The unemployed and the moral case for benefit sanctions

Article


Daguerre, A. 2015. The unemployed and the moral case for benefit sanctions. Journal of Social Security Law. 22 (3), pp. 130-150.
TypeArticle
TitleThe unemployed and the moral case for benefit sanctions
AuthorsDaguerre, A.
Abstract

This article assesses the Conservative-led Coalition Government’s (2010–2015) record on benefit sanctions and work-for-your-benefit (workfare) policies. It is argued that while the schemes largely built upon previous Labour Governments’ (1997–2010) policies, the Coalition Government also switched back to a traditional Conservative discourse, according to which jobseekers are part of a “work-shy” minority who live at the expense of the “hard working” taxpaying majority. The crackdown on unemployment benefits was broadly popular with the public, which explains why the Coalition Government was able to implement a relatively harsh benefit sanctions regime. Work-for-your-benefit policies, by contrast, were faced with a series of political and legal challenges.

PublisherSweet and Maxwell
JournalJournal of Social Security Law
ISSN1354-7747
Publication dates
Print01 Nov 2015
Publication process dates
Deposited18 Apr 2016
Accepted01 Sep 2015
Output statusPublished
Accepted author manuscript
License
Copyright Statement

This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in the Journal of Social Security Law following peer review. The definitive published version Daguerre, Anne (2015) The unemployed and the moral case for benefit sanctions. Journal of Social Security Law, 22 (3). pp. 130-150. ISSN 1354-7747 is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service.

LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/86408

Download files

  • 20
    total views
  • 13
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 1
    downloads this month

Export as