Shoot to kill: understanding police use of force in combating suicide terrorism

Article


Loumansky, A. and Kennison, P. 2007. Shoot to kill: understanding police use of force in combating suicide terrorism. Crime, Law and Social Change. 47 (3), pp. 151-168.
TypeArticle
TitleShoot to kill: understanding police use of force in combating suicide terrorism
AuthorsLoumansky, A. and Kennison, P.
Abstract

More than a year after the killing of an innocent man, Jean Charles de Menezes, wrongly suspected by the Metropolitan Police of being a suicide bomber, the authors consider police accountability in combating terrorism. The authors argue that traditional policing styles in the UK are based on notions of reasonableness, compromise and respect for the individuals’ rights. A central tenet of our consent to be policed is the considered and rare use by police of coercive force, which is premised on a continuum ranging from negotiation at one extreme to lethal consequences at the other. Combating suicide terrorism in the UK using developed policies like Operation Kratos means that police are restricted to shooting to kill. Although there is undoubtedly a consensus that combating terrorism requires a robust and overt response, the authors ask whether it is ever possible to achieve a balance between liberty, security, and police accountability when dealing with difficult terrorist incidents. Police accountability is assessed in the context of operational policy-making and how that impacts on specialist police forces engaged in anti-terrorist operations. The authors conclude that since the introduction of Operation Kratos the nature of policing, and also its structure, is changing from being covert, understated and reasonable, to a zero tolerance, military, overt and oppressive style. In other words, traditional reactive policing styles have given way to a proactive military approach. Military styles of policing with overt displays of force tend to overlook civil rights and make more mistakes. We must be able to trust our police, because a trustworthy police is one which acknowledges our civil rights.

Research GroupLaw and Politics
PublisherKluwer Academic Publishers
JournalCrime, Law and Social Change
ISSN1573-0751
Publication dates
Print2007
Publication process dates
Deposited17 Mar 2009
Output statusPublished
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/81561

  • 156
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Levinas's contribution to the Law of Hospitality
Loumansky, A. 2020. Levinas's contribution to the Law of Hospitality. Liverpool Law Review. 41 (1), pp. 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-019-09236-w
A Levinasian approach to whistleblowing
Loumansky, A. and Lewis, D. 2013. A Levinasian approach to whistleblowing. Philosophy of Management. 12 (3), pp. 27-48. https://doi.org/10.5840/pom201312317
Critical legal theory's turn to Schmitt: not waving but drowning?
Loumansky, A. 2013. Critical legal theory's turn to Schmitt: not waving but drowning? Liverpool Law Review. 34 (1), pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-013-9126-z
Israel and the Palestinians: the challenge to Levinasian ethics
Loumansky, A. 2019. Israel and the Palestinians: the challenge to Levinasian ethics. SCTIW Review: Journal of the Society for Contemporary Thought of the Islamicate World.
Emanuel Levinas and the politics of non-violence [Book review]
Loumansky, A. 2015. Emanuel Levinas and the politics of non-violence [Book review]. Contemporary political theory. 14 (3), pp. e19-e21. https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2014.39
Violence and hate crime.
Goodman, A. and Loumansky, A. 2007. Violence and hate crime. British Society of Criminology Annual Conference on 'Crime and Justice in an Age of Global Insecurity'. Mannheim Centre for Criminology, London School of Economics 18 - 20 Sep 2007
A death foretold similarities between law and literature.
Loumansky, A. 2009. A death foretold similarities between law and literature. The American Society of Criminology, 61st annual meeting on 'Criminology & Criminal Justice Policy'.. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 04 - 07 Nov 2009
Levinas, Israel and the call to conscience.
Loumansky, A. 2005. Levinas, Israel and the call to conscience. Law and critique. 16 (2), pp. 181-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-005-8374-z
Working with vulnerable young people - keeping it in the family.
Goodman, A. and Loumansky, A. 2004. Working with vulnerable young people - keeping it in the family. American Society of Criminology Conference. Taking stock: the science of Criminology and the pursuit of justice.. Nashville.
Researching hate crime in diverse boroughs in London, some preliminary findings.
Goodman, A. and Loumansky, A. 2005. Researching hate crime in diverse boroughs in London, some preliminary findings. British Society of Criminology Conference. 12-14th July 2005.
Hate crime and barriers to victims’ willingness to report: experiences within multi-cultural London.
Goodman, A. and Loumansky, A. 2005. Hate crime and barriers to victims’ willingness to report: experiences within multi-cultural London. Annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, the interdisciplinary roots and branches of Criminology.. Toronto, Canada.
The anarchy of responsibility: alterity as a vehicle for self-representation (an ethical obligation demanded or owed).
Loumansky, A. 2009. The anarchy of responsibility: alterity as a vehicle for self-representation (an ethical obligation demanded or owed). Liverpool Law Review. 30 (3), pp. 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-010-9068-7
Women and work/life balance: a higher education perspective.
Loumansky, A., Goodman, S. and Jackson, S. 2007. Women and work/life balance: a higher education perspective. in: Cotterill, P., Jackson, S. and Letherby, G. (ed.) Challenges and negotiations for women in higher education. Dordrecht Springer.
Out of the frying pan into the viva
Loumansky, A. and Jackson, S. 2004. Out of the frying pan into the viva. International journal of women's studies. 5, pp. 22-32.
Enforcement and compliance
Loumansky, A., Goodman, A. and Feasey, S. 2008. Enforcement and compliance. in: Green, S., Lancaster, E. and Feasey, S. (ed.) Addressing offending behaviour : context, practice and values Cullompton Willan Publishing.
Levinas and the possibility of justice.
Loumansky, A. 2006. Levinas and the possibility of justice. Liverpool Law Review. 27 (2), pp. 147-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-006-9002-1
Me Voici, here I am, here I stand, I can do no other
Loumansky, A. 2000. Me Voici, here I am, here I stand, I can do no other. Law and critique. 11 (3), pp. 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008914216456
Hanging God at Auschwitz: the necessity of a solitary encounter with the other as the genesis of Levinasian ethics.
Loumansky, A. 2009. Hanging God at Auschwitz: the necessity of a solitary encounter with the other as the genesis of Levinasian ethics. Contemporary political theory. 8 (1), pp. 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1057/cpt.2008.47