Complete information pivotal-voter model with asymmetric group size

Article


Mavridis, C. and Serena, M. 2018. Complete information pivotal-voter model with asymmetric group size. Public Choice. 177 (1-2), pp. 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-0585-6
TypeArticle
TitleComplete information pivotal-voter model with asymmetric group size
AuthorsMavridis, C. and Serena, M.
Abstract

We study the equilibria of the standard pivotal-voter participation game between two groups of voters of asymmetric sizes (majority and minority), as originally proposed by Palfrey and Rosenthal (Public Choice 41(1):7–53, 1983). We find a unique equilibrium wherein the minority votes with certainty and the majority votes with probability in (0,1); we prove that this is the only equilibrium in which voters of only one group play a pure strategy, and we provide sufficient conditions for its existence. Equilibria where voters of both groups vote with probability in (0, 1) are analyzed numerically.

PublisherSpringer
JournalPublic Choice
ISSN0048-5829
Publication dates
Online18 Jul 2018
Print01 Oct 2018
Publication process dates
Deposited15 Nov 2018
Accepted02 Jul 2018
Output statusPublished
Publisher's version
License
Copyright Statement

© The Author(s) 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the
source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-0585-6
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/8806z

  • 18
    total views
  • 3
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

When efficient help is perceived as greed: experimental evidence
Lodato, S., Güth W., Angelovski, A. and Mavridis, C. 2025. When efficient help is perceived as greed: experimental evidence. Public Choice.
Deciding for others: local public good contributions with intermediaries
Angelovski, A., Kujal, P. and Mavridis, C. 2024. Deciding for others: local public good contributions with intermediaries. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102247
How influential is ballot design in elections?
Casas, A., Diaz, G. and Mavridis, C. 2020. How influential is ballot design in elections? Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2020.1844219
Social capital, communication channels and opinion formation
Mavridis, C. and Tsakas, N. 2020. Social capital, communication channels and opinion formation. Social Choice and Welfare. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-020-01297-5
Complete information pivotal-voter model with asymmetric group size and asymmetric benefits
Mavridis, C. and Serena, M. 2021. Complete information pivotal-voter model with asymmetric group size and asymmetric benefits. European Journal of Political Economy. 67, pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101961
Polling in a proportional representation system
Mavridis, C. and Ortuño-Ortín, I. 2018. Polling in a proportional representation system. Social Choice and Welfare. 51 (2), pp. 297-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-018-1117-5