Can a joint tenant remain in possession after the other joint tenant has given notice to quit?

Article


Pascoe, S. 2004. Can a joint tenant remain in possession after the other joint tenant has given notice to quit? The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 68, pp. 370-387.
TypeArticle
TitleCan a joint tenant remain in possession after the other joint tenant has given notice to quit?
AuthorsPascoe, S.
Abstract

Discusses the development of case law on the validity of a notice to quit submitted by a single joint tenant where the other joint tenant wishes to remain in possession of the tenancy under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 s.11. Argues that the court was incorrect to rely on the rulings in Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk and Crawley BC v Ure to justify the judgment in Notting Hill Housing Trust v Brackley and reflects on the reasoning which the court should have adopted in Brackley. Considers whether s.11(1) imposes a duty for trustees to consult beneficiaries which would result in breach of trust if the trustees failed to consult and offers solutions to the problem in Brackley. Examines the House of Lords' ruling in Qazi v Harrow LBC on whether a refusal to allow a joint tenant to remain in possession violated the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 Art.8 and observes the impact of the ruling in Qazi, as witnessed in the Court of Appeal rulings in Newham LBC v Kibata and Bradney v Birmingham City Council.

Research GroupLaw and Politics
PublisherSweet and Maxwell
JournalThe Conveyancer and Property Lawyer
ISSN0010-8200
Publication dates
PrintOct 2004
Publication process dates
Deposited24 Oct 2008
Output statusPublished
Web address (URL)http://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Catalogue/ProductDetails.aspx?recordid=333&productid=6598
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/80w1z

  • 63
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Expanding the categories of negative easements- time for change?
Pascoe, S. 2023. Expanding the categories of negative easements- time for change? in: Mrockova, N., Nair, A. and Rostill, L. (ed.) Modern Studies in Property Law, Volume 12 Oxford, UK. Hart Publishing. pp. 85-106
Re-evaluating recreational easements- new norms for the twenty-first century?
Pascoe, S. 2019. Re-evaluating recreational easements- new norms for the twenty-first century? in: McFarlane, B. and Agnew, S. (ed.) Modern Studies in Property Law Hart Publishing.
Periodic tenancies subject to a fetter on the tenant- doctrinal dilemmas?
Pascoe, S. 2018. Periodic tenancies subject to a fetter on the tenant- doctrinal dilemmas? The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 82 (2), pp. 119-132.
The end of the road for human rights in private landowners' disputes?
Pascoe, S. 2017. The end of the road for human rights in private landowners' disputes? The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 81 (4), pp. 269-286.
Disability discrimination: recasting the parameters of proprietary rights?
Pascoe, S. 2017. Disability discrimination: recasting the parameters of proprietary rights? in: Conway, H. and Hickey, R. (ed.) Modern Studies in Property Law Hart Publishing.
Social obligation norm and the erosion of land ownership?
Pascoe, S. 2012. Social obligation norm and the erosion of land ownership? The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 76 (6), pp. 484-497.
Europe, human rights and land law in the 21st century: an English example
Pascoe, S. 2011. Europe, human rights and land law in the 21st century: an English example. Property Law Review. 1 (3), pp. 179-196.
Section 15 of the trusts of land and appointment of Trustees Act 1996: a change in the Law?
Pascoe, S. 2000. Section 15 of the trusts of land and appointment of Trustees Act 1996: a change in the Law? Conveyancer and property lawyer. 64, pp. 315-328.
Land law.
Pascoe, S. 2001. Land law. Taunton Studymates.
Improving conveyancing efficiency by redrafting Section 16?
Pascoe, S. 2005. Improving conveyancing efficiency by redrafting Section 16? The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 69, pp. 140-160.
Solicitors: be bold - create entailed interests
Pascoe, S. 2001. Solicitors: be bold - create entailed interests. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 65, pp. 396-416.
Right to occupy under a trust of land: muddled legislative logic?
Pascoe, S. 2006. Right to occupy under a trust of land: muddled legislative logic? The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer. 70, pp. 54-78.