A framework to assess integration in flood risk management: implications for governance, policy, and practice

Article


Cumiskey, L., Priest, S., Klijn, F. and Juntti, M. 2019. A framework to assess integration in flood risk management: implications for governance, policy, and practice. Ecology and Society. 24 (4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11298-240417
TypeArticle
TitleA framework to assess integration in flood risk management: implications for governance, policy, and practice
AuthorsCumiskey, L., Priest, S., Klijn, F. and Juntti, M.
Abstract

Over decades the concept of integration has been promoted to enhance alignment between policy domains, and to manage trade-offs and maximize synergies across management practices. Integrated approaches have the potential to enable better outcomes for flood risk management (FRM) and society as a whole. However, achieving integration in practice is a recurring challenge, especially for FRM where multiple actors need to work together across fragmented policy domains. To disentangle this complexity of integration, a framework is proposed for assessing integration and identifying different degrees of integration. This framework is based on evidence from a literature review, 50 interviews with FRM-related professionals in England, and participant observation at 24 meetings relevant for FRM. The framework sets out the context of integration, assesses the governance capacity for integration through the strength of relationships between different types of actors (bridging, bonding, and linking) and the mechanisms (actor-, rule- and resource-based) that influence them, and the realization of integration in practice through knowledge, policies, and interventions. The framework is applied for FRM in England and used to identify degrees of integration: high, intermediate, low, and minimal. An important characteristic of the framework is the interconnectivity between the governance capacity and realization of integration. The framework provides further theoretical insights into the concept of integration, while offering an approach for researchers, policy makers, and practitioners to recognize current degrees of integration in FRM and identify the critical elements for improvement. It is recommended that further research and practice-based applications of the framework are completed in different geographical and institutional contexts. Specifically, such applications can create further understanding of the interactions and dependencies between elements of the governance capacity and realization of integration.

KeywordsAssessment framework; governance; integrated flood risk management; integration; policy
Research GroupFlood Hazard Research Centre
LanguageEnglish
PublisherResilience Alliance
JournalEcology and Society
ISSN1708-3087
Electronic1708-3087
Publication dates
Online06 Nov 2019
Print31 Dec 2019
Publication process dates
Deposited07 Nov 2019
Accepted23 Oct 2019
Output statusPublished
Publisher's version
License
Copyright Statement

Copyright © 2019 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11298-240417
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/88930

Download files

  • 152
    total views
  • 75
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 2
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

The global biodiversity challenge
Juntti, M., Castellino, J. and Forero, O. 2024. The global biodiversity challenge. Planning Theory & Practice. 25 (1), pp. 103-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2024.2322879
Recognition of differences in the capacity to deal with floods—A cross-country comparison of flood risk management
Pauuw, M., Smith, G., Crabbé, A., Fournier, M., Munck af Rosenschöld, J., Priest, S. and Rekola, A. 2024. Recognition of differences in the capacity to deal with floods—A cross-country comparison of flood risk management. Journal of Flood Risk Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12965
Blue carbon: challenges for definition, valuation and governance
Luisetti, T., McHarg, E., Smith, G., Parker, R., Juntti, M. and Benson, L. 2023. Blue carbon: challenges for definition, valuation and governance. in: Treatise on Estuarine and Coastal Science Elsevier.
