Assessing the legitimacy of flood risk governance arrangements in Europe: insights from intra-country evaluations
Article
Pettersson, M., Van Rijswick, M., Suykens, C., Alexander, M., Ek, K. and Priest, S. 2017. Assessing the legitimacy of flood risk governance arrangements in Europe: insights from intra-country evaluations. Water International. 42 (8), pp. 929-944. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2017.1393716
Type | Article |
---|---|
Title | Assessing the legitimacy of flood risk governance arrangements in Europe: insights from intra-country evaluations |
Authors | Pettersson, M., Van Rijswick, M., Suykens, C., Alexander, M., Ek, K. and Priest, S. |
Abstract | Legitimacy has received comparatively less attention than societal resilience in the context of flooding, thus methods for assessing and monitoring the legitimacy of Flood Risk Governance Arrangements (FRGA) are noticeably lacking. This study attempts to address this gap by assessing the legitimacy of FRGAs in six European countries through cross-disciplinary and comparative research methods. On the basis of this assessment, recommendations |
Research Group | Flood Hazard Research Centre |
Publisher | Routledge |
Journal | Water International |
ISSN | 0250-8060 |
Publication dates | |
Online | 13 Nov 2017 |
17 Nov 2017 | |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 23 Oct 2017 |
Accepted | 15 Oct 2017 |
Output status | Published |
Publisher's version | License |
Accepted author manuscript | |
Copyright Statement | Final accepted version: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Water International on 13/11/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02508060.2017.1393716 |
Additional information | STAR-FLOOD (http://www.starflood.eu/) This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration under Grant Agreement No 308364. |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2017.1393716 |
Language | English |
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/873v7
Download files
Publisher's version
AssessingTheLegitimacyOfFloodRiskGovernanceArrangementsInEuropeInsightsFromIntraCountryEvaluations.pdf | ||
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 |
Accepted author manuscript
44
total views26
total downloads1
views this month0
downloads this month
Export as
Related outputs
The role of different types of knowledge and expertise in explaining recognition justice in flood defence and flood risk prevention
Paauw, M., Crabbe, A., Guevara Viquez, S. and Priest, S. 2025. The role of different types of knowledge and expertise in explaining recognition justice in flood defence and flood risk prevention. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 18 (1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.13040Recognition of differences in the capacity to deal with floods—A cross-country comparison of flood risk management
Pauuw, M., Smith, G., Crabbé, A., Fournier, M., Munck af Rosenschöld, J., Priest, S. and Rekola, A. 2025. Recognition of differences in the capacity to deal with floods—A cross-country comparison of flood risk management. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 18 (1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12965Revised approach for the calculation of groundwater flooding annual average damages: establishing a probability-based relationship for groundwater flooding
Viavattene, C., Hardman, D., Penning-Rowsell, E., Morris, J., Chatterton, J., Parker, D. and Priest, S. 2024. Revised approach for the calculation of groundwater flooding annual average damages: establishing a probability-based relationship for groundwater flooding. Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University.Tailored flood risk communication: residents’ perspectives as starting point
Snel, K., Priest, S., Hartmann, T., Witte, P. and Geertman, S. 2024. Tailored flood risk communication: residents’ perspectives as starting point. Nature and Culture. 19 (3), pp. 297-327. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2024.190304data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b68a9/b68a90763bb9157955dc7867498e55a43fbfddfb" alt=""