Bridges over troubled waters: an interdisciplinary framework for evaluating the interconnectedness within fragmented domestic flood risk management systems

Article


Gilissen, H., Alexander, M., Beyers, J., Chmielewski, P., Matczak, P., Schellenberger, T. and Suykens, C. 2016. Bridges over troubled waters: an interdisciplinary framework for evaluating the interconnectedness within fragmented domestic flood risk management systems. Journal of Water Law. 25 (1), pp. 12-26.
TypeArticle
TitleBridges over troubled waters: an interdisciplinary framework for evaluating the interconnectedness within fragmented domestic flood risk management systems
AuthorsGilissen, H., Alexander, M., Beyers, J., Chmielewski, P., Matczak, P., Schellenberger, T. and Suykens, C.
Abstract

Diversification of strategies in Flood Risk Management (FRM) is widely regarded as a necessary step forward in terms of lessening the likelihood and magnitude of flooding, as well as minimizing the exposure of people and property, and in turn the disruption, economic damage, health impacts and other adverse consequences that ensue when floods occur. Thus, diversification is often heralded as an essential condition for enhancing societal resilience to flooding. However, an inevitable consequence of diversifying strategies and practices in FRM is that it can lead to fragmentation within FRM systems, in terms of the distribution of responsibilities between actors and governing rules enacted within different policy domains. This can prove detrimental to the effectiveness of FRM.
Building upon the notion of fragmentation developed in legal and governance literature, this paper introduces the concept of ‘bridging mechanisms’, i.e. instruments that remedy fragmentation by enhancing interconnectedness between relevant actors through information transfer, coordination and cooperation. This paper develops a typology of both fragmentation and bridging mechanisms and analyzes their relations, partly drawing upon empirical research conducted within the EU ‘STAR-FLOOD’ project. In turn, this paper outlines a novel interdisciplinary methodological framework for evaluating the degree and quality of the interconnectedness within fragmented domestic FRM systems. A pragmatic, flexible and broadly applicable tool, this framework is both suited for academic purposes, as well as for practically oriented analysis and (re)development of fragmented FRM systems, and potentially other fragmented systems, within the EU and abroad.

Research GroupFlood Hazard Research Centre
PublisherLawtext Publishing
JournalJournal of Water Law
ISSN1478-5277
Publication dates
Print01 Jul 2016
Publication process dates
Deposited20 Jun 2016
Accepted10 May 2016
Output statusPublished
Accepted author manuscript
License
Copyright Statement

This is the author-produced PDF of an article, accepted for publication in Journal of Water Law, following peer review. The Version of Record Gilissen, Herman Kasper and Alexander, Meghan and Beyers, Jean-Christophe and Chmielewski, Piotr and Matczak, Piotr and Schellenberger, Thomas and Suykens, Cathy (2016) Bridges over troubled waters: an interdisciplinary framework for evaluating the interconnectedness within fragmented domestic flood risk management systems, is available in Journal of Water Law, 25 (1).12-26. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0.

LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/8675x

Download files

  • 26
    total views
  • 19
    total downloads
  • 4
    views this month
  • 2
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Cross-sectoral coordination and integration: journey planner 3
Priest, S. and Alexander, M. 2021. Cross-sectoral coordination and integration: journey planner 3. UK Environment Agency.
A journey towards accountable and legitimate partnerships, Journey planner on internal partnership dynamics
Priest, S. and Alexander, M. 2021. A journey towards accountable and legitimate partnerships, Journey planner on internal partnership dynamics. Environment Agency.
A journey towards accountable and legitimate partnerships, Journey planner for legitimate partnerships
Priest, S. and Alexander, M. 2021. A journey towards accountable and legitimate partnerships, Journey planner for legitimate partnerships. Environment Agency.
Self-assessment framework: measuring the effectiveness of partnership governance arrangements
Alexander, M. and Priest, S. 2021. Self-assessment framework: measuring the effectiveness of partnership governance arrangements. Environment Agency.
Evaluating the effectiveness of flood and coastal erosion risk governance in England and Wales
Alexander, M., Priest, S., Penning-Rowsell, E. and Cobbing, P. 2021. Evaluating the effectiveness of flood and coastal erosion risk governance in England and Wales. Bristol, UK Environment Agency.
Supporting flood and coastal erosion risk management through partnerships: key lessons
Priest, S., Alexander, M., McCarthy, S., Penning-Rowsell, E., Cumiskey, L. and Cobbing, P. 2021. Supporting flood and coastal erosion risk management through partnerships: key lessons. Bristol, UK Environment Agency.
Shaping flood risk governance through science-policy interfaces: Insights from England, France and The Netherlands
Hegger, D., Alexander, M., Raadgever, G., Priest, S. and Bruzzone, S. 2020. Shaping flood risk governance through science-policy interfaces: Insights from England, France and The Netherlands. Environmental Science & Policy. 106, pp. 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.002
A framework linking ecosystem services and human well‐being: Saltmarsh as a case study
Rendón, O., Garbutt, A., Skov, M., Möller, I., Alexander, M., Ballinger, R., Wyles, K., Smith, G., McKinley, E., Griffin, J., Thomas, M., Davidson, K., Pagès, J., Read, S. and Beaumont, N. 2019. A framework linking ecosystem services and human well‐being: Saltmarsh as a case study. People and Nature. 1 (4), pp. 486-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10050
The risk of ill-informed reform: the future for English flood risk management
Alexander, M., Priest, S. and Penning-Rowsell, E. 2018. The risk of ill-informed reform: the future for English flood risk management. Area. 50 (3), pp. 426-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12393
Assessing the legitimacy of flood risk governance arrangements in Europe: insights from intra-country evaluations
Pettersson, M., Van Rijswick, M., Suykens, C., Alexander, M., Ek, K. and Priest, S. 2017. Assessing the legitimacy of flood risk governance arrangements in Europe: insights from intra-country evaluations. Water International. 42 (8), pp. 929-944. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2017.1393716
Bridging the legitimacy gap—translating theory into practical signposts for legitimate flood risk governance
Alexander, M., Doorn, N. and Priest, S. 2018. Bridging the legitimacy gap—translating theory into practical signposts for legitimate flood risk governance. Regional Environmental Change. 18 (2), pp. 397-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1195-4
A framework for evaluating flood risk governance
Alexander, M., Priest, S. and Mees, H. 2016. A framework for evaluating flood risk governance. Environmental Science & Policy. 64, pp. 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.004
Coproducing flood risk management through citizen involvement: insights from cross-country comparison in Europe
Mees, H., Crabbé, A., Alexander, M., Kaufmann, M., Bruzzone, S., Lévy, L. and Lewandowski, J. 2016. Coproducing flood risk management through citizen involvement: insights from cross-country comparison in Europe. Ecology & Society. 21 (3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08500-210307
Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in England – enhancing societal resilience through comprehensive and aligned flood risk governance arrangements
Alexander, M., Priest, S., Micou, P., Tapsell, S., Green, C., Parker, D. and Homewood, S. 2016. Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in England – enhancing societal resilience through comprehensive and aligned flood risk governance arrangements. Middlesex University.
Social vulnerability to natural hazards
Tapsell, S., McCarthy, S., Faulkner, H., Alexander, M., Steinführer, A., Kuhlicke, C., Brown, S., Walker, G., Pellizzoni, L., Scolobig, A., De Marchi, B., Bianchizza, C., Supramaniam, M. and Kallis, G. 2010. Social vulnerability to natural hazards. European Commission.
Constructions of flood vulnerability across an etic-emic spectrum
Alexander, M. 2014. Constructions of flood vulnerability across an etic-emic spectrum. PhD thesis Middlesex University Flood Hazard Research Centre
Translating the complexities of flood risk science using KEEPER - a knowledge exchange exploratory tool for professionals in emergency response
Alexander, M., Viavattene, C., Faulkner, H. and Priest, S. 2014. Translating the complexities of flood risk science using KEEPER - a knowledge exchange exploratory tool for professionals in emergency response. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 7 (3), pp. 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12042