Factors influencing the realisation of the social impact of urban nature in inner-city environments: A systematic review of complex evidence
Juntti, M. and Ozsezer-Kurnuc, S. 2023. Factors influencing the realisation of the social impact of urban nature in inner-city environments: A systematic review of complex evidence. Ecological Economics. 211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107872
Flood risk research for improving flood risk outcomes
Priest, S. 2023. Flood risk research for improving flood risk outcomes. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12888
On the horns of a dilemma: experts as communicators for property-level flood risk adaptation measures
Davids, P., Priest, S. and Hartmann, T. 2023. On the horns of a dilemma: experts as communicators for property-level flood risk adaptation measures. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 16 (2). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12881
Wastewater monitoring for detection of public health markers during the COVID-19 pandemic: Near-source monitoring of schools in England over an academic year
Hassard, F., Vu, M., Rahimzadeh, S., Castro-Gutierrez, V., Stanton, I., Burczynska, B., Wildeboer, D., Baio, G., Brown, M., Garelick, H., Hofman, J., Kasprzyk-Hordern, B., Majeed, A., Priest, S., Denise, H., Khalifa, M., Bassano, I., Wade, M., Grimsley, J., Lundy, L., Singer, A. and Di Cesare, M. 2023. Wastewater monitoring for detection of public health markers during the COVID-19 pandemic: Near-source monitoring of schools in England over an academic year. PLoS ONE. 18 (5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286259
Emergency first responders and professional wellbeing: a qualitative systematic review
Bevan, M., Priest, S., Plume, R. and Wilson, E. 2022. Emergency first responders and professional wellbeing: a qualitative systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19 (22). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214649
Flood and coastal erosion risk management research and development framework: working with communities
Twigger-Ross, C., Sadauskis, R., Orr, P., Jones, R., McCarthy, S., Parker, D., Priest, S. and Simms, J. 2021. Flood and coastal erosion risk management research and development framework: working with communities. Bristol, UK Environment Agency.
Flood and coastal erosion risk management research and development framework: working with communities: literature review
Twigger-Ross, C., Sadauskis, R., Orr, P., Jones, R., McCarthy, S., Parker, D., Priest, S. and Simms, J. 2021. Flood and coastal erosion risk management research and development framework: working with communities: literature review. Bristol, UK Environment Agency.
Cross-sectoral coordination and integration: journey planner 3
Priest, S. and Alexander, M. 2021. Cross-sectoral coordination and integration: journey planner 3. UK Environment Agency.
A journey towards accountable and legitimate partnerships, Journey planner on internal partnership dynamics
Priest, S. and Alexander, M. 2021. A journey towards accountable and legitimate partnerships, Journey planner on internal partnership dynamics. Environment Agency.
A journey towards accountable and legitimate partnerships, Journey planner for legitimate partnerships
Priest, S. and Alexander, M. 2021. A journey towards accountable and legitimate partnerships, Journey planner for legitimate partnerships. Environment Agency.
Self-assessment framework: measuring the effectiveness of partnership governance arrangements
Alexander, M. and Priest, S. 2021. Self-assessment framework: measuring the effectiveness of partnership governance arrangements. Environment Agency.
Evaluating the effectiveness of flood and coastal erosion risk governance in England and Wales
Alexander, M., Priest, S., Penning-Rowsell, E. and Cobbing, P. 2021. Evaluating the effectiveness of flood and coastal erosion risk governance in England and Wales. Bristol, UK Environment Agency.
Forward: spatial flood risk management: implementing catchment-based retention and resilience on private land
Priest, S. 2022. Forward: spatial flood risk management: implementing catchment-based retention and resilience on private land. in: Hartmann, T., Slavíková, L. and Wilkinson, M. (ed.) Spatial Flood Risk Management: Implementing Catchment-based Retention and Resilience on Private Land Edward Elgar Publishing.
Strategic use of instruments of land policy for mobilising private land for flood risk management
Löschner, L., Hartmann, T., Priest, S. and Collentine, D. 2021. Strategic use of instruments of land policy for mobilising private land for flood risk management. Environmental Science and Policy. 118, pp. 45-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.01.009
Monitoring occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in school populations: A wastewater-based approach
Castro-Gutierrez, V., Hassard, F., Vu, M., Leitao, R., Burczynska, B., Wildeboer, D., Stanton, I., Rahimzadeh, S., Baio, G., Garelick, H., Hofman, J., Kasprzyk-Hordern, B., Kwiatkowska, R., Majeed, A., Priest, S., Grimsley, J., Lundy, L., Singer, A. and Di Cesare, M. 2022. Monitoring occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in school populations: A wastewater-based approach. PLoS ONE. 17 (6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270168
Flood risk management through a resilience lens
de Bruijn, K., Jafino, B., Merz, B., Doorn, N., Priest, S., Dahm, R., Zevenbergen, C., Aerts, J. and Comes, T. 2022. Flood risk management through a resilience lens. Communications Earth & Environment. 3 (1), pp. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00613-4
The social impact of urban nature in regeneration indicators & guidance 2020-2021
Juntti, M. and Ozsezer, S. 2022. The social impact of urban nature in regeneration indicators & guidance 2020-2021. London Development Trust.
