The European Union approach to flood risk management and improving societal resilience: lessons from the implementation of the Floods Directive in six European countries
Article
Priest, S., Suykens, C., Van Rijswick, H., Schellenberger, T., Goytia, S., Kundzewicz, Z., Van Doorn-Hoekveld, W., Beyers, J. and Homewood, S. 2016. The European Union approach to flood risk management and improving societal resilience: lessons from the implementation of the Floods Directive in six European countries. Ecology & Society. 21 (4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08913-210450
Type | Article |
---|---|
Title | The European Union approach to flood risk management and improving societal resilience: lessons from the implementation of the Floods Directive in six European countries |
Authors | Priest, S., Suykens, C., Van Rijswick, H., Schellenberger, T., Goytia, S., Kundzewicz, Z., Van Doorn-Hoekveld, W., Beyers, J. and Homewood, S. |
Abstract | Diversity in flood risk management approaches is often considered to be a strength. However in some national settings, and especially for transboundary rivers, variability and the incompatibility of approaches can reduce the effectiveness of flood risk management. Placed in the context of increasing flood risks, as well as the potential for flooding to undermine the European Union's sustainable development goals, a desire to increase societal resilience to flooding has prompted the introduction of a common European Framework. This paper provides a legal and policy analysis of the implementation of the Floods Directive (2007/60/EC) in six countries; Belgium (Flemish Region), England, France, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden. Evaluation criteria from existing legal and policy literature frame the study of the Directive and its impact on enhancing or constraining societal resilience by using an adaptive governance approach. These criteria are initially used to analyze the key components of the EU approach, before providing insight of the implementation of the Directive at a national level. Similarities and differences in the legal translation of European goals into existing flood risk management are analyzed alongside their relative influence on policy and practice. The research highlights that the impact of the Floods Directive on increasing societal resilience has been nationally variable, in part due to its focus on procedural obligations, rather than on more substantive requirements. Analysis shows that despite a focus on transboundary river basin management, in some cases existing traditions of flood risk management, have overridden objectives to harmonize flood risk management. This could be strengthened by requiring more stringent cooperation and providing the competent authorities in International River Basins Districts with more power. Despite some shortcomings in directly impacting flood risk outcomes, the Directive has positively stimulated discussion and flood risk management planning in countries that were perhaps lagging behind. |
Keywords | adaptive governance; Floods Directive; legal analysis; policy analysis; societal resilience |
Research Group | Flood Hazard Research Centre |
Publisher | Resilience Alliance |
Journal | Ecology & Society |
ISSN | 1708-3087 |
Publication dates | |
31 Dec 2016 | |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 27 Sep 2016 |
Accepted | 25 Sep 2016 |
Output status | Published |
Publisher's version | |
Copyright Statement | Copyright © 2016 by the author(s). Published under license by The Resilience Alliance. |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08913-210450 |
Language | English |
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/86q1y
Download files
61
total views29
total downloads1
views this month0
downloads this month
Export as
Related outputs
The role of different types of knowledge and expertise in explaining recognition justice in flood defence and flood risk prevention
Paauw, M., Crabbe, A., Guevara Viquez, S. and Priest, S. 2025. The role of different types of knowledge and expertise in explaining recognition justice in flood defence and flood risk prevention. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 18 (1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.13040Recognition of differences in the capacity to deal with floods—A cross-country comparison of flood risk management
Pauuw, M., Smith, G., Crabbé, A., Fournier, M., Munck af Rosenschöld, J., Priest, S. and Rekola, A. 2025. Recognition of differences in the capacity to deal with floods—A cross-country comparison of flood risk management. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 18 (1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12965Revised approach for the calculation of groundwater flooding annual average damages: establishing a probability-based relationship for groundwater flooding
Viavattene, C., Hardman, D., Penning-Rowsell, E., Morris, J., Chatterton, J., Parker, D. and Priest, S. 2024. Revised approach for the calculation of groundwater flooding annual average damages: establishing a probability-based relationship for groundwater flooding. Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University.Tailored flood risk communication: residents’ perspectives as starting point
Snel, K., Priest, S., Hartmann, T., Witte, P. and Geertman, S. 2024. Tailored flood risk communication: residents’ perspectives as starting point. Nature and Culture. 19 (3), pp. 297-327. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2024.190304