Human understanding: The key triad

Article


Cobley, P. 2018. Human understanding: The key triad. The American Journal of Semiotics. 34 (1-2), pp. 17-38. https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs201862038
TypeArticle
TitleHuman understanding: The key triad
AuthorsCobley, P.
Abstract

John Deely’s contributions to the philosophy of signs have transformed semiotics. Key to this development has been Deely’s concern not just with human-produced texts but, instead, with human understanding amidst the context of semiosis in general, including realms beyond that of the human. Underpinning this concern, in turn, is his triad of sign, object and thing: A definite re-orientation of the theory of the sign. In this article it will be suggested that the triad, exemplifying suprasubjectivity and the primacy of relation, not only establishes the ground for rethinking common understandings of subjectivity, intersubjectivity and objectivity, it also provides a basis for re-conceptualizing other areas of social thought: In particular, how humans exist within their environment, both in terms of “affordances”—which generally facilitate human action—and “ideology”—which generally constrain it to the exigencies of determined circumstances. Deely’s realism, in its fundament of the sign/object/thing triad, demonstrates how mind-independent being is omnipresent, even when occluded in the objective order; it uncovers the “truth” of ideology and the Gegengefuge or ‘counter-structure’ of affordances.

Keywordssign relation; suprasubjectivity ; affordances; ideology ; semiotic animal; objectivity ; subjectivity; intersubjectivity; ecological semiotics
Research GroupEnglish Language and Literature
PublisherPhilosophy Documentation Centre
JournalThe American Journal of Semiotics
ISSN0277-7126
Electronic2153-2990
Publication dates
Print10 Aug 2018
Publication process dates
Deposited21 Sep 2018
Accepted10 Apr 2018
Output statusPublished
Accepted author manuscript
Web address (URL)https://www.pdcnet.org/ajs/content/ajs_2018_0034_0001_0017_0038
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs201862038
Web of Science identifierWOS:000444052000003
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/87y4y

  • 45
    total views
  • 41
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 1
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