Desertification: competing knowledge claims and land-management agendas
Juntti, M. 2022. Desertification: competing knowledge claims and land-management agendas. in: Harris, P. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Global Environmental Politics Routledge. pp. 579-592
Supporting flood and coastal erosion risk management through partnerships: key lessons
Priest, S., Alexander, M., McCarthy, S., Penning-Rowsell, E., Cumiskey, L. and Cobbing, P. 2021. Supporting flood and coastal erosion risk management through partnerships: key lessons. Bristol, UK Environment Agency.
Beyond agriculture: Alternative geographies of rural land investment and place effects across the United Kingdom
Livingstone, N., Gallent, N., Hamiduddin, I., Juntti, M. and Stirling, P. 2021. Beyond agriculture: Alternative geographies of rural land investment and place effects across the United Kingdom. Land. 10 (11). https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111153
Why understanding behaviour matters for flood risk management? Journal of Flood Risk Management, 14 (2) , e12724. ISSN 1753-318X
Priest, S. 2021. Why understanding behaviour matters for flood risk management? Journal of Flood Risk Management, 14 (2) , e12724. ISSN 1753-318X. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Needed: a systems approach to improve flood risk mitigation through private precautionary measures
Barendrecht, M., Sairam, N., Cumiskey, L., Metin, A., Holz, F., Priest, S. and Kreibich, H. 2020. Needed: a systems approach to improve flood risk mitigation through private precautionary measures. Water Security. 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100080
Win–win for everyone? Reflecting on nature-based solutions for flood risk management from an environmental justice perspective
Kaufmann, M., Priest, S., Hudson, P., Löschner, L., Raška, P., Schindelegger, A., Slavíková, L., Stričević, R. and Vleesenbeek, T. 2021. Win–win for everyone? Reflecting on nature-based solutions for flood risk management from an environmental justice perspective. in: Ferreira, C., Kalantari, Z., Hartmann, T. and Pereira, P. (ed.) Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Mitigation: Environmental and Socio-Economic Aspects Cham Springer.
'Do the resilient things.' Residents' perspectives on responsibilities for flood risk adaptation in England
Snel, K., Priest, S., Hartmann, T., Witte, P. and Geertman, S. 2021. 'Do the resilient things.' Residents' perspectives on responsibilities for flood risk adaptation in England. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 14 (3). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12727
Bayesian Data-Driven approach enhances synthetic flood loss models
Sairam, N., Schröter, K., Carisi, F., Wagenaar, D., Domeneghetti, A., Molinari, D., Brill, F., Priest, S., Viavattene, C., Merz, B. and Kreibich, H. 2020. Bayesian Data-Driven approach enhances synthetic flood loss models. Environmental Modelling and Software. 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104798
A method for monetising the mental health costs of flooding
Viavattene, C. and Priest, S. 2020. A method for monetising the mental health costs of flooding. Bristol, UK Environment Agency.
Shaping flood risk governance through science-policy interfaces: Insights from England, France and The Netherlands
Hegger, D., Alexander, M., Raadgever, G., Priest, S. and Bruzzone, S. 2020. Shaping flood risk governance through science-policy interfaces: Insights from England, France and The Netherlands. Environmental Science and Policy. 106, pp. 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.002
An agenda for ethics and justice in adaptation to climate change
Byskov, M., Hyams, K., Satyal, P., Anguelovski, I., Benjamin, L., Blackburn, S., Borie, M., Caney, S., Chu, E., Edwards, G., Fourie, K., Fraser, A., Heyward, C., Jeans, H., McQuistan, C., Paavola, J., Page, E., Pelling, M., Priest, S., Swiderska, K., Tarazona, M., Thornton, T., Twigg, J. and Venn, A. 2021. An agenda for ethics and justice in adaptation to climate change. Climate and Development. 13 (1), pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1700774
Practice based learning example: Brief Cases at Middlesex
Juntti, M. 2019. Practice based learning example: Brief Cases at Middlesex. Work Based Learning e-Journal International. 8 (2), pp. 106-109.
