Regulation of online speech in the UK

Article


Jones, M. 2024. Regulation of online speech in the UK. University of the Pacific Law Review. 55 (2), pp. 261-276.
TypeArticle
TitleRegulation of online speech in the UK
AuthorsJones, M.
Abstract

Online speech in the UK is already being chilled due to the provisions and/or operation of a variety of laws. In statutes dealing with defamation, terrorism, data protection, privacy, and more, ‘notice and take-down’ regimes and state mandated content moderation are to be found aplenty. This has reached such saturation that instead of thinking of speech as ‘free’ one could be forgiven to observe that the adjectives that more accurately describe the situation in the UK nowadays is ‘restricted’, ‘permitted’, ‘proscribed’ and ‘censored’. What you can say now very much depends on who you are, what you are saying, and where you are saying it.
Against this background, the newly enacted Online Safety Act goes even further. Instead of the usual notice and takedown regime, corporations will be placed in charge of and legally required, to proactively seek out and limit online content. The likely result of outsourcing public duties like this would be censorship by algorithm. Various established principles of the law are being stretched or outright violated. This paper analyses the likely effects of the new law by comparing it to current domestic and select laws from other similar jurisdictions, and concludes that it will not operate in a transparent or accountable manner but will instead be anti-democratic and it will violate the rule of law.

KeywordsOnline Safety Act 2023; Defamation Act 2013; Defamation; Privacy law; Data Protection; Online Safety; Online Speech; Freedom of Speech
Sustainable Development Goals16 Peace, justice and strong institutions
Middlesex University ThemeCreativity, Culture & Enterprise
PublisherUniversity of the Pacific
JournalUniversity of the Pacific Law Review
ISSN
Electronic1520-9245
Publication dates
Print20 Feb 2024
Publication process dates
AcceptedOct 2023
Deposited15 Mar 2024
Output statusPublished
Publisher's version
File Access Level
Open
Copyright Statement

Scholarly Commons © 2024

Web address (URL)https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uoplawreview/vol55/iss2/12/
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/10y632

Download files


Publisher's version
  • 108
    total views
  • 25
    total downloads
  • 5
    views this month
  • 1
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

