Appropriate safeguards and Article 89 of the GDPR: considerations for biobank, databank and genetic research

Article


Staunton, C., Slokenberga, S., Parziale, A. and Mascalzoni, D. 2022. Appropriate safeguards and Article 89 of the GDPR: considerations for biobank, databank and genetic research. Frontiers in Genetics. 13, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.719317
TypeArticle
TitleAppropriate safeguards and Article 89 of the GDPR: considerations for biobank, databank and genetic research
AuthorsStaunton, C., Slokenberga, S., Parziale, A. and Mascalzoni, D.
Abstract

The collection and use of biological samples and data for genetic research, or for storage in a biobank or databank for future research, impacts upon many fundamental rights, including the right to dignity, the right to private and family life, the right to protection of personal data, the right to freedom of arts and sciences, and the right to non-discrimination. The use of genetic data and other health-related data in this context must be used in a manner that is rooted in human rights. Owing in part to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) coming into force, the right to the protection of personal data in the context of scientific research has been afforded increasing attention. The GDPR gives effect to the right to data protection, but states that this right must be balanced against other rights and interests. The GDPR applies to all personal data, with specific attention to special categories of data, that includes health and genetic data. The collection, access to, and sharing of such data must comply with the GDPR, and therefore directly impacts the use of such data in research. The GDPR does provide for several derogations and exemptions for research from many of the strict processing requirements. Such derogations are permitted only if there are appropriate safeguards in place. Article 89 states that to be appropriate, safeguards must be “in accordance” with the GDPR “for the rights and freedoms of the data subject”. In particular, those safeguards must ensure “respect for the principle of data minimisation”. Despite the importance of safeguards, the GDPR is silent as to the specific measures that may be adopted to meet these requirements. This paper considers Article 89 and explores safeguards that may be deemed appropriate in the context of biobanks, databanks, and genetic research.

KeywordsGenetics, GDPR–general data protection regulation, biobank, genetic research, safeguards, consent, ethics review and governance
PublisherFrontiers Media S.A.
JournalFrontiers in Genetics
ISSN1664-8021
Publication dates
Print18 Feb 2022
Publication process dates
Deposited07 Mar 2022
Accepted01 Jan 2022
Output statusPublished
Publisher's version
License
Copyright Statement

Copyright © 2022 Staunton, Slokenberga, Parziale and Mascalzoni. This is an openaccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms

Additional information

Specialty section: This article was submitted to ELSI in Science and Genetics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.719317
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/89v28

