Do different forms of government ownership matter for bank capital behavior? Evidence from China

Article


Jiang, C., Liu, H. and Molyneux, P. 2019. Do different forms of government ownership matter for bank capital behavior? Evidence from China. Journal of Financial Stability. 40, pp. 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2018.11.005
TypeArticle
TitleDo different forms of government ownership matter for bank capital behavior? Evidence from China
AuthorsJiang, C., Liu, H. and Molyneux, P.
Abstract

This study attempts to reconcile the conflicting theoretical predictions regarding how government ownership affects bank capital behaviour. Using a unique Chinese bank dataset over 2006-2015 we find that government-owned banks have higher target capital ratios and adjust these ratios faster compared to private banks, supporting the ‘development/political’ view of the government’s role in banking. This effect is stronger for local government-owned and state enterprise-owned banks than for central government-owned banks. We also find that undercapitalized government-owned banks increase equity while undercapitalized foreign banks contract assets and liabilities as their respective main strategy to adjust their capital ratios.

PublisherElsevier
JournalJournal of Financial Stability
ISSN1572-3089
Publication dates
Online28 Nov 2018
Print01 Feb 2019
Publication process dates
Deposited10 Dec 2018
Accepted27 Nov 2018
Output statusPublished
Accepted author manuscript
License
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2018.11.005
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/8810w

  • 27
    total views
  • 6
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 1
    downloads this month

Export as