What about my rights?: #MeToo and the presumption of innocence

The #MeToo movement has called attention to widespread instances of sexual harassment and sexual assault. It has allowed victims of these crimes to be able to speak freely and raise awareness of both the incidents themselves and the identity of the perpetrators. Some of these public statements have included very specific accusations against specific individuals. Commentators however, have argued that this movement violates the accused person’s right to the presumption of innocence. The public debate has raised questions as to how to support victims and take their claims seriously while also considering whether and how to respect the accused individual’s right to the presumption of innocence. This paper will examine the presumption of innocence in light of the #MeToo movement. First it will give some background and context to the #MeToo movement. Then it will discuss the presumption of innocence including a review of its scope and application, with a particular focus on when and how statements may hinder this right. A survey of the types of accusations that have arisen in the #MeToo movement will be discussed with a focus on specificity and context. The presumption of innocence will then be applied to the types of accusations that have been made in order to determine whether the accused person’s presumption of innocence has been implicated and, if so, whether the right has been interfered with or violated. The paper will conclude that while statements can implicate an accused person’s presumption of innocence, the instances in which statements made within the #MeToo movement do this are rare and only occur under a specific set of circumstances.