Download files

  • 50
    total views
  • 31
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Return of research results (RoRR) to the healthy CHRIS cohort: designing a policy with the participants
Staunton, C., Kösters, M., Pramstaller, P. and Mascalzoni, D. 2021. Return of research results (RoRR) to the healthy CHRIS cohort: designing a policy with the participants. Journal of Community Genetics. 12 (4), pp. 577-592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-021-00536-1
Balancing scientific interests and the rights of participants in designing a recall by genotype study
Mascalzoni, D., Biasiotto, R., Borsche, M., Brüggemann, N., De Grandi, A., Goegele, M., Frygner-Holm, S., Klein, C., Kösters, M., Staunton, C., Pramstaller, P., Krawczak, M. and Hicks, A. 2021. Balancing scientific interests and the rights of participants in designing a recall by genotype study. European Journal of Human Genetics. 29 (7), pp. 1146-1157. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00860-7
The governance of personal data for COVID-19 response: perspective from the access to COVID-19 tools accelerator
Staunton, C., Hannay, E., John, O., Johnson, M., Kadam, R., Sampath, R., ACT-Accelerator R&D and Digital Working Group 2021. The governance of personal data for COVID-19 response: perspective from the access to COVID-19 tools accelerator. BMJ Global Health. 6 (5), pp. 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006095
Public involvement in the governance of population-level biomedical research: unresolved questions and future directions
Erikainen, S., Friesen, P., Rand, L., Jongsma, K., Dunn, M., Sorbie, A., McCoy, M., Bell, J., Burgess, M., Chen, H., Chico, V., Cunningham-Burley, S., Darbyshire, J., Dawson, R., Evans, A., Fahy, N., Finlay, T., Frith, L., Goldenberg, A., Hinton, L., Hoppe, N., Hughes, N., Koenig, B., Lignou, S., McGowan, M., Parker, M., Prainsack, B., Shabani, M., Staunton, C., Thompson, R., Varnai, K., Vayena, E., Williams, O., Williamson, M., Chan, S. and Sheehan, M. 2021. Public involvement in the governance of population-level biomedical research: unresolved questions and future directions. Journal of Medical Ethics. 47 (7), pp. 522-525. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106530
Engaging research ethics committees to develop an ethics and governance framework for best practices in genomic research and biobanking in Africa: the H3Africa model [Commentary]
Tindana, P., Yakubu, A., Staunton, C., Matimba, A., Littler, K., Madden, E., Munung, N. and de Vries, J. 2019. Engaging research ethics committees to develop an ethics and governance framework for best practices in genomic research and biobanking in Africa: the H3Africa model [Commentary]. BMC Medical Ethics. 20 (1), p. 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0398-2
The governance of genomic biobank research in Africa: reframing the regulatory tilt
Staunton, C. and de Vries, J. 2020. The governance of genomic biobank research in Africa: reframing the regulatory tilt. Journal of Law and Biosciences. 0, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsz018
Between a rock and a hard place: COVID-19 and South Africa’s response
Staunton, C., Swanepoel, C. and Labuschagine, M. 2020. Between a rock and a hard place: COVID-19 and South Africa’s response. Journal of Law and the Biosciences. 7 (1), pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa052
Protection of Personal Information Act 2013 and data protection for health research in South Africa
Staunton, C., Adams, R., Anderson, D., Croxton, T., Kamuya, D., Munene, M. and Swanepoel, C. 2020. Protection of Personal Information Act 2013 and data protection for health research in South Africa. International Data Privacy Law Journal. 10 (2), pp. 160-179. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipz024
Safeguarding the future of genomic research in South Africa: Broad consent and the protection of Personal Information Act No. 4 of 2013
Staunton, C., Adams, R., Botes, M., Dove, E., Horn, L., Labuschaigne, M., Loots, G., Mahomed, S., Makuba, J., Olckers, A., Pepper, M., Pope, A., Ramsay, M., Loideain, N. and De Vries, J. 2019. Safeguarding the future of genomic research in South Africa: Broad consent and the protection of Personal Information Act No. 4 of 2013. South African Medical Journal. 109 (7), pp. 468-470. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v109i7.14148
Negotiating requests for reimbursement for community engagement: challenges in developing an educational video for genomic biobanking research in South Africa
Staunton, C., Abayomi, A., Bassa, F. and Moodley, K. 2019. Negotiating requests for reimbursement for community engagement: challenges in developing an educational video for genomic biobanking research in South Africa. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619856223
The GDPR and the research exemption: considerations on the necessary safeguards for research biobanks
Staunton, C., Slokenberga, S. and Mascalzoni, D. 2019. The GDPR and the research exemption: considerations on the necessary safeguards for research biobanks. European Journal of Human Genetics. 27 (8), pp. 1159-1167. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0386-5
Protection of personal information Act No. 4 of 2013: Implications for biobanks