Sticks and carrots for reducing property-level risks from floods: an EU-US comparative perspective
Suykens, C., Tarlock, D., Priest, S., Van Doorn-Hoekveld, W. and Van Rijswick, H. 2019. Sticks and carrots for reducing property-level risks from floods: an EU-US comparative perspective. Water International. 44 (5), pp. 622-639. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2019.1640957
Urban environmental quality and wellbeing in the context of incomplete urbanization in Brazil: integrating directly experienced ecosystem services into planning
Juntti, M., Costa, H. and Nascimento, N. 2021. Urban environmental quality and wellbeing in the context of incomplete urbanization in Brazil: integrating directly experienced ecosystem services into planning. Progress in Planning. 143, pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2019.04.003
Governance strategies for improving flood resilience in the face of climate change
Driessen, P., Hegger, D., Kundzewicz, Z., Van Rijswick, H., Crabbé, A., Larrue, C., Matczak, P., Pettersson, M., Priest, S., Suykens, C., Raadgever, G. and Wiering, M. 2018. Governance strategies for improving flood resilience in the face of climate change. Water. 10 (11). https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111595
Payments for ecosystem services and the rural economy
Juntti, M. 2019. Payments for ecosystem services and the rural economy. in: Scott, M., Gallent, N. and Gkartzios, M. (ed.) Routledge Companion to Rural Planning London, UK Taylor & Francis (Routledge). pp. 209-218
New money in rural areas: land Investment in Europe and its place impacts
Gallent, N., Hamiduddin, I., Juntti, M., Livingstone, N. and Stirling, P. 2019. New money in rural areas: land Investment in Europe and its place impacts. London Palgrave Pivot.
European integration and rural development: actors, institutions and power [Book Review]
Juntti, M. 2016. European integration and rural development: actors, institutions and power [Book Review]. Town Planning Review. 87 (1), pp. 107-108. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2016.8
Towards evaluation criteria in participatory flood risk management
Maskrey, S., Priest, S. and Mount, N. 2019. Towards evaluation criteria in participatory flood risk management. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 12 (2), pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12462
New Money in Rural Areas: assessing the impacts of investment in rural land assets
Gallent, N., Hamiduddin, I., Juntti, M., Livingstone, N. and Stirling, P. 2018. New Money in Rural Areas: assessing the impacts of investment in rural land assets. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS).
Social justice in the context of adaptation to climate change – reflecting on different policy approaches to distribute and allocate flood risk management
Thaler, T., Fuchs, S., Priest, S. and Doorn, N. 2018. Social justice in the context of adaptation to climate change – reflecting on different policy approaches to distribute and allocate flood risk management. Regional Envrionmental Change. 18 (2), pp. 305-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1272-8
Evolutionary leap in large-scale flood risk assessment needed
Vorogushyn, S., Bates, P., de Bruijn, K., Castellarin, A., Kreibich, H., Priest, S., Schröter, K., Bagli, S., Blöschl, G., Domeneghetti, A., Gouldby, B., Klijn, F., Lammersen, R., Neal, J., Ridder, N., Terink, W., Viavattene, C., Viglione, A., Zanardo, S. and Merz, B. 2018. Evolutionary leap in large-scale flood risk assessment needed. WIREs Water. 5 (2), p. e1266. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1266
Managing urban flood resilience as a multi-level governance challenge: An analysis of required multi-level coordination mechanisms
Dieperink, C., Mees, H., Priest, S., Ek, K., Bruzzone, S., Larrue, C. and Matczak, P. 2018. Managing urban flood resilience as a multi-level governance challenge: An analysis of required multi-level coordination mechanisms. Ecology and Society. 23 (1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09962-230131
The risk of ill-informed reform: the future for English flood risk management
Alexander, M., Priest, S. and Penning-Rowsell, E. 2018. The risk of ill-informed reform: the future for English flood risk management. Area. 50 (3), pp. 426-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12393
Assessing the legitimacy of flood risk governance arrangements in Europe: insights from intra-country evaluations
Pettersson, M., Van Rijswick, M., Suykens, C., Alexander, M., Ek, K. and Priest, S. 2017. Assessing the legitimacy of flood risk governance arrangements in Europe: insights from intra-country evaluations. Water International. 42 (8), pp. 929-944. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2017.1393716
Selecting coastal hotspots to storm impacts at the regional scale: a Coastal Risk Assessment Framework
Viavattene, C., Jiménez, J., Ferreira, O., Priest, S., Owen, D. and McCall, R. 2018. Selecting coastal hotspots to storm impacts at the regional scale: a Coastal Risk Assessment Framework. Coastal Engineering. 134, pp. 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.09.002
