On the effects of deposit insurance and observability on bank runs: an experimental study

Article


Kiss, H., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Rosa-García, A. 2012. On the effects of deposit insurance and observability on bank runs: an experimental study. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 44 (8), pp. 1651-1665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2012.00548.x
TypeArticle
TitleOn the effects of deposit insurance and observability on bank runs: an experimental study
AuthorsKiss, H., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Rosa-García, A.
Abstract

We study the effects of deposit insurance and observability of previous actions on the emergence of bank runs by means of a controlled laboratory experiment. We consider three depositors in the line of a bank, who decide between withdrawing or keeping their money deposited. We have three treatments with different levels of deposit insurance which reflect the losses a depositor may incur in the case of a bank run. We find that different levels of deposit insurance and the possibility of observing other depositors’ actions affect the likelihood of bank runs. When decisions are not observable, higher levels of deposit insurance decrease the probability of bank runs. When decisions are observable, this need not to be the case. These results suggest that (i) observability might be considered as a partial substitute of deposit insurance and (ii) the optimal deposit insurance should take into account the degree of observability.

PublisherWileyBlackwell
JournalJournal of Money, Credit and Banking
ISSN0022-2879
Publication dates
Print28 Nov 2012
Publication process dates
Deposited19 Sep 2013
Output statusPublished
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2012.00548.x
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/84602

  • 28
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

When the rich do (not) trust the (newly) rich: experimental evidence on the effects of positive random shocks in the trust game
Bejarano, H., Gillet, J. and Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2025. When the rich do (not) trust the (newly) rich: experimental evidence on the effects of positive random shocks in the trust game. Southern Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12758
Trust and trustworthiness after negative random shocks
Bejarano, H., Gillet, J. and Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2021. Trust and trustworthiness after negative random shocks. Journal of Economic Psychology. 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2021.102422
Preferences for efficiency, rather than preferences for morality, drive cooperation in the one-shot Stag-Hunt game
Capraro, V., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Ruiz-Martos, M. 2020. Preferences for efficiency, rather than preferences for morality, drive cooperation in the one-shot Stag-Hunt game. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101535
Cheating, incentives, and money manipulation
Charness, G., Blanco-Jimenez, C., Ezquerra, L. and Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2019. Cheating, incentives, and money manipulation. Experimental Economics: A Journal of the Economic Science Association. 22 (1), pp. 155-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-018-9584-1
No evidence of inequality aversion in the investment game
Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2018. No evidence of inequality aversion in the investment game. PLoS ONE. 13 (10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204392
Do negative random shocks affect trust and trustworthiness?
Bejarano, H., Gillet, J. and Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2018. Do negative random shocks affect trust and trustworthiness? Southern Economic Journal. 85 (2), pp. 563-579. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12302
Thinking fast, thinking badly
Jimenez Jimenez, N., Rodriguez-Lara, I., Tyran, J. and Wengstrom, E. 2018. Thinking fast, thinking badly. Economics Letters. 162, pp. 41-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.10.018
Gender differences in cheating: loss vs gain framing
Ezquerra Guerra, L., Kolev, G. and Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2018. Gender differences in cheating: loss vs gain framing. Economics Letters. 163, pp. 46-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.11.016
Panic bank runs
Kiss, H., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Rosa-García, A. 2018. Panic bank runs. Economics Letters. 162, pp. 146-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.11.014
The emergence of altruism as a social norm
Pereda, M., Branas-Garza, P., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Sanchez, A. 2017. The emergence of altruism as a social norm. Scientific Reports. 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07712-9
Overthrowing the dictator: a game-theoretic approach to revolutions and media
Kiss, H., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Rosa-García, A. 2017. Overthrowing the dictator: a game-theoretic approach to revolutions and media. Social Choice and Welfare. 49 (2), pp. 329-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-017-1067-3
Humans expect generosity
Branas-Garza, P., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Sanchez, A. 2017. Humans expect generosity. Scientific Reports. 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42446
Social motives vs social influence: an experiment on interdependent time preferences
Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Ponti, G. 2017. Social motives vs social influence: an experiment on interdependent time preferences. Games and Economic Behavior. 105, pp. 177-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2017.06.007
Financial crisis and panic in the laboratory
Kiss, H., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Rosa-García, A. 2016. Financial crisis and panic in the laboratory. in: Branas-Garza, P. and Cabrales, A. (ed.) Experimental Economics: Volume II: Economic Applications London Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 92-121
Carry a big stick, or no stick at all: punishment and endowment heterogeneity in the trust game
Calabuig, V., Fatas, E., Olcina, G. and Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2016. Carry a big stick, or no stick at all: punishment and endowment heterogeneity in the trust game. Journal of Economic Psychology. 57, pp. 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.09.006
Equity and bargaining power in ultimatum games
Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2016. Equity and bargaining power in ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 130, pp. 144-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.07.007
An experimental study of gender differences in distributive justice
Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2015. An experimental study of gender differences in distributive justice. Cuadernos de Economía - Spanish Journal of Economics and Finance. 38 (106), pp. 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesjef.2014.01.001
Do social networks prevent or promote bank runs?
Kiss, H., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Rosa-García, A. 2014. Do social networks prevent or promote bank runs? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 101, pp. 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.01.019
Are you a good employee or simply a good guy? influence costs and contract design
Corgnet, B. and Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2013. Are you a good employee or simply a good guy? influence costs and contract design. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 92, pp. 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.06.003
Do women panic more than men? an experimental study of financial decisions
Kiss, H., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Rosa-García, A. 2014. Do women panic more than men? an experimental study of financial decisions. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 52, pp. 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2014.06.003
Think twice before running! Bank runs and cognitive abilities
Kiss, H., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Rosa-García, A. 2016. Think twice before running! Bank runs and cognitive abilities. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 64, pp. 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2015.01.006
Social preferences and cognitive reflection: evidence from a dictator game experiment
Ponti, G. and Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2015. Social preferences and cognitive reflection: evidence from a dictator game experiment. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00146
Self-interest and fairness: self-serving choices of justice principles
Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Moreno-Garrido, L. 2012. Self-interest and fairness: self-serving choices of justice principles. Experimental Economics: A Journal of the Economic Science Association. 15 (1), pp. 158-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9295-3