Me Voici, here I am, here I stand, I can do no other
Article
Loumansky, A. 2000. Me Voici, here I am, here I stand, I can do no other. Law and critique. 11 (3), pp. 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008914216456
| Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Title | Me Voici, here I am, here I stand, I can do no other |
| Authors | Loumansky, A. |
| Abstract | This article offers a Levinasian reading of the case of Airedale N.H.S. Trust v Bland (1993). My contention is that the judicial reasoning that gave rise to the decision that Anthony Bland should die was driven by an ontological imperative I submit from a Levinasian perspective the decision was ethically indefensible because it failed to recognise Anthony Bland as the other. |
| Research Group | Law and Politics |
| Publisher | Kluwer Law International |
| Journal | Law and critique |
| ISSN | 1572-8617 |
| Publication dates | |
| Oct 2000 | |
| Publication process dates | |
| Deposited | 17 Mar 2009 |
| Output status | Published |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008914216456 |
| Language | English |
Permalink -
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/81565
166
total views0
total downloads11
views this month0
downloads this month