A framework to assess integration in flood risk management: implications for governance, policy, and practice
Article
Cumiskey, L., Priest, S., Klijn, F. and Juntti, M. 2019. A framework to assess integration in flood risk management: implications for governance, policy, and practice. Ecology & Society. 24 (4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11298-240417
Type | Article |
---|---|
Title | A framework to assess integration in flood risk management: implications for governance, policy, and practice |
Authors | Cumiskey, L., Priest, S., Klijn, F. and Juntti, M. |
Abstract | Over decades the concept of integration has been promoted to enhance alignment between policy domains, and to manage trade-offs and maximize synergies across management practices. Integrated approaches have the potential to enable better outcomes for flood risk management (FRM) and society as a whole. However, achieving integration in practice is a recurring challenge, especially for FRM where multiple actors need to work together across fragmented policy domains. To disentangle this complexity of integration, a framework is proposed for assessing integration and identifying different degrees of integration. This framework is based on evidence from a literature review, 50 interviews with FRM-related professionals in England, and participant observation at 24 meetings relevant for FRM. The framework sets out the context of integration, assesses the governance capacity for integration through the strength of relationships between different types of actors (bridging, bonding, and linking) and the mechanisms (actor-, rule- and resource-based) that influence them, and the realization of integration in practice through knowledge, policies, and interventions. The framework is applied for FRM in England and used to identify degrees of integration: high, intermediate, low, and minimal. An important characteristic of the framework is the interconnectivity between the governance capacity and realization of integration. The framework provides further theoretical insights into the concept of integration, while offering an approach for researchers, policy makers, and practitioners to recognize current degrees of integration in FRM and identify the critical elements for improvement. It is recommended that further research and practice-based applications of the framework are completed in different geographical and institutional contexts. Specifically, such applications can create further understanding of the interactions and dependencies between elements of the governance capacity and realization of integration. |
Keywords | assessment framework; governance; integrated flood risk management; integration; policy |
Research Group | Flood Hazard Research Centre |
Publisher | Resilience Alliance |
Journal | Ecology & Society |
ISSN | 1708-3087 |
Electronic | 1708-3087 |
Publication dates | |
Online | 06 Nov 2019 |
31 Dec 2019 | |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 07 Nov 2019 |
Accepted | 23 Oct 2019 |
Output status | Published |
Publisher's version | License |
Copyright Statement | Copyright © 2019 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license. |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11298-240417 |
Scopus EID | 2-s2.0-85077885448 |
Web of Science identifier | WOS:000506574000035 |
Related Output | |
Has metadata | http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85077885448&partnerID=MN8TOARS |
Language | English |
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/88930
Download files
178
total views87
total downloads0
views this month2
downloads this month