Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: political, social and corporate influences

Article


Parsa, S., Narisa Tianjin, D., Ataur, B., Teng, L. and Guliang, T. 2021. Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: political, social and corporate influences. Accounting and Business Research. 51 (1), pp. 36-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2020.1780110
TypeArticle
TitleCorporate social responsibility reporting in China: political, social and corporate influences
AuthorsParsa, S., Narisa Tianjin, D., Ataur, B., Teng, L. and Guliang, T.
Abstract

This paper explores the main drivers of CSR and its reporting for large Chinese listed companies, and identifies the key institutional pressures and stakeholder influences that shape CSR and its reporting. The data were collected through interviews with managers from large listed Chinese companies. Our findings reveal how the Chinese government uses social organisations and social intermediaries to facilitate and mediate CSR and its reporting to meet changing societal expectations across regions, while ensuring that companies remain responsive to the expectations of international stakeholders. We find that CSR and its reporting help companies gain political legitimacy domestically, while retaining their legitimacy in global markets. Companies co-operate with social organisations and social intermediaries actively and continuously. This helped companies secure political legitimacy with the government, while helping officials maintain their social legitimacy. Our findings on regional differences support the idea that relations between Chinese business and society have a fundamental effect on CSR and its reporting.

Keywordsauthoritarian CSR; CSR reporting; China; institutional theory
PublisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)
JournalAccounting and Business Research
ISSN0001-4788
Electronic2159-4260
Publication dates
Online30 Jun 2020
Print02 Jan 2021
Publication process dates
Deposited09 Jun 2020
Accepted04 Jun 2020
Output statusPublished
Accepted author manuscript
Copyright Statement

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Accounting and Business Research on 30/06/2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00014788.2020.1780110

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2020.1780110
Web of Science identifierWOS:000549647500001
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/88z8x

  • 60
    total views
  • 9
    total downloads
  • 3
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Benevolent authoritarianism, paternalism and religious humanitarianism in Sri Lanka: a dependent or autonomous HR?
Hettiarachchi, C., Parsa, S. and Roper, I. 2024. Benevolent authoritarianism, paternalism and religious humanitarianism in Sri Lanka: a dependent or autonomous HR? The International Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2024.2421343
No poverty, zero hunger and human resource management
Roper, I., Parsa, S. and Hettiarachchi, C. 2024. No poverty, zero hunger and human resource management. in: Aust-Gronarz, I., Cooke, F. and Semeijn, J. (ed.) The Elgar Companion to Human Resource Management and the Sustainable Development Goals Edward Elgar Publishing.
Addressing challenges to labour rights reporting on global value chains: social governance mechanisms as a way forward
Parsa, S. and Werner, A. 2023. Addressing challenges to labour rights reporting on global value chains: social governance mechanisms as a way forward. in: Kacanski, S., Kabderian Dreyer, J. and Sund, K. (ed.) Measuring Sustainability and CSR: From Reporting to Decision-Making Cham, Switzerland. Springer. pp. 95-106
Soft law regulation and labour rights reporting: a deficit in moral legitimacy?
Parsa, S., Roper, I., Maurer, I. and Muller-Camen, M. 2023. Soft law regulation and labour rights reporting: a deficit in moral legitimacy? Accounting Forum. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2023.2250030
Transparency and disclosure in supply chains: modern slavery and worker voice
Parsa, S., Roper, I. and Hettiarachchi, C. 2022. Transparency and disclosure in supply chains: modern slavery and worker voice. UK Middlesex University, London & University of Essex, Colchester. https://doi.org/10.57685/EPRINTS.MDX.AC.UK.00034618
Corporate governance and HRM
Parsa, S. 2019. Corporate governance and HRM. in: Prouska, R., Roper, I. and Chatrakul Na Ayudhya, U. (ed.) Critical issues in human resource management: contemporary perspectives London Macmillan International Higher Education | Red Globe Press. pp. 9-27
Have labour practices and human rights disclosures enhanced corporate accountability? The case of the GRI framework
Parsa, S., Roper, I., Muller-Camen, M. and Szigetvari, E. 2018. Have labour practices and human rights disclosures enhanced corporate accountability? The case of the GRI framework. Accounting Forum. 42 (1), pp. 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2018.01.001
How do Chinese businesses view corporate social responsibility?
Parsa, S., Tang, G. and Dai, N. 2016. How do Chinese businesses view corporate social responsibility? London ICAEW.
Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world’s largest companies
Ehnert, I., Parsa, S., Roper, I., Wagner, M. and Muller-Camen, M. 2016. Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world’s largest companies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 27 (1), pp. 88-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157
Is there an expectations gap in the roles of independent directors? An explorative study of listed Chinese companies
Li, P., Parsa, S., Tang, G. and Xiao, J. 2012. Is there an expectations gap in the roles of independent directors? An explorative study of listed Chinese companies. British Journal of Management. 23 (2), pp. 206-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00727.x
The social audit of labour standards: what can it tell us about employer motivation to disclose?
Roper, I., Parsa, S. and Muller-Camen, M. 2011. The social audit of labour standards: what can it tell us about employer motivation to disclose? Across Boundaries: An Interdisciplinary Conference on the Global Challenges Facing Workers and Employment Research. BJIR 50th Anniversary Conference. London School of Economics 12 - 13 Dec 2011
Non-financial information disclosure and communication in large UK companies.
Parsa, S. 2001. Non-financial information disclosure and communication in large UK companies. PhD thesis Middlesex University Business School Business School
Capital markets: reactions to social information announcements
Parsa, S. and Deng, X. 2008. Capital markets: reactions to social information announcements. International Journal of Accounting and Finance. 1 (1), pp. 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAF.2008.020239
Corporate performance analysis and military production in South Africa
Batcholar, P., Dunne, J. and Parsa, S. 2000. Corporate performance analysis and military production in South Africa. Defence and peace economics. 11 (4), pp. 615-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/10430710008404970
Governance and social information disclosure - evidence from the UK
Parsa, S., Kouhy, R. and Tzovas, C. 2007. Governance and social information disclosure - evidence from the UK. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics. 3 (3), pp. 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2007.014313
Social reporting by companies listed on the Alternative Investment Market
Parsa, S. and Kouhy, R. 2007. Social reporting by companies listed on the Alternative Investment Market. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9402-8
Disclosure of social information by small/medium-sized companies.
Parsa, S. 2003. Disclosure of social information by small/medium-sized companies. Global Business & Economics Review. Anthol, pp. 90-104.
Disclosure of governance information by small and medium-sized companies
Parsa, S., Chong, G. and Isimoya, E. 2007. Disclosure of governance information by small and medium-sized companies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. 7 (5), pp. 635-648. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700710827211