Punctuated epistemology in international marketing strategy: a Whiteheadian remedy
Article
Poulis, K. 2020. Punctuated epistemology in international marketing strategy: a Whiteheadian remedy. Marketing Theory. 20 (3), pp. 363-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593119897938
| Type | Article |
|---|---|
| Title | Punctuated epistemology in international marketing strategy: a Whiteheadian remedy |
| Authors | Poulis, K. |
| Abstract | In this conceptual paper, I explicate the ‘punctuated epistemology’ that prevails in international marketing strategy (IMS) and I challenge the assumptions of a requisite punctuated ontology that is implied and nurtured by these epistemological commitments. I frame these assumptions under the terms “monochronic” and “monolithic” and articulate them through a paradigmatic case in point: the standardization versus adaptation debate. In turn, I argue that theorizing in international marketing can be enhanced through the adoption of another ontological stance. Specifically, inspired by the work of Alfred N. Whitehead, I propose an alternative commitment to a process ontology that takes account of ephemerality and mutual conditioning. By advancing the incorporation of metaphysics in international marketing research, I contribute in two broad ways: I promote a relationally embedded and time-sensitive understanding of IMS and highlight the value of philosophical considerations for theorizing purposes in our field. |
| Keywords | Adaptation; epistemology; international marketing; metaphysics; ontology; philosophy of science; process; standardisation |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications |
| Journal | Marketing Theory |
| ISSN | 1470-5931 |
| Electronic | 1741-301X |
| Publication dates | |
| Online | 07 Jan 2020 |
| 01 Sep 2020 | |
| Publication process dates | |
| Deposited | 29 Nov 2019 |
| Accepted | 09 Dec 2019 |
| Output status | Published |
| Accepted author manuscript | |
| Copyright Statement | Konstantinos Poulis, Punctuated epistemology in international marketing strategy: A Whiteheadian remedy, Marketing Theory. 2020; 20(3):363-38. Copyright © 2020 (The Author(s). DOI: 10.1177/1470593119897938 |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593119897938 |
| Web of Science identifier | WOS:000506761900001 |
| Language | English |
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/88q51
Download files
150
total views136
total downloads7
views this month2
downloads this month