Staunton, C. and De Stadler, E. 2019. Protection of personal information Act No. 4 of 2013: Implications for biobanks. South African Medical Journal. 109 (4), pp. 232-234. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v109i4.13617
"It’s about actually having a proactive regulatory framework versus a reactive one" - stakeholder perspectives on the governance of embryonic stem cell research in Ireland
Staunton, C. 2018. "It’s about actually having a proactive regulatory framework versus a reactive one" - stakeholder perspectives on the governance of embryonic stem cell research in Ireland. Medico-Legal Journal of Ireland. 24 (2), pp. 97-105.
Ethical and practical issues to consider in the governance of genomic and human research data and data sharing in South Africa: a meeting report
Staunton, C., Adams, R., Dove, E., Harrriman, N., Horn, L., Labuschaigne, M., Mulder, N., Olckers, A., Pope, A., Ramsay, M., Swanepoel, C., Ni Loideain, N. and deVries, J. 2019. Ethical and practical issues to consider in the governance of genomic and human research data and data sharing in South Africa: a meeting report. Open Research Africa. 2 (15), pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.12968.1
The regulation of stem cell research in Ireland: from the Commission on Assisted Human Reproduction to the Assisted Human Reproduction Bill 2017
Staunton, C. 2018. The regulation of stem cell research in Ireland: from the Commission on Assisted Human Reproduction to the Assisted Human Reproduction Bill 2017. Medical Law International. 18 (1), pp. 35-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533218764543
Data mining and biological sample exportation from South Africa: a new wave of bioexploitation under the guise of clinical care?
Staunton, C. and Moodley, K. 2016. Data mining and biological sample exportation from South Africa: a new wave of bioexploitation under the guise of clinical care? South African Medical Journal. 106 (2), pp. 136-138. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i2.10248
Rules of engagement: perspectives on stakeholder engagement for genomic biobanking research in South Africa
Staunton, C., Tindana, P., Hendricks, M. and Moodley, K. 2018. Rules of engagement: perspectives on stakeholder engagement for genomic biobanking research in South Africa. BMC Medical Ethics. 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0252-y
Informed consent for HIV cure research in South Africa: issues to consider
Staunton, C. 2015. Informed consent for HIV cure research in South Africa: issues to consider. BMC Medical Ethics. 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-16-3
Synergies, tensions and challenges in HIV prevention, treatment and cure research: exploratory conversations with HIV experts in South Africa
Moodley, K., Rossouw, T., Staunton, C. and Colvin, C. 2016. Synergies, tensions and challenges in HIV prevention, treatment and cure research: exploratory conversations with HIV experts in South Africa. BMC Medical Ethics. 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0109-1
Harmonisation of Biobank Regulations in Africa: lessons to be learned from Europe
Staunton, C. 2016. Harmonisation of Biobank Regulations in Africa: lessons to be learned from Europe. Contemporary Issues in Law. 13 (4), pp. 267-286.
The implications of Methylphenidate use by healthy medical students and doctors in South Africa
Beyer, C., Staunton, C. and Moodley, K. 2014. The implications of Methylphenidate use by healthy medical students and doctors in South Africa. BMC Medical Ethics. 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-20
Features: Community engagement for biobanking research: perspectives from Africa
Staunton, C. and Moodley, K. 2016. Features: Community engagement for biobanking research: perspectives from Africa. Asia Pacific Biotech News. 20 (2), pp. 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219030316000100
Ethical challenges in developing an educational video to empower potential participants during consent processes in future HIV cure research in South Africa
Staunton, C., de Roubaix, M., Baatjies, D., Black, G., Hendricks, M., Rossouw, T. and Moodley, K. 2018. Ethical challenges in developing an educational video to empower potential participants during consent processes in future HIV cure research in South Africa. Journal of Virus Eradication. 4 (2), pp. 99-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2055-6640(20)30251-X
Impact of an educational video as a consent tool on knowledge about cure research among patients and caregivers at HIV clinics in South Africa
Hendricks, M., Nair, G., Staunton, C., Pather, M., Garrett, N., Baatjies, D., Kidd, M. and Moodley, K. 2018. Impact of an educational video as a consent tool on knowledge about cure research among patients and caregivers at HIV clinics in South Africa. Journal of Virus Eradication. 4 (2), pp. 103-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2055-6640(20)30252-1
Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries
de Vries, J., Munung, S. N., Matimba, A., McCurdy, S., Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer, O., Staunton, C., Yakubu, A. and Tindana, P. 2017. Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries. BMC Medical Ethics. 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0165-6