A commentary on the African Court’s decision in the case APDF and IHRDA v Republic of Mali: why socio-cultural endemic factors of a society could never support arguments based on force majeure
Blog
Pecorella, G. 2019. A commentary on the African Court’s decision in the case APDF and IHRDA v Republic of Mali: why socio-cultural endemic factors of a society could never support arguments based on force majeure. An International Law Blog.
| Type | Blog |
|---|---|
| Title | A commentary on the African Court’s decision in the case APDF and IHRDA v Republic of Mali: why socio-cultural endemic factors of a society could never support arguments based on force majeure |
| Authors | Pecorella, G. |
| Abstract | This post focuses on the notion of force majeure under international law and argues that while in the case APDF and IHRDA v Republic of Mali the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights got it right in not recognising the events listed by Mali as constituting force majeure, they should have addressed the arguments based on this latter. Moreover, by definition, the notion of force majeure can never encompass socio-cultural factors that are endemic to the state and that already existed at the moment of the signature and ratification of a treaty. |
| Sustainable Development Goals | 16 Peace, justice and strong institutions |
| Middlesex University Theme | Sustainability |
| Publication or Collection | International Law Blog |
| Publisher | An International Law Blog |
| Publication dates | |
| Online | 14 Jan 2019 |
| Publication process dates | |
| Deposited | 29 Sep 2026 |
| Output status | Published |
| Web address (URL) | https://internationallaw.blog/2019/01/14/a-commentary-on-the-african-courts-decision-in-the-case-apdf-and-ihrda-v-republic-of-mali-why-socio-cultural-endemic-factors-of-a-society-could-never-support-arguments-based-on-force-majeure/ |
| Language | English |
Permalink -
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/w0v29
4
total views0
total downloads2
views this month0
downloads this month