The legal validity of the adoption of AI in decision-making in international commercial arbitration

Book chapter


Hourani, S. 2026. The legal validity of the adoption of AI in decision-making in international commercial arbitration. in: Schmitz, A.J., Giacalone, M. and Ortolani, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of AI in Civil Dispute Resolution Cambridge University Press (CUP). pp. 248-261
Chapter titleThe legal validity of the adoption of AI in decision-making in international commercial arbitration
AuthorsHourani, S.
Abstract

The adoption of AI in arbitration practice has increased significantly in the past few years. Even though AI has not been adopted to date for the purpose of arbitral decision-making in international commercial arbitration, questions arise regarding its use in the decision-making process by arbitrators. There have been new regulatory developments on this in the past year with the publication of several guidelines on the use of AI in international commercial arbitration and the promulgation of the EU AI Act. The chapter carries out an analysis of these instruments and the current arbitration framework in order to provide a clarification on the evolving position of the law on this matter. The chapter namely explores the extent to which the regulatory framework considers that the use of AI tools in the decision-making process by arbitrators could lead to influencing the arbitrators’ decision which could lead to delegation of justice. The chapter argues that the international commercial arbitration framework does not expressly prohibit the use of AI in decision-making by arbitrators but that this use can come under breach of the arbitrator’s personal mandate and due process.

Keywordsartificial intelligence; international arbitration; ai and arbitrators
Sustainable Development Goals16 Peace, justice and strong institutions
Middlesex University ThemeCreativity, Culture & Enterprise
Page range248-261
Book titleThe Cambridge Handbook of AI in Civil Dispute Resolution
EditorsSchmitz, A.J., Giacalone, M. and Ortolani, P.
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
SeriesCambridge Law Handbooks
ISBN
Electronic9781009589086
Hardcover9781009589116
Publication dates
Print21 May 2026
Publication process dates
Accepted12 Feb 2026
Deposited14 Sep 2026
Output statusPublished
Accepted author manuscript
File Access Level
Open
Copyright Statement

This material has been published in revised form in The Cambridge Handbook of AI in Civil Dispute Resolution edited by Schmitz, A.J. et al [https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009589086.023]. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution or re-use. © copyright holder.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009589086.023
Related Output
Is part ofhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009589086
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/368zx6

Restricted files

Accepted author manuscript

  • 5
    total views
  • 2
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

The determination of the lex arbitri in decentralised blockchain-based arbitration: proceedings functioning in a legal vacuum in the absence of a chosen seat?
Hourani, S. 2026. The determination of the lex arbitri in decentralised blockchain-based arbitration: proceedings functioning in a legal vacuum in the absence of a chosen seat? in: Farah, Y. and Bergamini, E. (ed.) Research Handbook on EU Private International Law: Second Edition Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 206-224
The determination of the seat in blockchain-based arbitration: the quest for the closest connection in a decentralised legal vacuum
Hourani, S. and Farah, Y. 2026. The determination of the seat in blockchain-based arbitration: the quest for the closest connection in a decentralised legal vacuum. Transnational Dispute Management (TDM). 23 (1).
The invocation of the precautionary principle within the investor-state dispute settlement mechanism: not seizing the occasion
Masumy, N. and Hourani, S. 2024. The invocation of the precautionary principle within the investor-state dispute settlement mechanism: not seizing the occasion. Laws. 13 (2). https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13020022
An introduction to blockchain-based dispute resolution: the emergence of new procedural designs
Hourani, S. 2023. An introduction to blockchain-based dispute resolution: the emergence of new procedural designs. BCDR International Arbitration Review . 10 (1), pp. 89-110. https://doi.org/10.54648/BCDR2023007
Mind the gap? A critical analysis of the recognition and enforcement of cross-border consumer ODR outcomes in the EU
Hourani, S. 2022. Mind the gap? A critical analysis of the recognition and enforcement of cross-border consumer ODR outcomes in the EU. Revista Ítalo-Española de Derecho Procesal. 2022 (1), p. 73–95. https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/681
The implementation of sustainable development as a requirement by ICSID tribunals: a proposal for a sustainability standard
Masumy, N. and Hourani, S. 2022. The implementation of sustainable development as a requirement by ICSID tribunals: a proposal for a sustainability standard. Romanian Arbitration Journal. 16 (1), pp. 44-69.
The launch of the campaign for greener arbitrations MENA sub-committee: moving towards more sustainable practices in the region
Hourani, S. and Masumy, N. 2021. The launch of the campaign for greener arbitrations MENA sub-committee: moving towards more sustainable practices in the region. The MENA Business Law Review . 2021 (3).
The legal reality of the recognition and enforcement of cross-border blockchain-based arbitral awards: beyond futuristic idealism [Blog post]
Hourani, S. 2019. The legal reality of the recognition and enforcement of cross-border blockchain-based arbitral awards: beyond futuristic idealism [Blog post]. Off the Chain blog.
Keeping up with access to justice in arbitration? A critical analysis
Hourani, S. and Valladares, L. 2020. Keeping up with access to justice in arbitration? A critical analysis. Arbitrate.com.
Access to justice and blockchain-based arbitration: new platforms could be a useful tool for resolving commercial disputes
Hourani, S. 2020. Access to justice and blockchain-based arbitration: new platforms could be a useful tool for resolving commercial disputes. American Bar Association.
The resolution of B2B disputes in blockchain-based arbitration: a solution for improving the parties’ right of access to justice in the digital age?
Hourani, S. 2020. The resolution of B2B disputes in blockchain-based arbitration: a solution for improving the parties’ right of access to justice in the digital age? in: de Oliveira, L. and Hourani, S. (ed.) Access to Justice in Arbitration: Concept, Context and Practice Wolters Kluwer.
Towards a fairer trading system for micro and small businesses post-Brexit? Comparative aspects with other common law systems
Hourani, S. 2018. Towards a fairer trading system for micro and small businesses post-Brexit? Comparative aspects with other common law systems. in: Heidemann, M. and Lee, J. (ed.) The Future of the Commercial Contract in Scholarship and Law Reform: European and Comparative Perspectives Springer. pp. 309-339
Frustrated at the interface between court litigation and arbitration? Don’t blame it on Brussels I! Finding reason in the decision of West Tankers, and the recast Brussels I
Farah, Y. and Hourani, S. 2015. Frustrated at the interface between court litigation and arbitration? Don’t blame it on Brussels I! Finding reason in the decision of West Tankers, and the recast Brussels I. in: Stone, P. and Farah, Y. (ed.) Research Handbook on EU Private International Law Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 116-151
Recasting West Tankers in the deep water: how Gazprom and recast Brussels I reconcile Brussels I with international arbitration
Farah, Y. and Hourani, S. 2018. Recasting West Tankers in the deep water: how Gazprom and recast Brussels I reconcile Brussels I with international arbitration. Journal of Private International Law. 14 (1), pp. 96-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2018.1437333
Online Dispute Resolution pour les litiges B2B: prêt pour le monde des affaires
Hourani, S. 2017. Online Dispute Resolution pour les litiges B2B: prêt pour le monde des affaires. Chambre Arbitrale Internationale de Paris.
Cross-border smart contracts: boosting international digital trade through trust and adequate remedies
Hourani, S. 2017. Cross-border smart contracts: boosting international digital trade through trust and adequate remedies. UNCITRAL Congress on ‘Modernizing International Trade Law to Support Innovation and Sustainable Development. Vienna 04 - 07 Jul 2017 United Nations. pp. 118-119