Public perceptions of communicating information about bowel cancer screening

Article


Woodrow, C., Watson, E., Rozmovits, L., Parker, R. and Austoker, J. 2008. Public perceptions of communicating information about bowel cancer screening. Health Expectations. 11 (1), pp. 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00474.x
TypeArticle
TitlePublic perceptions of communicating information about bowel cancer screening
AuthorsWoodrow, C., Watson, E., Rozmovits, L., Parker, R. and Austoker, J.
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The National Health Service has recently begun the introduction of a Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP), offering biennial screening to men and women aged 60-69 years. This study aimed to explore public perceptions regarding the communication of information designed to facilitate informed choice in relation to this new screening programme.METHODS: Fourteen single sex focus groups were conducted in England with 86 individuals aged 60-69 years. Focus groups were conducted either with individuals who had participated in the pilot phase of the BCSP, or with members of the public living outside the pilot areas. RESULTS: The majority of participants expressed positive attitudes towards bowel cancer screening, identifying items highlighting the benefits of the programme as important for others to know. Whilst some believed it was appropriate for information regarding the potentially negative aspects of the programme to be communicated at the outset, others expressed concerns about the generation of anxiety and potential for decreased participation. A number of participants questioned the concept of informed choice, arguing that once in place, a screening programme should be vigorously promoted. CONCLUSIONS: There is some variation in the type of information favoured by those eligible for bowel cancer screening. This may present challenges for the provision of information aiming to facilitate informed choice in the BCSP. Flexible approaches to information provision that recognize the perceptions of patients may be required.

Keywordsbowel cancer; information; informed choice; patient autonomy; screening
Research GroupApplied Health Psychology group
PublisherWiley
JournalHealth Expectations
ISSN1369-6513
Electronic1369-7625
Publication dates
Online11 Feb 2008
PrintMar 2008
Publication process dates
Accepted06 Oct 2007
Deposited23 Sep 2013
Output statusPublished
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00474.x
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/84626

  • 26
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

When good HR gets bad results: exploring the challenge of HR implementation in the case of workplace bullying
Woodrow, C. and Guest, D. 2014. When good HR gets bad results: exploring the challenge of HR implementation in the case of workplace bullying. Human Resource Management Journal. 24 (1), pp. 38-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12021
An investigation of workplace bullying in three UK healthcare organizations
Woodrow, C. and Guest, D. 2011. An investigation of workplace bullying in three UK healthcare organizations. New Challenges for a Healthy Workplace in Human Services. Vol. 8: Organizational Psychology and Health Care.
Bowel cancer screening in England: a qualitative study of GPs’ attitudes and information needs
Woodrow, C., Rozmovits, L., Hewitson, P., Rose, P., Austoker, J. and Watson, E. 2006. Bowel cancer screening in England: a qualitative study of GPs’ attitudes and information needs. BMC Family Practice. 7 (53). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-53
Public violence, staff harassment and the wellbeing of nursing staff: an analysis of national survey data
Woodrow, C. and Guest, D. 2012. Public violence, staff harassment and the wellbeing of nursing staff: an analysis of national survey data. Health Services Management Research. 25 (1), pp. 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1258/hsmr.2011.011019
Exploring the boundaries of human resource managers’ responsibilities
Guest, D. and Woodrow, C. 2012. Exploring the boundaries of human resource managers’ responsibilities. Journal of Business Ethics. 111 (1), pp. 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1438-8