An experimental study of gender differences in distributive justice

Article

Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2015. An experimental study of gender differences in distributive justice. Cuadernos de Economía - Spanish Journal of Economics and Finance. 38 (106), pp. 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesjef.2014.01.001
TypeArticle
TitleAn experimental study of gender differences in distributive justice
AuthorsRodriguez-Lara, I.
Abstract

This paper shows that women are more likely than men to employ the fair allocation that most benefits their financial payoff. The experimental evidence is gleaned from a dictator game with production, in which subjects first solve a quiz to accumulate earnings and then divide the surplus by choosing one over five different allocations, some of which represent a fairness ideal. The data also suggest that women are more sensitive to the context as their allocation choices depend on whether they have accumulated more or less money than their counterparts. This is not the case for men’s allocation choices (JEL Codes:C91, D30, D64, J16)
Keywords: gender differences, distributive justice, fairness ideals, self-serving choices, experimental economics, dictator game with production.

PublisherAsociacion Cuadernos de Economia / Elsevier España
JournalCuadernos de Economía - Spanish Journal of Economics and Finance
ISSN0210-0266
Publication dates
Print01 Jan 2015
Online13 Mar 2014
Publication process dates
Deposited10 Jun 2015
Accepted27 Jan 2014
Output statusPublished
Accepted author manuscript
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesjef.2014.01.001
LanguageEnglish
Permalink -

https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/85978

Log in to edit

Download files

Accepted author manuscript
Blind Manuscript.pdf

  • 16
    total views
  • 18
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

When the rich do (not) trust the (newly) rich: experimental evidence on the effects of positive random shocks in the trust game
Bejarano, H., Gillet, J. and Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2025. When the rich do (not) trust the (newly) rich: experimental evidence on the effects of positive random shocks in the trust game. Southern Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12758
Trust and trustworthiness after negative random shocks
Bejarano, H., Gillet, J. and Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2021. Trust and trustworthiness after negative random shocks. Journal of Economic Psychology. 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2021.102422
Preferences for efficiency, rather than preferences for morality, drive cooperation in the one-shot Stag-Hunt game
Capraro, V., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Ruiz-Martos, M. 2020. Preferences for efficiency, rather than preferences for morality, drive cooperation in the one-shot Stag-Hunt game. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101535
Cheating, incentives, and money manipulation
Charness, G., Blanco-Jimenez, C., Ezquerra, L. and Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2019. Cheating, incentives, and money manipulation. Experimental Economics: A Journal of the Economic Science Association. 22 (1), pp. 155-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-018-9584-1
No evidence of inequality aversion in the investment game
Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2018. No evidence of inequality aversion in the investment game. PLoS ONE. 13 (10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204392
Do negative random shocks affect trust and trustworthiness?
Bejarano, H., Gillet, J. and Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2018. Do negative random shocks affect trust and trustworthiness? Southern Economic Journal. 85 (2), pp. 563-579. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12302
Thinking fast, thinking badly
Jimenez Jimenez, N., Rodriguez-Lara, I., Tyran, J. and Wengstrom, E. 2018. Thinking fast, thinking badly. Economics Letters. 162, pp. 41-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.10.018
Gender differences in cheating: loss vs gain framing
Ezquerra Guerra, L., Kolev, G. and Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2018. Gender differences in cheating: loss vs gain framing. Economics Letters. 163, pp. 46-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.11.016
Panic bank runs
Kiss, H., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Rosa-García, A. 2018. Panic bank runs. Economics Letters. 162, pp. 146-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.11.014
The emergence of altruism as a social norm
Pereda, M., Branas-Garza, P., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Sanchez, A. 2017. The emergence of altruism as a social norm. Scientific Reports. 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07712-9
Overthrowing the dictator: a game-theoretic approach to revolutions and media
Kiss, H., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Rosa-García, A. 2017. Overthrowing the dictator: a game-theoretic approach to revolutions and media. Social Choice and Welfare. 49 (2), pp. 329-355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-017-1067-3
Humans expect generosity
Branas-Garza, P., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Sanchez, A. 2017. Humans expect generosity. Scientific Reports. 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42446
Social motives vs social influence: an experiment on interdependent time preferences
Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Ponti, G. 2017. Social motives vs social influence: an experiment on interdependent time preferences. Games and Economic Behavior. 105, pp. 177-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2017.06.007
Financial crisis and panic in the laboratory
Kiss, H., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Rosa-García, A. 2016. Financial crisis and panic in the laboratory. in: Branas-Garza, P. and Cabrales, A. (ed.) Experimental Economics: Volume II: Economic Applications London Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 92-121
Carry a big stick, or no stick at all: punishment and endowment heterogeneity in the trust game
Calabuig, V., Fatas, E., Olcina, G. and Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2016. Carry a big stick, or no stick at all: punishment and endowment heterogeneity in the trust game. Journal of Economic Psychology. 57, pp. 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.09.006
Equity and bargaining power in ultimatum games
Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2016. Equity and bargaining power in ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 130, pp. 144-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.07.007
Do social networks prevent or promote bank runs?
Kiss, H., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Rosa-García, A. 2014. Do social networks prevent or promote bank runs? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 101, pp. 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.01.019
Are you a good employee or simply a good guy? influence costs and contract design
Corgnet, B. and Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2013. Are you a good employee or simply a good guy? influence costs and contract design. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 92, pp. 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.06.003
Do women panic more than men? an experimental study of financial decisions
Kiss, H., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Rosa-García, A. 2014. Do women panic more than men? an experimental study of financial decisions. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 52, pp. 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2014.06.003
Think twice before running! Bank runs and cognitive abilities
Kiss, H., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Rosa-García, A. 2016. Think twice before running! Bank runs and cognitive abilities. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 64, pp. 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2015.01.006
Social preferences and cognitive reflection: evidence from a dictator game experiment
Ponti, G. and Rodriguez-Lara, I. 2015. Social preferences and cognitive reflection: evidence from a dictator game experiment. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00146
On the effects of deposit insurance and observability on bank runs: an experimental study
Kiss, H., Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Rosa-García, A. 2012. On the effects of deposit insurance and observability on bank runs: an experimental study. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 44 (8), pp. 1651-1665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2012.00548.x
Self-interest and fairness: self-serving choices of justice principles
Rodriguez-Lara, I. and Moreno-Garrido, L. 2012. Self-interest and fairness: self-serving choices of justice principles. Experimental Economics: A Journal of the Economic Science Association. 15 (1), pp. 158-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9295-3