Power increases situated creativity

Article


Gervais, S., Guinote, A., Allen, J. and Slabu, L. 2013. Power increases situated creativity. Social Influence. 8 (4), pp. 294-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.742457
TypeArticle
TitlePower increases situated creativity
AuthorsGervais, S., Guinote, A., Allen, J. and Slabu, L.
Abstract

The present paper examined whether power was linked with situated creativity. We proposed that powerful (vs powerless) people engage in creative thought when creativity contributes to contextual goals but avoid creative thought when creativity impedes contextual goals. Extending the Situated Focus Theory of Power (Guinote, 2007a; 2010) to creativity, we suggested that powerful people are better able to achieve situational goals because they can flexibly focus on cues that indicate what is required for success in a given context. Across three experiments, we found that powerful (vs powerless) people engaged in more creative thinking when creativity facilitated contextual goals. This was not the case when creativity hindered contextual goals. Further, neither affect (Experiment 2) nor effort (Experiments 1 and 3) contributed to these effects. However, local processing undermined creativity for powerful people, indicating that processing style may contribute to the link between power and situated creativity. These findings suggest that powerful people flexibly vary creativity in line with the situation.

KeywordsCreativity; power; goals; global processing
LanguageEnglish
PublisherTaylor and Francis
JournalSocial Influence
ISSN1553-4510
Publication dates
Print2013
Publication process dates
Deposited25 Jun 2013
Output statusPublished
Accepted author manuscript
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.742457
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/8417w

Download files

  • 26
    total views
  • 4
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Sketching the contours of state authenticity
Sedikides, C., Lenton, A., Slabu, L. and Thomaes, S. 2019. Sketching the contours of state authenticity. Review of General Psychology. 23 (1), pp. 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000156
State authenticity
Sedikides, C., Slabu, L., Lenton, A. and Thomaes, S. 2017. State authenticity. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 26 (6), pp. 521-525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417713296
State authenticity in everyday life
Lenton, A., Slabu, L. and Sedikides, C. 2016. State authenticity in everyday life. European Journal of Personality. 30 (1), pp. 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2033
Employability in the first degree: the role of work placements on students’ perceptions of graduate employability
Mahmood, L., Slabu, L., Randsley de Moura, G. and Hopthrow, T. 2014. Employability in the first degree: the role of work placements on students’ perceptions of graduate employability. Psychology Teaching Review. 20 (2), pp. 126-136.
Trait and state authenticity across cultures
Slabu, L., Lenton, A., Sedikides, C. and Bruder, M. 2014. Trait and state authenticity across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 45 (9), pp. 1347-1373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114543520
Identifying differences in the experience of (in)authenticity: a latent class analysis approach
Lenton, A., Slabu, L., Bruder, M. and Sedikides, C. 2014. Identifying differences in the experience of (in)authenticity: a latent class analysis approach. Frontiers in Psychology. 5, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00770
Value stability and change during self-chosen life transitions: self-selection versus socialization effects
Bardi, A., Buchanan, K., Goodwin, R., Slabu, L. and Robinson, M. 2014. Value stability and change during self-chosen life transitions: self-selection versus socialization effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 106 (1), pp. 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034818
How does “being real” feel? The experience of state authenticity
Lenton, A., Bruder, M., Slabu, L. and Sedikides, C. 2013. How does “being real” feel? The experience of state authenticity. Journal of Personality. 81 (3), pp. 276-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00805.x
I feel good, therefore I am real: testing the causal influence of mood on state authenticity
Lenton, A., Slabu, L., Sedikides, C. and Power, K. 2013. I feel good, therefore I am real: testing the causal influence of mood on state authenticity. Cognition and Emotion. 27 (7), pp. 1202-1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.778818
How quickly can you detect it? Power facilitates attentional orienting
Slabu, L., Guinote, A. and Wilkinson, D. 2013. How quickly can you detect it? Power facilitates attentional orienting. Social Psychology. 44 (1), pp. 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000096
Getting what you want: power increases the accessibility of active goals
Slabu, L. and Guinote, A. 2010. Getting what you want: power increases the accessibility of active goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 46 (2), pp. 344-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.013