“I’ll show you differences”: Skills, creativity and meaning
Siebers, J. and Cobley, P. 2024. “I’ll show you differences”: Skills, creativity and meaning. Social Epistemology. 38 (1), pp. 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2283845
The case against narrative
Cobley, P. 2023. The case against narrative. Cybernetics & Human Knowing. 30 (1-2), pp. 83-99.
Introduction
Cobley, P. 2023. Introduction. in: Pelkey, J. and Cobley, P. (ed.) Bloomsbury Semiotics Volume 4: Semiotic Movements London Bloomsbury Academic. pp. xix–14
Global semiotics
Cobley, P. 2023. Global semiotics. in: Pelkey, J. (ed.) Bloomsbury Semiotics Volume 1: History and Semiosis London Bloomsbury. pp. 17-38
A dialogue between distributed language and reading disciplines
Trasmundi, S. and Cobley, P. 2021. A dialogue between distributed language and reading disciplines. Language Sciences. 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101355
Close reading and distance: between invariance and a rhetoric of embodiment
Cobley, P. and Siebers, J. 2021. Close reading and distance: between invariance and a rhetoric of embodiment. Language Sciences. 84, pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101359
Practice as research: a cybersemiotic overview of knowing
Cobley, P. 2021. Practice as research: a cybersemiotic overview of knowing. in: Vidales, C. and Brier, S. (ed.) Introduction to Cybersemiotics: A Transdisciplinary Perspective Cham Springer.
“Who goes there?” Reflections on signs and personhood in Christopher Hutton’s Integrationism and the Self
Cobley, P. 2020. “Who goes there?” Reflections on signs and personhood in Christopher Hutton’s Integrationism and the Self. Sign Systems Studies. 48 (1), pp. 159-173. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2020.48.1.09
Peirce’s diagrammatic reasoning and the cinema: image, diagram, and narrative in The Shape of Water
Lee, Y. and Cobley, P. 2020. Peirce’s diagrammatic reasoning and the cinema: image, diagram, and narrative in The Shape of Water. Semiotica. 2020 (236-37), pp. 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0025
Ethical food packaging and designed encounters with distant and exotic others
Machin, D. and Cobley, P. 2020. Ethical food packaging and designed encounters with distant and exotic others. Semiotica. 2020 (232), pp. 251-271. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0035
Realism
Cobley, P. 2020. Realism. in: Allan, J., Gulddal, J., King, S. and Pepper, A. (ed.) The Routledge Companion to Crime Fiction London Routledge. pp. 202-210
Reimagining semiotics in communication
Cobley, P. 2020. Reimagining semiotics in communication. in: Filimowicz, M. and Tzankova, V. (ed.) Reimagining Communication: Meaning Routledge. pp. 1-26
Growth as constraint
Cobley, P. 2018. Growth as constraint. Recherches sémiotiques / Semiotic Inquiry. 38 (3), pp. 97-115. https://doi.org/10.7202/1076195ar
Afterword: semiotics and languaging
Cobley, P. 2019. Afterword: semiotics and languaging. Chinese Semiotic Studies. 15 (4), pp. 697-709. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2019-0035
Peirce in contemporary semiotics
Cobley, P. 2019. Peirce in contemporary semiotics. in: Jappy, T. (ed.) The Bloomsbury Companion to Contemporary Peircean Semiotics London Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 31-72
Don Favareau - congenor
Cobley, P. 2017. Don Favareau - congenor. in: Kull, K. and Cobley, P. (ed.) Biosemiotics in the Community: Essays in Honour of Donald Favareau Tartu University of Tartu Press. pp. 123-129
Discussion: integrationism, anti-humanism and the suprasubjective
Cobley, P. 2017. Discussion: integrationism, anti-humanism and the suprasubjective. in: Pablé, A. (ed.) Critical Humanist Perspectives: The Integrational Turn in Philosophy of Language and Communication London Routledge. pp. 267-284
The outsourcing of memory
Cobley, P. 2017. The outsourcing of memory. in: Thellefsen, T. and Sørensen, B. (ed.) Umberto Eco in His Own Words Berlin De Gruyter Mouton.
Observership, 'knowing' and semiosis
Cobley, P. 2018. Observership, 'knowing' and semiosis. Cybernetics & Human Knowing. 25 (1), pp. 23-47.
The communicative wheel: Symptom, signal, and model in multimodal communication
Durst-Andersen, P. and Cobley, P. 2018. The communicative wheel: Symptom, signal, and model in multimodal communication. Semiotica. 2018 (225), pp. 77-102. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0228
Is visual culture a by-product of the repression of nonverbal communication?
Cobley, P. 2017. Is visual culture a by-product of the repression of nonverbal communication? in: Zantides, E. (ed.) Semiotics and Visual Communication II: Culture of Seduction Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. 2-14
Semiotics
Cobley, P. and Machin, D. 2020. Semiotics. in: Bull, S. (ed.) A Companion to Photography WileyBlackwell. pp. 133-154
Deely, John Nathaniel (1942-)
Cobley, P. 2016. Deely, John Nathaniel (1942-). in: Shook, J. (ed.) The Bloomsbury Encyclopedia of Philosophers in America: From 1600 to the Present Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 244-247
Helpful feedback
Cobley, P. 2016. Helpful feedback. Cybernetics & Human Knowing. 23 (2), pp. 87-89.
Geopolitical reality: the thriller, global power, and the logic of revelation