A framework to include the (inter)dependencies of Disaster Risk Reduction measures in coastal risk assessment
Cumiskey, L., Priest, S., Valchev, N., Viavattene, C., Costas, S. and Clarke, J. 2018. A framework to include the (inter)dependencies of Disaster Risk Reduction measures in coastal risk assessment. Coastal Engineering. 134, pp. 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.08.009
Bridging the legitimacy gap—translating theory into practical signposts for legitimate flood risk governance
Alexander, M., Doorn, N. and Priest, S. 2018. Bridging the legitimacy gap—translating theory into practical signposts for legitimate flood risk governance. Regional Environmental Change. 18 (2), pp. 397-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1195-4
Interrogating sustainable productivism: lessons from the ‘Almerían miracle’
Juntti, M. and Downward, S. 2017. Interrogating sustainable productivism: lessons from the ‘Almerían miracle’. Land Use Policy. 66, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.016
Promoting adaptive flood risk management: the role and potential of flood recovery mechanisms
Priest, S., Penning-Rowsell, E. and Suykens, C. 2016. Promoting adaptive flood risk management: the role and potential of flood recovery mechanisms. FLOODrisk 2016 - 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management. Lyon, France 17 - 21 Oct 2016 EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160717005
Flood risk management and ‘fairness’: aspirations and reality
Penning-Rowsell, E., Priest, S. and King, D. 2016. Flood risk management and ‘fairness’: aspirations and reality. FLOODrisk 2016 - 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management. Lyon, France 17 - 21 Oct 2016 EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160724001
Partnership approaches in flood risk management: lessons from the Eastern Alps
Thaler, T., Priest, S. and Fuchs, S. 2016. Partnership approaches in flood risk management: lessons from the Eastern Alps. FLOODrisk 2016 - 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management. Lyon, France 17 - 21 Oct 2016 EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160720002
Partnership Funding in flood risk management: multi-level stakeholder engagement - a question of roles and power
Thaler, T. and Priest, S. 2016. Partnership Funding in flood risk management: multi-level stakeholder engagement - a question of roles and power. FLOODrisk 2016 - 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management. Lyon, France 17 - 21 Oct 2016 EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160720009
A mixed methods approach to urban ecosystem services: Experienced environmental quality and its role in ecosystem assessment within an inner-city estate
Juntti, M. and Lundy, L. 2017. A mixed methods approach to urban ecosystem services: Experienced environmental quality and its role in ecosystem assessment within an inner-city estate. Landscape and Urban Planning. 161, pp. 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.002
The undebated issue of justice: silent discourses in Dutch flood risk management
Kaufmann, M., Priest, S. and Leroy, P. 2018. The undebated issue of justice: silent discourses in Dutch flood risk management. Regional Environmental Change. 18 (2), pp. 325-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1086-0
Toward more flood resilience: is a diversification of flood risk management strategies the way forward?
Hegger, D., Driessen, P., Wiering, M., Van Rijswick, H., Kundzewicz, Z., Matczak, P., Crabbé, A., Raadgever, G., Bakker, M., Priest, S., Larrue, C. and Ek, K. 2016. Toward more flood resilience: is a diversification of flood risk management strategies the way forward? Ecology and Society. 21 (4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08854-210452
The European Union approach to flood risk management and improving societal resilience: lessons from the implementation of the Floods Directive in six European countries
Priest, S., Suykens, C., Van Rijswick, H., Schellenberger, T., Goytia, S., Kundzewicz, Z., Van Doorn-Hoekveld, W., Beyers, J. and Homewood, S. 2016. The European Union approach to flood risk management and improving societal resilience: lessons from the implementation of the Floods Directive in six European countries. Ecology and Society. 21 (4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08913-210450
Dealing with change and uncertainty within the regulatory frameworks for flood defense infrastructure in selected European countries
Goytia, S., Pettersson, M., Schellenberger, T., Van Doorn-Hoekveld, W. and Priest, S. 2016. Dealing with change and uncertainty within the regulatory frameworks for flood defense infrastructure in selected European countries. Ecology and Society. 21 (4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08908-210423
Dealing with flood damages: will prevention, mitigation and ex-post compensation provide for a resilient triangle?
