The GDPR and the research exemption: considerations on the necessary safeguards for research biobanks

Article


Staunton, C., Slokenberga, S. and Mascalzoni, D. 2019. The GDPR and the research exemption: considerations on the necessary safeguards for research biobanks. European Journal of Human Genetics. 27 (8), pp. 1159-1167. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0386-5
TypeArticle
TitleThe GDPR and the research exemption: considerations on the necessary safeguards for research biobanks
AuthorsStaunton, C., Slokenberga, S. and Mascalzoni, D.
Abstract

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force in May 2018. The aspiration of providing for a high level of protection to individuals’ personal data risked placing considerable constraints on scientific research, that was contrary to various research traditions across the EU. Therefore, along with the set of carefully outlined data subjects’ rights, the GDPR provides for a two-level framework to enable derogations from these rights when scientific research is concerned. First, by directly invoking provisions of the GDPR on a condition that safeguards that must include ‘technical and organisational measures’ are in place and second, through the Member State law.
Although these derogations are allowed in the name of scientific research, they can simultaneously be challenging in light of the ethical requirements and well-established standards in biobanking that have been set forth in various research-related soft legal tools, international treaties and other legal instruments. In this paper we review such soft legal tools, international treaties and other legal instruments that regulate the use of health research data. We report on the results of this review, and analyse the rights contained within the GDPR and Article 89 of the GDPR vis-à-vis these instruments. These instruments were also reviewed to provide guidance on possible safeguards that should be followed when implementing any derogations. To conclude, we will offer some commentary on limits of the derogations under the GDPR and appropriate safeguards to ensure compliance with standard ethical requirements.

PublisherSpringer Nature
JournalEuropean Journal of Human Genetics
ISSN1018-4813
Electronic1476-5438
Publication dates
Online17 Apr 2019
Print01 Aug 2019
Publication process dates
Deposited14 Jun 2019
Accepted07 Mar 2019
Publisher's version
License
Copyright Statement

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0386-5
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/88529

