Strategic use of instruments of land policy for mobilising private land for flood risk management
Article
Löschner, L., Hartmann, T., Priest, S. and Collentine, D. 2021. Strategic use of instruments of land policy for mobilising private land for flood risk management. Environmental Science & Policy. 118, pp. 45-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.01.009
Type | Article |
---|---|
Title | Strategic use of instruments of land policy for mobilising private land for flood risk management |
Authors | Löschner, L., Hartmann, T., Priest, S. and Collentine, D. |
Abstract | The focus on private land of this special issue points at a “policy delivery gap” (Moss, 2008) and the instruments by which to overcome it. Whereas the technical and hydrological functions of land in flood risk management are relatively well known, there remain considerable gaps in the understanding of how to mobilise the required land resources and overcome, respectively prevent, flood-related conflicts in land use (Edelenbos et al., 2013; Morris et al., 2016). As most studies focus on case and context specific solutions, gaining a more comprehensive and generic understanding of the different options and mechanisms of leveraging land for floods is an important task for research and policy practice alike. This cross-disciplinary edited collection brings together research from the natural, technical, legal and social sciences to provide an encompassing instrumental perspective of mobilising land in the context of flood risk management. The core aim of this volume is to explore solutions to this pertinent issue in the broadening policy paradigm. |
Sustainable Development Goals | 11 Sustainable cities and communities |
Middlesex University Theme | Sustainability |
Health & Wellbeing | |
Research Group | Flood Hazard Research Centre |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Journal | Environmental Science & Policy |
ISSN | 1462-9011 |
Electronic | 1873-6416 |
Publication dates | |
Online | 30 Jan 2021 |
30 Apr 2021 | |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 30 Sep 2022 |
Accepted | 22 Jan 2021 |
Output status | Published |
Accepted author manuscript | License |
Copyright Statement | Copyright © 2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.01.009 |
Language | English |
https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/89zxw
Download files
123
total views52
total downloads5
views this month0
downloads this month
Export as
Related outputs
The role of different types of knowledge and expertise in explaining recognition justice in flood defence and flood risk prevention
Paauw, M., Crabbe, A., Guevara Viquez, S. and Priest, S. 2025. The role of different types of knowledge and expertise in explaining recognition justice in flood defence and flood risk prevention. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 18 (1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.13040Recognition of differences in the capacity to deal with floods—A cross-country comparison of flood risk management
Pauuw, M., Smith, G., Crabbé, A., Fournier, M., Munck af Rosenschöld, J., Priest, S. and Rekola, A. 2025. Recognition of differences in the capacity to deal with floods—A cross-country comparison of flood risk management. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 18 (1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12965Revised approach for the calculation of groundwater flooding annual average damages: establishing a probability-based relationship for groundwater flooding
Viavattene, C., Hardman, D., Penning-Rowsell, E., Morris, J., Chatterton, J., Parker, D. and Priest, S. 2024. Revised approach for the calculation of groundwater flooding annual average damages: establishing a probability-based relationship for groundwater flooding. Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University.Tailored flood risk communication: residents’ perspectives as starting point
Snel, K., Priest, S., Hartmann, T., Witte, P. and Geertman, S. 2024. Tailored flood risk communication: residents’ perspectives as starting point. Nature and Culture. 19 (3), pp. 297-327. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2024.190304