Me Voici, here I am, here I stand, I can do no other
Article
Loumansky, A. 2000. Me Voici, here I am, here I stand, I can do no other. Law and critique. 11 (3), pp. 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008914216456
Type | Article |
---|---|
Title | Me Voici, here I am, here I stand, I can do no other |
Authors | Loumansky, A. |
Abstract | This article offers a Levinasian reading of the case of Airedale N.H.S. Trust v Bland (1993). My contention is that the judicial reasoning that gave rise to the decision that Anthony Bland should die was driven by an ontological imperative I submit from a Levinasian perspective the decision was ethically indefensible because it failed to recognise Anthony Bland as the other. |
Research Group | Law and Politics |
Publisher | Kluwer Law International |
Journal | Law and critique |
ISSN | 1572-8617 |
Publication dates | |
Oct 2000 | |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 17 Mar 2009 |
Output status | Published |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008914216456 |
Language | English |
Permalink -
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/81565
59
total views0
total downloads3
views this month0
downloads this month