The role of personal mitigating factors in criminal sentencing judgments: an empirical investigation

PhD thesis


Belton, I. 2018. The role of personal mitigating factors in criminal sentencing judgments: an empirical investigation. PhD thesis Middlesex University Psychology
TypePhD thesis
TitleThe role of personal mitigating factors in criminal sentencing judgments: an empirical investigation
AuthorsBelton, I.
Abstract

Criminal sentencers must weight and integrate many different factors to reach a judgment, including aggravating factors that argue for a harsher sentence, and mitigating factors that suggest a more lenient sentence. Personal Mitigating Factors (PMFs) relate to the offender, rather than the offence (e.g., remorse or youth/immaturity). Research shows that discretionary sentencing produces inconsistency and bias and lacks the transparency needed to maintain public trust in justice. Although many jurisdictions have introduced more structured sentencing, the mitigation process remains largely discretionary. Structuring personal mitigation could help produce fairer sentences. Any structured approach must, however, be informed by empirical data, and little is known about how sentencers use PMFs, or how the public judges them. This thesis examined the role of three commonly occurring PMFs: remorse, good character, and addressing addiction.
Study 1 examined sentencers’ use of PMFs in cases of assault and burglary through a statistical analysis of annual sentencing data from the Crown Court in England and Wales. Study 2 used a qualitative analysis of interviews with a small sample of Crown Court judges to further explore the findings of Study 1 and identify topics for future research. Studies 3 and 4 used experimental designs to measure how the three PMFs influenced public judgments about sentencing fairness and choice of sentence length. Study 4’s “idiographic” design permitted evaluation of the variation between individuals’ judgments about PMFs.
The present thesis identified several issues with current sentencing practice, notably the underweighting of multiple co-occurring PMFs, and proposed some practical options for structuring the personal mitigation process. The thesis also identified conflicts between sentencers’ use of PMFs and public judgments, and suggested how the gap between sentencers and the public could be closed. Lastly, the thesis illustrates how methodology from psychology can be used to advance our understanding of criminal sentencing.

Department namePsychology
Institution nameMiddlesex University
Publication dates
Print06 Apr 2018
Publication process dates
Deposited06 Apr 2018
Accepted20 Mar 2018
Output statusPublished
Accepted author manuscript
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/879qq

Download files


Accepted author manuscript
  • 221
    total views
  • 250
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 2
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Effects of task structure and confirmation bias in alternative hypotheses evaluation
Dhami, M., Belton, I., de Werd, P., Hadzhieva, V. and Wicke, L. 2024. Effects of task structure and confirmation bias in alternative hypotheses evaluation. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-024-00560-y
The role of character-based personal mitigation in sentencing judgments
Belton, I. and Dhami, M. 2024. The role of character-based personal mitigation in sentencing judgments. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 21 (1), pp. 208-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12376
The value of experiments in futures and foresight science: A reply
Derbyshire, J., Dhami, M., Belton, I. and Onkal, D. 2023. The value of experiments in futures and foresight science: A reply. Futures & Foresight Science. 5 (2). https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.156
The value of experiments in futures and foresight science as illustrated by the case of scenario planning
Derbyshire, J., Dhami, M., Belton, I. and Onkal, D. 2022. The value of experiments in futures and foresight science as illustrated by the case of scenario planning. Futures & Foresight Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.146
Disengaging and rehabilitating high-value detainees: a small scale qualitative study
Dhami, M., Goodman-Delahunty, J., Martschuk, N., Cheung, S. and Belton, I. 2020. Disengaging and rehabilitating high-value detainees: a small scale qualitative study. Journal for Deradicalization.
Using scenarios to forecast outcomes of a refugee crisis
Wicke, L., Dhami, M., Onkal, D. and Belton, I. 2022. Using scenarios to forecast outcomes of a refugee crisis. International Journal of Forecasting. 38 (3), pp. 1175-1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.05.017
Criminal sentencing by preferred numbers
Dhami, M., Belton, I., Merrall, E., McGrath, A. and Bird, S. 2020. Criminal sentencing by preferred numbers. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 17 (1), pp. 139-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12246
The "analysis of competing hypotheses" in intelligence analysis
Dhami, M., Belton, I. and Mandel, D. 2019. The "analysis of competing hypotheses" in intelligence analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 33 (6), pp. 1080-1090. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3550
Critical review of analytic techniques
Dhami, M., Belton, I. and Careless, K. 2016. Critical review of analytic techniques. European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC) 2016. Uppsala, Sweden 17 - 19 Aug 2016 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). pp. 152-155 https://doi.org/10.1109/EISIC.2016.33
On getting inside the judge’s mind
Dhami, M. and Belton, I. 2017. On getting inside the judge’s mind. Translational Issues in Psychological Science. 3 (2), pp. 214-226. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000115
Statistical analyses of court decisions: an example of multilevel models of sentencing
Dhami, M. and Belton, I. 2016. Statistical analyses of court decisions: an example of multilevel models of sentencing. Law and Method. 10, pp. 247-266. https://doi.org/10.5553/REM/.000019
Using court records for sentencing research: pitfalls and possibilities
Dhami, M. and Belton, I. 2015. Using court records for sentencing research: pitfalls and possibilities. in: Roberts, J. (ed.) Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales Springer.
Lawyer and nonlawyer susceptibility to framing effects in out-of-court civil litigation settlement
Belton, I., Thomson, M. and Dhami, M. 2014. Lawyer and nonlawyer susceptibility to framing effects in out-of-court civil litigation settlement. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 11 (3), pp. 578-600. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12050
Quasirational models of sentencing
Dhami, M., Belton, I. and Goodman-Delahunty, J. 2015. Quasirational models of sentencing. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 4 (3), pp. 239-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.009