Suykens, C., Priest, S., Van Doorn-Hoekveld, W., Thuillier, T. and Van Rijswick, M. 2016. Dealing with flood damages: will prevention, mitigation and ex-post compensation provide for a resilient triangle? Ecology and Society. 21 (4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08592-210401
A framework for evaluating flood risk governance
Alexander, M., Priest, S. and Mees, H. 2016. A framework for evaluating flood risk governance. Environmental Science and Policy. 64, pp. 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.004
INDRA model: for a better assessment of coastal events disruptions
Viavattene, C., Priest, S., Owen, D., Parker, D., Micou, P. and Ly, S. 2016. INDRA model: for a better assessment of coastal events disruptions. Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management. Rio De Janeiro Brazil May 2016
Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in England – enhancing societal resilience through comprehensive and aligned flood risk governance arrangements
Alexander, M., Priest, S., Micou, P., Tapsell, S., Green, C., Parker, D. and Homewood, S. 2016. Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in England – enhancing societal resilience through comprehensive and aligned flood risk governance arrangements. Middlesex University.
Coastal risk assessment framework guidance document
Viavattene, C., Jiménez, J., Owen, D., Priest, S., Parker, D., Micou, P. and Ly, S. 2015. Coastal risk assessment framework guidance document. None.
Introduction to rural planning: economies, communities and landscapes. 2nd ed.
Gallent, N., Hamiduddin, I., Juntti, M., Kidd, S. and Shaw, D. 2015. Introduction to rural planning: economies, communities and landscapes. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA Routledge.
Developing models to estimate the benefits from flood warnings
Parker, D., Priest, S., Schildt, A. and Handmer, J. 2008. Developing models to estimate the benefits from flood warnings. European Commission. https://doi.org/T10-07-12
Socio-economic and ecological evaluation and modelling methodologies
Tapsell, S., Priest, S., Parker, D., Penning-Rowsell, E., Viavattene, C., Wilson, T., Handmer, J., Wijdeveld, A., Haasnoot, M., Penailillo, R., van den Ende,, F., van Noort,, P., Messner,, F., Meyer, V., Haase, D., Scheuer, S., Schildt, A., Lutoff, C. and Ruin, I. 2008. Socio-economic and ecological evaluation and modelling methodologies. European Commission.
Developing models to estimate the benefits from flood warnings: executive summary
Parker, D., Priest, S., Tapsell, S., Handmer, J. and Schildt, A. 2008. Developing models to estimate the benefits from flood warnings: executive summary. European Commission. https://doi.org/T10-08-11
Building models to estimate loss of life for flood events: executive summary
Priest, S., Tapsell, S., Penning-Rowsell, E., Viavattene, C. and Wilson, T. 2008. Building models to estimate loss of life for flood events: executive summary. European Commission. https://doi.org/T10-08-10
Developing a conceptual model of flood impacts upon human health
Tapsell, S., Tunstall, S. and Priest, S. 2009. Developing a conceptual model of flood impacts upon human health. European Commission.
Building a model to estimate risk to life for European flood events – final report
Priest, S., Wilson, T., Tapsell, S., Penning-Rowsell, E., Viavattene, C. and Fernandez-Bilbao, A. 2007. Building a model to estimate risk to life for European flood events – final report. European Commission. https://doi.org/T10-07-10
Flood risk management in Europe: the flood problem and interventions
Green, C., Dieperink, K., Ek, K., Hegger, D., Pettersson, M., Priest, S. and Tapsell, S. 2013. Flood risk management in Europe: the flood problem and interventions. European Commission.
