Relativising human rights

Article


Landman, T., Kernohan, D. and Gohdes, A. 2012. Relativising human rights. Journal of Human Rights. 11 (4), pp. 460-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2012.730917
TypeArticle
TitleRelativising human rights
AuthorsLandman, T., Kernohan, D. and Gohdes, A.
Abstract

Standards-based measures of country human rights performance yields a performance ranking for countries that is “absolute” or reflects the current state of human rights performance without taking into account the relative social, political, or economic conditions within countries. While absolute ranking is useful, it can lead to perverse outcomes in other areas of work. This article provides an alternative method for ranking country human rights performance that takes into account an array of additional variables that are related to the protection of civil and political rights. The method involves creating a relative score to compare different measures of human rights performance over time and across different regions. This approach leads to a view of relative human rights performance that should be of interest to human rights scholars and practitioners.

PublisherTaylor and Francis
JournalJournal of Human Rights
ISSN1475-4835
Publication dates
Print05 Nov 2012
Publication process dates
Deposited05 Dec 2014
Output statusPublished
Publisher's version
Copyright Statement

This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2012.730917
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/84y3z

Download files

  • 32
    total views
  • 20
    total downloads
  • 8
    views this month
  • 2
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Minority versus majority: The choice of acquisition in Asia-Pacific countries
Nguyen, A., Kernohan, D. and Nguyen, T. 2024. Minority versus majority: The choice of acquisition in Asia-Pacific countries. International Journal of Finance & Economics. 29 (1), pp. 1125-1140. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2726
Blind faith in the Balkans: trade policy scenarios for South-East Europe
De Rosa, D. and Kernohan, D. 2007. Blind faith in the Balkans: trade policy scenarios for South-East Europe. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies. 1 (1), pp. 53-87. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEPEE.2007.015582
On the cost of re-establishing Yugoslavia: first estimates of the economic impact on Montenegro of establishing a customs union with Serbia
Gros, D., Kernohan, D., Najman, V. and Wozniak, P. 2004. On the cost of re-establishing Yugoslavia: first estimates of the economic impact on Montenegro of establishing a customs union with Serbia. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 4 (1), pp. 119-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850412331321758
Investor confidence and mutual fund performance in emerging markets: insights from India and Pakistan
Nguyen, A., Shahid, M. and Kernohan, D. 2018. Investor confidence and mutual fund performance in emerging markets: insights from India and Pakistan. Journal of Economic Studies. 45 (6), pp. 1288-1310. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-07-2017-0175
Cooperation and optimism in a social dilemma
Oyediran, O., Rivas, M., Coulson, M. and Kernohan, D. 2018. Cooperation and optimism in a social dilemma. Bulletin of Economic Research. 70 (4), pp. 335-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12161
Good neighbours matter: economic geography and the diffusion of human rights
Edwards, T., Kernohan, D., Landman, T. and Nessa, A. 2018. Good neighbours matter: economic geography and the diffusion of human rights. Spatial Economic Analysis. 13 (3), pp. 319-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2018.1412087
Growth, human development, and trade: The Asian experience
Mustafa, G., Rizov, M. and Kernohan, D. 2017. Growth, human development, and trade: The Asian experience. Economic Modelling. 61, pp. 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.12.007
Measuring firm-level productivity convergence in the UK: the role of taxation and R&D investment
Bournakis, I., Sushanta, M., Kernohan, D. and Tsouknidis, D. 2013. Measuring firm-level productivity convergence in the UK: the role of taxation and R&D investment. London Queen Mary University of London.
Evaluation of the pilot of Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Kelly, L., Adler, J., Horvath, M., Lovett, J., Coulson, M., Kernohan, D., Gray, M., London Metropolitan University, Middlesex University and Home Office Science 2013. Evaluation of the pilot of Domestic Violence Protection Orders. London, UK Home Office.