Cobley, P. 2016. Geopolitical reality: the thriller, global power, and the logic of revelation. in: Pepper, A. and Schmid, D. (ed.) Globalization and the State in Contemporary Crime Fiction London Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 197-216
Cultural Implications of Biosemiotics
Cobley, P. 2016. Cultural Implications of Biosemiotics. Springer.
Biosemiotics, politics and Th.A. Sebeok’s move from linguistics to semiotics
Cannizzaro, S. and Cobley, P. 2015. Biosemiotics, politics and Th.A. Sebeok’s move from linguistics to semiotics. in: Velmezova, E., Kull, K. and Cowley, S. (ed.) Biosemiotic Perspectives on Language and Linguistic Springer.
Narrative
Cobley, P. 2016. Narrative. in: Moy, P. (ed.) Oxford Bibliographies in Communication Oxford University Press (OUP).
Signs
Cobley, P. 2016. Signs. in: Jensen, K., Rothenbuhler, E., Pooley, J. and Craig, R. (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy Chichester John Wiley & Sons.
Vistas for organized global semiotics
Cobley, P. and Bankov, K. 2016. Vistas for organized global semiotics. Semiotica. 2016 (211), pp. 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0093
Sign, object, thing: an eternal golden braid
Cobley, P. and Stjernfelt, F. 2016. Sign, object, thing: an eternal golden braid. Chinese Semiotic Studies. 12 (3), pp. 329-334. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2016-0031
组织总体符号学之展望
Cobley, P. 2016. 组织总体符号学之展望. Journal of Huaiyin Normal University.
Animal crackers: Being a Beast by Charles Foster, Profile Books, £14.99 GoatMan: How I took a holiday from being human by Thomas Thwaites, Princeton Architectural Press, $24.95/£14.99 [Book review]
Cobley, P. 2016. Animal crackers: Being a Beast by Charles Foster, Profile Books, £14.99 GoatMan: How I took a holiday from being human by Thomas Thwaites, Princeton Architectural Press, $24.95/£14.99 [Book review]. New Scientist. 230 (3067), pp. 42-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(16)30576-0
Semiotics
Cobley, P. 2016. Semiotics. in: Jensen, K., Rothenbuhler, E., Pooley, J. and Craig, R. (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy Chichester John Wiley & Sons.
Scaffolding development and the human condition
Cobley, P. and Stjernfelt, F. 2015. Scaffolding development and the human condition. Biosemiotics. 8 (2), pp. 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9238-z
The deaths of semiology and mythoclasm: Barthes and media studies
Cobley, P. 2015. The deaths of semiology and mythoclasm: Barthes and media studies. Signs and Media. https://doi.org/10.13760/b.cnki.sam.2015.01.001
Semioethics, voluntarism and anti-humanism
Cobley, P. 2007. Semioethics, voluntarism and anti-humanism. New Formations: a journal of culture/theory/politics.
Codes and coding: Sebeok’s zoosemiotics and the dismantling of the fixed-code fallacy
Cobley, P. 2014. Codes and coding: Sebeok’s zoosemiotics and the dismantling of the fixed-code fallacy. Semiotica. 2014 (198), pp. 32-45. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0100
To be means to communicate
Cobley, P. 2014. To be means to communicate. The American Journal of Semiotics. 30 (3/4), pp. 229-246. https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs2014303/412
Enhancing survival by not enhancing survival: Sebeok’s semiotics and the ultimate paradox of modelling: 9th Sebeok Fellow Address
Cobley, P. 2014. Enhancing survival by not enhancing survival: Sebeok’s semiotics and the ultimate paradox of modelling: 9th Sebeok Fellow Address. The American Journal of Semiotics. 30 (3/4), pp. 191-204. https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs2014303/410
Re-viewing Vantage Point
Cobley, P. 2014. Re-viewing Vantage Point. in: Buckland, W. (ed.) Hollywood Puzzle Films New York Routledge. pp. 217-232
Metaphysics of wickedness
Cobley, P. 2014. Metaphysics of wickedness. in: Thellefsen, T. and Bent, S. (ed.) Charles Sanders Peirce in His Own Words: 100 Years of Semiotics, Communication and Cognition Berlin De Gruyter.
What the humanities are for - A semiotic perspective
Cobley, P. 2014. What the humanities are for - A semiotic perspective. The American Journal of Semiotics. 30 (3-4), pp. 205-228. https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs2014303/411
Narrative. 2nd ed.
Cobley, P. 2013. Narrative. 2nd ed. Routledge.
Cybersemiotics and human modelling
Cobley, P. 2010. Cybersemiotics and human modelling. Entropy. 12 (9), pp. 2045-2066. https://doi.org/10.3390/e12092045
The cultural implications of biosemiotics
Cobley, P. 2010. The cultural implications of biosemiotics. Biosemiotics. 3 (2), pp. 225-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-010-9089-6
Introduction: what is sociosemiotics?
Cobley, P. and Randviir, A. 2009. Introduction: what is sociosemiotics? Semiotica. 2009 (173), pp. 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1515/SEMI.2009.001
Farewell to brass tacks
Cobley, P. 2003. Farewell to brass tacks. Semiotica. 147 (1-4), pp. 473-484. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2003.104
Throwing out the baby: Populism and active audience theory
Cobley, P. 1994. Throwing out the baby: Populism and active audience theory. Media Culture and Society. 16 (4), pp. 677-687. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344379401600409