Evolving interregional co-operation in flood risk management: distances and types of partnership approaches in Austria
Thaler, T., Priest, S. and Fuchs, S. 2016. Evolving interregional co-operation in flood risk management: distances and types of partnership approaches in Austria. Regional Environmental Change. 16 (3), pp. 841-853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0796-z
Library of Coastal Vulnerability Indicators
Owen, D., Micou, P., Viavattene, C., Parker, D. and Priest, S. 2015. Library of Coastal Vulnerability Indicators. EU FP7 RISC-KIT Project.
Library of Coastal Vulnerability Indicators guidance document
Viavattene, C., Micou, P., Owen, D., Priest, S. and Parker, D. 2015. Library of Coastal Vulnerability Indicators guidance document. Middlesex University.
The rationales of resilience in English and Dutch flood risk policies
Wiering, M., Green, C., Van Rijswick, H., Priest, S. and Keessen, A. 2015. The rationales of resilience in English and Dutch flood risk policies. Journal of Water and Climate Change. 6 (1), pp. 38-54. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2014.017
Sharing the burden of adapting to increasing flood risk: who pays for flood insurance and flood risk management investment in the United Kingdom
Penning-Rowsell, E. and Priest, S. 2015. Sharing the burden of adapting to increasing flood risk: who pays for flood insurance and flood risk management investment in the United Kingdom. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 20 (6), pp. 991-1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9622-z
Partnership funding in flood risk management: new localism debate and policy in England
Thaler, T. and Priest, S. 2014. Partnership funding in flood risk management: new localism debate and policy in England. Area. 46 (4), pp. 418-425. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12135
The many uncertainties in flood loss assessments
Chatterton, J., Penning-Rowsell, E. and Priest, S. 2014. The many uncertainties in flood loss assessments. in: Beven, K. and Hall, J. (ed.) Applied uncertainty analysis for flood risk management London Imperial College Press. pp. 335-356
Developing a process for stakeholder participation in flood risk mapping
Priest, S., Pardoe, J., McCarthy, S., Meyer, V., Kuhlicke, C. and Luther, J. 2012. Developing a process for stakeholder participation in flood risk mapping. Klijn, F. and Schweckendiek, T. (ed.) London CRC Press - Taylor and Francis Group. pp. 185-186
Review of international flood insurance and recovery mechanisms: Implications for New Zealand and the resilience of older people - research summary
Priest, S. 2014. Review of international flood insurance and recovery mechanisms: Implications for New Zealand and the resilience of older people - research summary. Centre for Research Evaluation and Social Assessment, New Zealand.
Review of international flood insurance and recovery mechanisms: Implications for New Zealand and the resilience of older people
Priest, S. 2014. Review of international flood insurance and recovery mechanisms: Implications for New Zealand and the resilience of older people. Centre for Research Evaluation and Social Assessment, New Zealand.
Narrowing the focus: public understanding of flood maps in the River Thames catchment
Priest, S., Pardoe, J., McCarthy, S. and Viavattene, C. 2011. Narrowing the focus: public understanding of flood maps in the River Thames catchment. in: Zenz, G. and Hornich, R. (ed.) Urban Flood Risk Management: Approaches to enhance resilience of communities, Proceedings of the International Symposium, 21st-23rd September 2011 Graz Technischen Universitat Graz. pp. 309-314
The evolution of UK flood insurance: incremental change over six decades
Penning-Rowsell, E., Priest, S. and Johnson, C. 2014. The evolution of UK flood insurance: incremental change over six decades. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 30 (4), pp. 694-713. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2014.903166
Conceptualizing desertification in Southern Europe: stakeholder interpretations and multiple policy agendas
Juntti, M. and Wilson, G. 2005. Conceptualizing desertification in Southern Europe: stakeholder interpretations and multiple policy agendas. European Environment. 15 (4), pp. 228-249. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.381
Desertification
Juntti, M. 2013. Desertification. in: Harris, P. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Global Environmental Politics Routledge. pp. 506-519
Translating the complexities of flood risk science using KEEPER - a knowledge exchange exploratory tool for professionals in emergency response
Alexander, M., Viavattene, C., Faulkner, H. and Priest, S. 2014. Translating the complexities of flood risk science using KEEPER - a knowledge exchange exploratory tool for professionals in emergency response. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 7 (3), pp. 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12042
Flood and coastal erosion risk management: a manual for economic appraisal
Penning-Rowsell, E., Priest, S., Parker, D., Morris, J., Tunstall, S., Viavattene, C., Chatterton, J. and Owen, D. 2013. Flood and coastal erosion risk management: a manual for economic appraisal. London, UK Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
Recommendations for the user-specific enhancement of flood maps
Meyer, V., Kuhlicke, C., Luther, J., Fuchs, S., Priest, S., Dorner, W., Serrhini, K., Pardoe, J., McCarthy, S., Seidel, J., Palka, G., Unnerstall, H., Viavattene, C. and Scheuer, S. 2012. Recommendations for the user-specific enhancement of flood maps. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 12, pp. 1701-1716. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1701-2012
The fallibility of flood warning chains: can Europe’s flood warnings be effective?