The right to freedom of thought in South Africa
Jones, M. 2025. The right to freedom of thought in South Africa. in: O’Callaghan, P. and Shiner, B. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook on The Right to Freedom of Thought Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press (CUP).
Defamation and the right to freedom of speech: the UK in comparative perspective
Jones, M. 2024. Defamation and the right to freedom of speech: the UK in comparative perspective. London and New York Routledge.
Constitutional monarchy in the UK as a populist mediator: the case of Brexit
Jones, M. 2023. Constitutional monarchy in the UK as a populist mediator: the case of Brexit. 2023 South Eastern Association of Law Schools Annual Conference. Boca Raton, Florida, USA 23 - 29 Jul 2023
Freedom of thought in South Africa: undoing Apartheid’s attempt at thought control
Jones, M. 2022. Freedom of thought in South Africa: undoing Apartheid’s attempt at thought control. The Right to Freedom of Thought: An Online Symposium. Online symposium 23 - 23 Nov 2022
Censorship by algorithm: the UK Online Safety Bill and corporate censorship of free speech
Jones, M. 2022. Censorship by algorithm: the UK Online Safety Bill and corporate censorship of free speech. 7th Academic Days on Open Government and Digital Challenges. Paris, France 08 - 09 Nov 2022
Defamation, the right to freedom of expression and libel reform in the UK: A comparative analysis of legal regulation and jurisprudence in the UK, the United States of America, Germany, and the European Court of Human Rights
Jones, M. 2020. Defamation, the right to freedom of expression and libel reform in the UK: A comparative analysis of legal regulation and jurisprudence in the UK, the United States of America, Germany, and the European Court of Human Rights. PhD thesis Middlesex University School of Law
The Defamation Act 2013: a free speech retrospective
Jones, M. 2019. The Defamation Act 2013: a free speech retrospective. Communications law. 24 (3), pp. 117-131.
Reports of the death of the libel writ have been greatly exaggerated: reviewing the UK Defamation Act 2013
Jones, M. 2019. Reports of the death of the libel writ have been greatly exaggerated: reviewing the UK Defamation Act 2013. Twelfth Annual Free Speech Discussion Forum. Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Budapest 03 - 04 Jun 2019
Privilege, power, and the perversion of privacy protection
Jones, M. 2019. Privilege, power, and the perversion of privacy protection. in: Weaver, R., Reichel, J. and Friedland, S. (ed.) Comparative Perspectives on Privacy in an Internet Era Durham, North Carolina Carolina Academic Press.
Is EU law effective in preventing forum shopping for the pursuit of actions arising from online infringement of personality rights?
Jones, M. 2017. Is EU law effective in preventing forum shopping for the pursuit of actions arising from online infringement of personality rights? in: Weaver, R., Friedland, S., Gilles, W. and Bouhadana, I. (ed.) Privacy in a Digital Age: Perspectives from Two Continents Durham, North Carolina Carolina Academic Press.
Double-lock or double-bind? The Investigatory Powers Bill and freedom of expression in the United Kingdom
Jones, M. 2017. Double-lock or double-bind? The Investigatory Powers Bill and freedom of expression in the United Kingdom. in: Weaver, R., Friedland, S., Raynouard, A. and Fairgrieve, D. (ed.) Cybersurveillance in a Post-Snowden World: Balancing the Fight Against Terrorism Against Fundamental Rights Durham, North Carolina Carolina Academic Press.
EU law relating to online infringement of personality rights – is EU law effective in preventing forum shopping for the pursuit of actions arising from online infringement of personality rights?
Jones, M. 2015. EU law relating to online infringement of personality rights – is EU law effective in preventing forum shopping for the pursuit of actions arising from online infringement of personality rights? Third International Privacy Discussion Forum, Universite de Paris, Sorbonne 1. Paris, France 29 - 30 Jun 2015 pp. 1-27
An introduction to South African banking and credit law
Jones, M. and Schoeman, H. 2006. An introduction to South African banking and credit law. Durban LexisNexis Butterworths.
Close corporations
Jones, M. 2004. Close corporations. in: Fouche, M. (ed.) Legal principles of contracts and commercial law Durban LexisNexis Butterworths. pp. 327-334
A critical evaluation of the perceived conflict between globalized trade and the protection of the environment with specific reference to the dispute resolution mechanism of the World Trade Organisation
Jones, M. 2005. A critical evaluation of the perceived conflict between globalized trade and the protection of the environment with specific reference to the dispute resolution mechanism of the World Trade Organisation. Masters thesis University of South Africa Law
The South African constitution and electronic commerce
Jones, M. and Schoeman, H. 2004. The South African constitution and electronic commerce. ISSA 2004 Information Security South Africa 3rd Annual Conference. Sandton, South Africa Aug 2004
Blueprints: tort law
Jones, M. 2014. Blueprints: tort law. Edinburgh Pearson.
The state, the universities and liberal legal education: students’ views from England, South Africa and Mauritius
Jones, M. and Spencer, M. 2013. The state, the universities and liberal legal education: students’ views from England, South Africa and Mauritius. Society of Legal Scholars Annual Conference. Edinburgh, Scotland 03 - 06 Sep 2013
The enforceability of environmental rights as human rights: a tale of two countries.
Jones, M. 2009. The enforceability of environmental rights as human rights: a tale of two countries. Society of Legal Scholars Centenary Conference. Keele, UK Jul 2009
The prospects for corporate governance operating as a vehicle for social change in South Africa
Miles, L. and Jones, M. 2009. The prospects for corporate governance operating as a vehicle for social change in South Africa. Deakin law review. 14 (1), pp. 53-77.