results: The WHO and UNICEF indicators for early initiation (EIB) primarily capture cases where breastfeeding is initiated "immediately" after birth, omitting those initiated
within 0 or 1 hour. This discrepancy leads to substantial underestimation of levels in some regions, particularly South Asia, and in trends. Furthermore, sizable discrepancies between exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) indicators arise from the inclusion or exclusion of plain water in the definition, with significant variations across regions, especially in West and Middle Africa. However, continued breastfeeding indicators showed consistency across definitions, proving them robust for international comparisons and time trend estimations.

Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of understanding how breastfeeding indicators are defined and calculated using DHS data. Researchers should be cautious when using WHO and UNICEF indicators for early initiation and exclusive breastfeeding, as they may underestimate prevalence due to their narrow definition. Continued breastfeeding indicators, on the other hand, are less affected by small changes in definitions and provide reliable measures for cross-country comparisons and trend analyses. These findings underscore the need for standardized robust definitions and transparent reporting of breastfeeding indicators in global health assessments.

KeywordsBreastfeeding; Measurement; DHS; Early initiation; Exclusive breastfeeding; Breastfeeding duration
Sustainable Development Goals3 Good health and well-being
Middlesex University ThemeHealth & Wellbeing
Research GroupDecision-Making for Policy (DEMAP)
PublisherBioMed Central
JournalBMC Public Health
ISSN
Electronic1471-2458
Publication dates
Online31 Aug 2024
Print31 Aug 2024
Publication process dates
Submitted07 May 2024
Accepted16 Aug 2024
Deposited21 Aug 2024
Output statusPublished
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Open
Copyright Statement

© The Author(s) 2024.
Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19821-y
PubMed ID39217282
PubMed Central IDPMC11365256
Related Output
Is supplemented byhttps://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-024-19821-y#Sec14
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/188698

Download files


Publisher's version
s12889-024-19821-y.pdf
License: CC BY 4.0
File access level: Open

  • 21
    total views
  • 8
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Strategic fertility, education choices, and conflicts in deeply divided societies
Bezin, E., Chabe-Ferret, B. and de la Croix, D. 2024. Strategic fertility, education choices, and conflicts in deeply divided societies. Journal of European Economic Association. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvae027
Linking human capabilities with livelihood strategies to speed poverty reduction: evidence from Rwanda
Bird, K., Chabe-Ferret, B. and Simons, A. 2022. Linking human capabilities with livelihood strategies to speed poverty reduction: evidence from Rwanda. World Development. 151, pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105728
Segregation, fertility, and son preference: the case of the Roma in Serbia
Battaglia, M., Chabe-Ferret, B. and Lebedinski, L. 2021. Segregation, fertility, and son preference: the case of the Roma in Serbia. Journal of Demographic Economics. 87 (2), pp. 233-260. https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2020.8
Adherence to cultural norms and economic incentives: evidence from fertility timing decisions
Chabe-Ferret, B. 2019. Adherence to cultural norms and economic incentives: evidence from fertility timing decisions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 162, pp. 24-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.04.003
Remigration intentions and migrants' behavior
Chabe-Ferret, B., Machado, J. and Wahba, J. 2018. Remigration intentions and migrants' behavior. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 68, pp. 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2017.10.018
Adherence to cultural norms and economic incentives: Evidence from fertility timing decisions
Chabe-Ferret, B. 2016. Adherence to cultural norms and economic incentives: Evidence from fertility timing decisions. IZA.
Socioeconomic characteristics, fertility norms and the black-white fertility gap in the US
Chabe-Ferret, B. 2013. Socioeconomic characteristics, fertility norms and the black-white fertility gap in the US. Université catholique de Louvain.
Differences in fertility behavior and uncertainty: An economic theory of the minority status hypothesis
Chabe-Ferret, B. and Melindi Ghidi, P. 2013. Differences in fertility behavior and uncertainty: An economic theory of the minority status hypothesis. Journal of Population Economics. 26 (3), pp. 887-905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-012-0434-8