Parker, D. and Priest, S. 2012. The fallibility of flood warning chains: can Europe’s flood warnings be effective? Water Resources Management. 26 (10), pp. 2927-2950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0057-6
Economic evaluation of structural and non-structural flood risk management measures: examples from the Mulde river
Meyer, V., Priest, S. and Kuhlicke, C. 2012. Economic evaluation of structural and non-structural flood risk management measures: examples from the Mulde river. Natural Hazards. 62 (2), pp. 301-324.
Assessing options for the development of surface water flood warning in England and Wales
Priest, S., Parker, D., Hurford, A., Walker, J. and Evans, K. 2011. Assessing options for the development of surface water flood warning in England and Wales. Journal of Environmental Management. 92 (12), pp. 3038-3048.
Modelling the potential damage-reducing benefits of flood warnings using European cases
Priest, S., Parker, D. and Tapsell, S. 2011. Modelling the potential damage-reducing benefits of flood warnings using European cases. Environmental Hazards: Human and Policy Dimensions. 10 (2), pp. 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2011.579335
Implementing cross compliance for agriculture in the EU: relational agency, power and action in different socio-material contexts
Juntti, M. 2012. Implementing cross compliance for agriculture in the EU: relational agency, power and action in different socio-material contexts. Sociologia Ruralis. 52 (3), pp. 294-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00564.x
Surface water flood warning requirements and potential in England and Wales
Parker, D., Priest, S. and McCarthy, S. 2011. Surface water flood warning requirements and potential in England and Wales. Applied Geography. 31 (3), pp. 891-900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.01.002
Flood risk management in England: a changing landscape of risk responsibility?
Johnson, C. and Priest, S. 2008. Flood risk management in England: a changing landscape of risk responsibility? International Journal of Water Resources Development. 24 (4), pp. 513-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620801923146
Understanding and enhancing the public's behavioural response to flood warning information.
Parker, D., Priest, S. and Tapsell, S. 2009. Understanding and enhancing the public's behavioural response to flood warning information. Meteorological Applications. 16 (1), pp. 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.119
Evidence, politics and power in public policy for the environment
Juntti, M., Russell, D. and Turnpenny, J. 2009. Evidence, politics and power in public policy for the environment. Environmental Science and Policy. 12 (3), pp. 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2008.12.007
Confronting flood risk: implications for insurance and risk transfer
Treby, E., Clark, M. and Priest, S. 2006. Confronting flood risk: implications for insurance and risk transfer. Journal of Environmental Management. 81 (4), pp. 351-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.11.010
Flood insurance: the challenge of the uninsured
Priest, S., Clark, M. and Treby, E. 2005. Flood insurance: the challenge of the uninsured. Area. 37 (3), pp. 295-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2005.00633.x
Introduction to rural planning
Gallent, N., Juntti, M., Kidd, S. and Shaw, D. 2008. Introduction to rural planning. Routledge.
Interpreting and reinterpreting agri-environmental policy: communication, trust and knowledge in the implementation process
Juntti, M. and Potter, C. 2002. Interpreting and reinterpreting agri-environmental policy: communication, trust and knowledge in the implementation process. Sociologia Ruralis. 42 (3), pp. 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00212