Download files


Publisher's version

Restricted files

Accepted author manuscript

  • 31
    total views
  • 7
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Appropriate safeguards and Article 89 of the GDPR: considerations for biobank, databank and genetic research
Staunton, C., Slokenberga, S., Parziale, A. and Mascalzoni, D. 2022. Appropriate safeguards and Article 89 of the GDPR: considerations for biobank, databank and genetic research. Frontiers in Genetics. 13, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.719317
Return of research results (RoRR) to the healthy CHRIS cohort: designing a policy with the participants
Staunton, C., Kösters, M., Pramstaller, P. and Mascalzoni, D. 2021. Return of research results (RoRR) to the healthy CHRIS cohort: designing a policy with the participants. Journal of Community Genetics. 12 (4), pp. 577-592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-021-00536-1
Balancing scientific interests and the rights of participants in designing a recall by genotype study
Mascalzoni, D., Biasiotto, R., Borsche, M., Brüggemann, N., De Grandi, A., Goegele, M., Frygner-Holm, S., Klein, C., Kösters, M., Staunton, C., Pramstaller, P., Krawczak, M. and Hicks, A. 2021. Balancing scientific interests and the rights of participants in designing a recall by genotype study. European Journal of Human Genetics. 29 (7), pp. 1146-1157. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00860-7
The governance of personal data for COVID-19 response: perspective from the access to COVID-19 tools accelerator
Staunton, C., Hannay, E., John, O., Johnson, M., Kadam, R., Sampath, R., ACT-Accelerator R&D and Digital Working Group 2021. The governance of personal data for COVID-19 response: perspective from the access to COVID-19 tools accelerator. BMJ Global Health. 6 (5), pp. 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006095
Public involvement in the governance of population-level biomedical research: unresolved questions and future directions
Erikainen, S., Friesen, P., Rand, L., Jongsma, K., Dunn, M., Sorbie, A., McCoy, M., Bell, J., Burgess, M., Chen, H., Chico, V., Cunningham-Burley, S., Darbyshire, J., Dawson, R., Evans, A., Fahy, N., Finlay, T., Frith, L., Goldenberg, A., Hinton, L., Hoppe, N., Hughes, N., Koenig, B., Lignou, S., McGowan, M., Parker, M., Prainsack, B., Shabani, M., Staunton, C., Thompson, R., Varnai, K., Vayena, E., Williams, O., Williamson, M., Chan, S. and Sheehan, M. 2021. Public involvement in the governance of population-level biomedical research: unresolved questions and future directions. Journal of Medical Ethics. 47 (7), pp. 522-525. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106530
Engaging research ethics committees to develop an ethics and governance framework for best practices in genomic research and biobanking in Africa: the H3Africa model [Commentary]
Tindana, P., Yakubu, A., Staunton, C., Matimba, A., Littler, K., Madden, E., Munung, N. and de Vries, J. 2019. Engaging research ethics committees to develop an ethics and governance framework for best practices in genomic research and biobanking in Africa: the H3Africa model [Commentary]. BMC Medical Ethics. 20 (1), p. 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0398-2
The governance of genomic biobank research in Africa: reframing the regulatory tilt
Staunton, C. and de Vries, J. 2020. The governance of genomic biobank research in Africa: reframing the regulatory tilt. Journal of Law and Biosciences. 0, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsz018
Between a rock and a hard place: COVID-19 and South Africa’s response
Staunton, C., Swanepoel, C. and Labuschagine, M. 2020. Between a rock and a hard place: COVID-19 and South Africa’s response. Journal of Law and the Biosciences. 7 (1), pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa052
Protection of Personal Information Act 2013 and data protection for health research in South Africa
Staunton, C., Adams, R., Anderson, D., Croxton, T., Kamuya, D., Munene, M. and Swanepoel, C. 2020. Protection of Personal Information Act 2013 and data protection for health research in South Africa. International Data Privacy Law Journal. 10 (2), pp. 160-179. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipz024
Safeguarding the future of genomic research in South Africa: Broad consent and the protection of Personal Information Act No. 4 of 2013
Staunton, C., Adams, R., Botes, M., Dove, E., Horn, L., Labuschaigne, M., Loots, G., Mahomed, S., Makuba, J., Olckers, A., Pepper, M., Pope, A., Ramsay, M., Loideain, N. and De Vries, J. 2019. Safeguarding the future of genomic research in South Africa: Broad consent and the protection of Personal Information Act No. 4 of 2013. South African Medical Journal. 109 (7), pp. 468-470. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v109i7.14148
Negotiating requests for reimbursement for community engagement: challenges in developing an educational video for genomic biobanking research in South Africa
Staunton, C., Abayomi, A., Bassa, F. and Moodley, K. 2019. Negotiating requests for reimbursement for community engagement: challenges in developing an educational video for genomic biobanking research in South Africa. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619856223
Protection of personal information Act No. 4 of 2013: Implications for biobanks
Staunton, C. and De Stadler, E. 2019. Protection of personal information Act No. 4 of 2013: Implications for biobanks. South African Medical Journal. 109 (4), pp. 232-234. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v109i4.13617
"It’s about actually having a proactive regulatory framework versus a reactive one" - stakeholder perspectives on the governance of embryonic stem cell research in Ireland
Staunton, C. 2018. "It’s about actually having a proactive regulatory framework versus a reactive one" - stakeholder perspectives on the governance of embryonic stem cell research in Ireland. Medico-Legal Journal of Ireland. 24 (2), pp. 97-105.
Ethical and practical issues to consider in the governance of genomic and human research data and data sharing in South Africa: a meeting report
Staunton, C., Adams, R., Dove, E., Harrriman, N., Horn, L., Labuschaigne, M., Mulder, N., Olckers, A., Pope, A., Ramsay, M., Swanepoel, C., Ni Loideain, N. and deVries, J. 2019. Ethical and practical issues to consider in the governance of genomic and human research data and data sharing in South Africa: a meeting report. Open Research Africa. 2 (15), pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.12968.1
The regulation of stem cell research in Ireland: from the Commission on Assisted Human Reproduction to the Assisted Human Reproduction Bill 2017
Staunton, C. 2018. The regulation of stem cell research in Ireland: from the Commission on Assisted Human Reproduction to the Assisted Human Reproduction Bill 2017. Medical Law International. 18 (1), pp. 35-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533218764543
Data mining and biological sample exportation from South Africa: a new wave of bioexploitation under the guise of clinical care?
Staunton, C. and Moodley, K. 2016. Data mining and biological sample exportation from South Africa: a new wave of bioexploitation under the guise of clinical care? South African Medical Journal. 106 (2), pp. 136-138. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i2.10248
Rules of engagement: perspectives on stakeholder engagement for genomic biobanking research in South Africa
Staunton, C., Tindana, P., Hendricks, M. and Moodley, K. 2018. Rules of engagement: perspectives on stakeholder engagement for genomic biobanking research in South Africa. BMC Medical Ethics. 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0252-y
Informed consent for HIV cure research in South Africa: issues to consider
Staunton, C. 2015. Informed consent for HIV cure research in South Africa: issues to consider. BMC Medical Ethics. 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-16-3
Synergies, tensions and challenges in HIV prevention, treatment and cure research: exploratory conversations with HIV experts in South Africa
Moodley, K., Rossouw, T., Staunton, C. and Colvin, C. 2016. Synergies, tensions and challenges in HIV prevention, treatment and cure research: exploratory conversations with HIV experts in South Africa. BMC Medical Ethics. 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0109-1
Harmonisation of Biobank Regulations in Africa: lessons to be learned from Europe
Staunton, C. 2016. Harmonisation of Biobank Regulations in Africa: lessons to be learned from Europe. Contemporary Issues in Law. 13 (4), pp. 267-286.
The implications of Methylphenidate use by healthy medical students and doctors in South Africa
Beyer, C., Staunton, C. and Moodley, K. 2014. The implications of Methylphenidate use by healthy medical students and doctors in South Africa. BMC Medical Ethics. 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-20
Features: Community engagement for biobanking research: perspectives from Africa
Staunton, C. and Moodley, K. 2016. Features: Community engagement for biobanking research: perspectives from Africa. Asia Pacific Biotech News. 20 (2), pp. 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219030316000100
Ethical challenges in developing an educational video to empower potential participants during consent processes in future HIV cure research in South Africa
Staunton, C., de Roubaix, M., Baatjies, D., Black, G., Hendricks, M., Rossouw, T. and Moodley, K. 2018. Ethical challenges in developing an educational video to empower potential participants during consent processes in future HIV cure research in South Africa. Journal of Virus Eradication. 4 (2), pp. 99-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2055-6640(20)30251-X
Impact of an educational video as a consent tool on knowledge about cure research among patients and caregivers at HIV clinics in South Africa
Hendricks, M., Nair, G., Staunton, C., Pather, M., Garrett, N., Baatjies, D., Kidd, M. and Moodley, K. 2018. Impact of an educational video as a consent tool on knowledge about cure research among patients and caregivers at HIV clinics in South Africa. Journal of Virus Eradication. 4 (2), pp. 103-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2055-6640(20)30252-1
Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries
de Vries, J., Munung, S. N., Matimba, A., McCurdy, S., Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer, O., Staunton, C., Yakubu, A. and Tindana, P. 2017. Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries. BMC Medical Ethics. 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0165-6