Can market size outweigh adverse comparative advantage?

Article


Gottschalk, S. 2002. Can market size outweigh adverse comparative advantage? The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development. 11 (1), pp. 43-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638190110093154
TypeArticle
TitleCan market size outweigh adverse comparative advantage?
AuthorsGottschalk, S.
Abstract

This paper investigates the roles of comparative advantage and market size in the international location of manufacturing production. Building on the conventional Helpman and Krugman (1985) general equilibrium framework, our analysis extends the present literature by incorporating both effects in the same model, while allowing trade costs to vary almost continuously from autarky to free trade. The main result of our exercise is that market size effects offset comparative advantage if countries have similar factor proportions. A large country with a slight comparative disadvantage in manufacturing production may thus be a net exporter of manufactures. A small country with the same comparative disadvantage would be a net importer of manufactures.

PublisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)
JournalThe Journal of International Trade & Economic Development
ISSN0963-8199
Electronic1469-9559
Publication dates
Print01 Jan 2002
Online09 Dec 2010
Publication process dates
Deposited15 Feb 2021
Accepted01 Oct 2002
Output statusPublished
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/09638190110093154
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/8942z

  • 35
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Demand for external finance by environmentally-motivated SMEs: An exploration of geographical disparities and potential in relation to Net Zero
Gottschalk, S. and Owen, R. 2023. Demand for external finance by environmentally-motivated SMEs: An exploration of geographical disparities and potential in relation to Net Zero. London, UK Enterprise Research Centre (ERC).
International financial regulation of cryptoassets and asset-backed tokens
Gottschalk, S. 2023. International financial regulation of cryptoassets and asset-backed tokens. in: Kim, S. (ed.) Fintech, Pandemic, and the Financial System: Challenges and Opportunities Bingley, UK Emerald Publishing Limited. pp. 145-181
Institutional and geopolitical aspects of bond spreads impacts on corporate capital structure in emerging markets
Gottschalk, S. and Ndang, B. 2023. Institutional and geopolitical aspects of bond spreads impacts on corporate capital structure in emerging markets. Global Business & Economics Review. 28 (3), pp. 266-297. https://doi.org/10.1504/GBER.2023.129996
Social Enterprise: Market Trends 2019
Owen, R., Lyon, F., Vickers, I. and Gottschalk, S. 2021. Social Enterprise: Market Trends 2019. London DCMS.
Digital currency price formation: a production cost perspective
Gottschalk, S. 2022. Digital currency price formation: a production cost perspective. Quantitative Finance and Economics. 6 (4), pp. 669-695. https://doi.org/10.3934/QFE.2022030
The impact of the financial crisis on the Euro area
Holland, D., Barrell, R., Fic, T., Gottschalk, S., Hurst, I., Liadze, I. and Orazgani, A. 2008. The impact of the financial crisis on the Euro area. National Institute Economic Review. 206, pp. 90-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027950108099854
From Black Wednesday to Brexit: Macroeconomic shocks and correlations of equity returns in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom
Gottschalk, S. 2021. From Black Wednesday to Brexit: Macroeconomic shocks and correlations of equity returns in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. International Journal of Finance & Economics. 28 (3), pp. 2843-2873. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2567
Product quality and the international location of manufacturing industry
Gottschalk, S. 2002. Product quality and the international location of manufacturing industry. Journal of economic integration. 17 (2), pp. 363-376. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2002.17.2.363
A closed-form formula for pricing bonds between coupon payments
Gottschalk, S. 2018. A closed-form formula for pricing bonds between coupon payments. Mathematical Finance Letters. 2018, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.28919/mfl/3650
Entropy measure of credit risk in highly correlated markets
Gottschalk, S. 2017. Entropy measure of credit risk in highly correlated markets. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 478, pp. 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.02.083
Capital adequacy requirements in emerging markets
Barrell, R. and Gottschalk, S. 2010. Capital adequacy requirements in emerging markets. in: Gottschalk, R. (ed.) The Basel Capital Accords in developing countries: Challenges for development finance London, UK. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 97-140
The impact of EMU on growth and employment
European Commission, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs, Barrell, R., Gottschalk, S., Holland, D., Khoman, E., Liazde, I. and Pomerantz, O. 2008. The impact of EMU on growth and employment. Brussels ,Belgium European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2765/63598
Foreign direct investment and exchange rate uncertainty in South‐East Asia
Gottschalk, S. and Hall, S. 2008. Foreign direct investment and exchange rate uncertainty in South‐East Asia. International Journal of Finance & Economics. 13 (4), pp. 349-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.355
Fiscal policy in Europe
Barrell, R. and Gottschalk, S. 2007. Fiscal policy in Europe. National Institute Economic Review. 201 (1), pp. 33-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027950107083047
Macroeconomic policy in Europe: Experiments with monetary responses and fiscal impulses
Barrell, R., Becker, B., Byrne, J., Gottschalk, S., Hurst, I. and van Welsum, D. 2004. Macroeconomic policy in Europe: Experiments with monetary responses and fiscal impulses. Economic Modelling. 21 (5), pp. 877-931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2003.10.005
The volatility of the output gap in the G7
Barrell, R. and Gottschalk, S. 2004. The volatility of the output gap in the G7. National Institute Economic Review. 188, pp. 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/00279501041881008