Partnership funding in flood risk management: new localism debate and policy in England
Article
Thaler, T. and Priest, S. 2014. Partnership funding in flood risk management: new localism debate and policy in England. Area. 46 (4), pp. 418-425. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12135
Type | Article |
---|---|
Title | Partnership funding in flood risk management: new localism debate and policy in England |
Authors | Thaler, T. and Priest, S. |
Abstract | The new flood risk policy discussion in England has started to redefine national policy regarding flood and coastal risk management. The key issue in the new policy agenda is to encourage the responsibilities of local authorities in flood risk management, which involve defining local strategies to manage local risks. This downscaling process in flood risk management has a series of consequences in the development of new governance structures and institutions as well as new working relations and intervention strategies. Nevertheless, the main problem is the gap between the downscaling of responsibility and the transfer of resources; in particular the question concerning funding and social capacity. In this way, the focus of policy discussion refers to two main aspects: (a) the equitable sharing of risk-burdens between public authorities, private companies and individuals and (b) how to encourage government agencies and nongovernment agents to take over responsibility for certain tasks from central government. The aim of this paper is to discuss the new funding regime for English flood risk management policy under the new policy paradigm. |
Keywords | England; new localism; flood risk management; local empowerment; sharing responsibility; qualitative methodology |
Research Group | Flood Hazard Research Centre |
Publisher | Wiley |
Journal | Area |
ISSN | 0004-0894 |
Publication dates | |
04 Nov 2014 | |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 12 Dec 2014 |
Output status | Published |
Accepted author manuscript | |
Copyright Statement | This is the accepted version of the following article: Thaler, T. and Priest, S.J. (2014) Partnership funding in flood risk management: new localism debate and policy in England, Area, 46(4), 418-425., which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/area.12135/abstract. |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12135 |
Language | English |
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/84y4w
Download files
Accepted author manuscript
62
total views26
total downloads3
views this month1
downloads this month
Export as
Related outputs
The role of different types of knowledge and expertise in explaining recognition justice in flood defence and flood risk prevention
Paauw, M., Crabbe, A., Guevara Viquez, S. and Priest, S. 2025. The role of different types of knowledge and expertise in explaining recognition justice in flood defence and flood risk prevention. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 18 (1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.13040Recognition of differences in the capacity to deal with floods—A cross-country comparison of flood risk management
Pauuw, M., Smith, G., Crabbé, A., Fournier, M., Munck af Rosenschöld, J., Priest, S. and Rekola, A. 2025. Recognition of differences in the capacity to deal with floods—A cross-country comparison of flood risk management. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 18 (1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12965Revised approach for the calculation of groundwater flooding annual average damages: establishing a probability-based relationship for groundwater flooding
Viavattene, C., Hardman, D., Penning-Rowsell, E., Morris, J., Chatterton, J., Parker, D. and Priest, S. 2024. Revised approach for the calculation of groundwater flooding annual average damages: establishing a probability-based relationship for groundwater flooding. Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University.Tailored flood risk communication: residents’ perspectives as starting point
Snel, K., Priest, S., Hartmann, T., Witte, P. and Geertman, S. 2024. Tailored flood risk communication: residents’ perspectives as starting point. Nature and Culture. 19 (3), pp. 297-327. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2024.190304data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b68a9/b68a90763bb9157955dc7867498e55a43fbfddfb" alt=""