The skies the limit! Collaborating to open the skies with China – challenges and opportunities

Article


Fox, S. and Ismail, R. 2017. The skies the limit! Collaborating to open the skies with China – challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance. 4 (4), pp. 387-422. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00404002
TypeArticle
TitleThe skies the limit! Collaborating to open the skies with China – challenges and opportunities
AuthorsFox, S. and Ismail, R.
Abstract

The research focuses on aviation collaboration from the perspective of two regional unities – the European Union (EU) and Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). The aspirations of each regional entity are considered alongside the mechanism to facilitate talks and developments with respect to aviation and specifically opening up the skies, so as to create more liberalised air service agreements with China.
This paper explores the strategy and framework mechanism of both the EU and ASEAN and the research questions the effectiveness of both frameworks as well as the political motivations for opening air service markets with China.
The research findings identify and discuss the developments, challenges and successes within the global aviation sector in terms of partnerships and progression with China to open up the skies.

Research GroupLaw and Politics
PublisherDe Gruyter Brill
JournalEuropean Journal of Comparative Law and Governance
ISSN2213-4506
Publication dates
Print13 Dec 2017
Publication process dates
Deposited14 Nov 2017
Accepted08 May 2017
Output statusPublished
Accepted author manuscript
Copyright Statement

This is the author’s accepted manuscript, the final version of record is published by Brill in 'European Journal of Comparative Law & Governance' and is available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00404002

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00404002
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/873yy

Download files


Accepted author manuscript
  • 19
    total views
  • 4
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Single European skies: functional airspace blocks - delays and responses
Fox, S. 2016. Single European skies: functional airspace blocks - delays and responses. Air & Space Law. 41 (3), pp. 201-228.
Aligning policies: a flying reform in higher education: The development of aviation professionals
Fox, S. 2016. Aligning policies: a flying reform in higher education: The development of aviation professionals. International Journal of Aviation Management. 3 (1), pp. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAM.2016.078651
ASEAN Open skies – aviation development in 2015: Blue or cloudy skies?
Fox, S. and Ismail, R. 2016. ASEAN Open skies – aviation development in 2015: Blue or cloudy skies? Annals of Air & Space Law. XL, pp. 607-654.
Aviation: a risky business. Green and level playing fields? A paradox of virtues 'dumping' - anti-competitiveness!
Fox, S. 2016. Aviation: a risky business. Green and level playing fields? A paradox of virtues 'dumping' - anti-competitiveness! International Journal of Public Law and Policy. 5 (4), pp. 333-367. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPLAP.2016.10002969
SPACE: The race for mineral rights ‘The sky is no longer the limit’ Lessons from earth!
Fox, S. 2016. SPACE: The race for mineral rights ‘The sky is no longer the limit’ Lessons from earth! Resources Policy. 49, pp. 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.05.001
BREXIT: A bolt from the blue! – Red sky in the morning?
Fox, S. 2016. BREXIT: A bolt from the blue! – Red sky in the morning? Issues in Aviation Law and Policy. 16 (1).
‘The skies the limit!’: Open Skies – with limitations!
Fox, S. and Ismail, R. 2017. ‘The skies the limit!’: Open Skies – with limitations! European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance. 4 (1), pp. 7-42. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00401001
Flying challenges for the future: aviation preparedness – in the face of cyber-terrorism
Fox, S. 2016. Flying challenges for the future: aviation preparedness – in the face of cyber-terrorism. Journal of Transportation Security. 9 (3-4), pp. 191-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-016-0174-1
"Mobility and movement are ‘our’ fundamental rights” . . . Safety & security – risk, choice & conflict!
Fox, S. 2017. "Mobility and movement are ‘our’ fundamental rights” . . . Safety & security – risk, choice & conflict! Issues in Aviation Law and Policy. 17 (1).
Borderless skies! Sovereign dominance, regionalism: lessons from Europe
Fox, S. 2017. Borderless skies! Sovereign dominance, regionalism: lessons from Europe. International Journal on World Peace. 34 (4), pp. 19-52.
The rise of the drones: Framework and governance – why risk it!
Fox, S. 2017. The rise of the drones: Framework and governance – why risk it! Journal of Air Law and Commerce. 82 (4), pp. 683-715.
A ‘risky business’ – aviation safety
Fox, S. 2016. A ‘risky business’ – aviation safety. in: Legal Risk Management, Governance and Compliance: Interdisciplinary Case Studies from Leading Experts Globe Law and Business Ltd.
To practice justice and right’ – international aviation liability: have lessons been learnt?
Fox, S. 2015. To practice justice and right’ – international aviation liability: have lessons been learnt? International Journal of Public Law and Policy. 5 (2), pp. 162-182. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPLAP.2015.071027
CONTEST’ing Chicago origins and reflections: lest we forget!
Fox, S. 2015. CONTEST’ing Chicago origins and reflections: lest we forget! International Journal of Private Law. 8 (1), pp. 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2015.066719
The evolution of aviation: in times of war and peace: blood tears and salvation
Fox, S. 2014. The evolution of aviation: in times of war and peace: blood tears and salvation. International Journal on World Peace. 31 (4), pp. 49-79.
Safety and security: the influence of 9/11 to the EU framework for air carriers and aircraft operators
Fox, S. 2014. Safety and security: the influence of 9/11 to the EU framework for air carriers and aircraft operators. Research in Transportation Economics. 45, pp. 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2014.07.004